COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1839 |
Resumo: | Appendectomy, the surgical removal of the inflamed appendix, is a common procedure performed to treat acute appendicitis, one of the most common surgical emergencies. Over the years, two main approaches have been used: open appendectomy, which is the traditional technique, and laparoscopic appendectomy, a minimally invasive approach that has gained popularity in recent decades. The choice between these surgical techniques is a topic of ongoing debate in the medical community, with considerations regarding the benefits and risks of each approach. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, recovery time and costs associated with open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Methodology: The Pubmed, Scielo and Medline databases were used, searching for articles published between 2022 and 2024, in Portuguese or English. Final Considerations: In conclusion, the data analyzed indicate that laparoscopic appendectomy offers advantages over the open approach, including less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery and lower incidence of complications. |
id |
GOE-1_5c1b0fed34944576547a64baaf2e8316 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1839 |
network_acronym_str |
GOE-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMYCOMPARAÇÃO ENTRE APENDICECTOMIA ABERTA E LAPAROSCÓPICAApendicectomia, Cirurgia Geral, Anestesia.Appendectomy, General Surgery, Anesthesia.Appendectomy, the surgical removal of the inflamed appendix, is a common procedure performed to treat acute appendicitis, one of the most common surgical emergencies. Over the years, two main approaches have been used: open appendectomy, which is the traditional technique, and laparoscopic appendectomy, a minimally invasive approach that has gained popularity in recent decades. The choice between these surgical techniques is a topic of ongoing debate in the medical community, with considerations regarding the benefits and risks of each approach. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, recovery time and costs associated with open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Methodology: The Pubmed, Scielo and Medline databases were used, searching for articles published between 2022 and 2024, in Portuguese or English. Final Considerations: In conclusion, the data analyzed indicate that laparoscopic appendectomy offers advantages over the open approach, including less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery and lower incidence of complications.A apendicectomia, a remoção cirúrgica do apêndice inflamado, é um procedimento comum realizado para tratar a apendicite aguda, uma das emergências cirúrgicas mais comuns. Ao longo dos anos, duas abordagens principais têm sido utilizadas: a apendicectomia aberta, que é a técnica tradicional, e a apendicectomia laparoscópica, uma abordagem minimamente invasiva que ganhou popularidade nas últimas décadas. A escolha entre essas técnicas cirúrgicas é um tema de debate contínuo na comunidade médica, com considerações sobre os benefícios e os riscos de cada abordagem. Objetivo: Comparar os resultados clínicos, as complicações pós-operatórias, o tempo de recuperação e os custos associados à apendicectomia aberta e laparoscópica. Metodologia: Foram utilizadas as bases de dados Pubmed, Scielo e Medline, buscando artigos publicados entre os anos de 2022 e 2024, nos idiomas Português ou Inglês. Considerações Finais: Em conclusão, os dados analisados indicam que a apendicectomia laparoscópica oferece vantagens sobre a abordagem aberta, incluindo menor dor pós-operatória, tempo de internação mais curto, recuperação mais rápida e menor incidência de complicações.Specialized Dentistry Group2024-04-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/183910.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p163-179Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - IMPACT FACTOR SJIF 5.807; 163-179Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 163-179Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 6 n. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 163-1792674-8169reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciencesinstname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)instacron:GOEporhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1839/2035Copyright (c) 2024 Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena Filho , Eduardo Águila Raymundo , Maria Luisa Borges Acioli , João Paulo dos Santos Correia , Mariana Costa Miranda , Ingrid Botelho Ribeiro , Júlia Leandro Rêgo , Raul Valério Ponte, Priscila Ferreira de Lima e Souza, Amanda Raimundo Cheade , Letícia Raimundo Cheade https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFilho , Carlos Augusto da Conceição SenaRaymundo , Eduardo Águila Acioli , Maria Luisa Borges Correia , João Paulo dos SantosMiranda , Mariana CostaRibeiro , Ingrid BotelhoRêgo , Júlia LeandroPonte, Raul ValérioSouza, Priscila Ferreira de Lima eCheade , Amanda RaimundoCheade , Letícia Raimundo2024-04-09T11:05:05Zoai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1839Revistahttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihsONGhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/oaijournal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br2674-81692674-8169opendoar:2024-04-09T11:05:05Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE APENDICECTOMIA ABERTA E LAPAROSCÓPICA |
title |
COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY |
spellingShingle |
COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY Filho , Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena Apendicectomia, Cirurgia Geral, Anestesia. Appendectomy, General Surgery, Anesthesia. |
title_short |
COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY |
title_full |
COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY |
title_fullStr |
COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY |
title_sort |
COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY |
author |
Filho , Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena |
author_facet |
Filho , Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena Raymundo , Eduardo Águila Acioli , Maria Luisa Borges Correia , João Paulo dos Santos Miranda , Mariana Costa Ribeiro , Ingrid Botelho Rêgo , Júlia Leandro Ponte, Raul Valério Souza, Priscila Ferreira de Lima e Cheade , Amanda Raimundo Cheade , Letícia Raimundo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Raymundo , Eduardo Águila Acioli , Maria Luisa Borges Correia , João Paulo dos Santos Miranda , Mariana Costa Ribeiro , Ingrid Botelho Rêgo , Júlia Leandro Ponte, Raul Valério Souza, Priscila Ferreira de Lima e Cheade , Amanda Raimundo Cheade , Letícia Raimundo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Filho , Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena Raymundo , Eduardo Águila Acioli , Maria Luisa Borges Correia , João Paulo dos Santos Miranda , Mariana Costa Ribeiro , Ingrid Botelho Rêgo , Júlia Leandro Ponte, Raul Valério Souza, Priscila Ferreira de Lima e Cheade , Amanda Raimundo Cheade , Letícia Raimundo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Apendicectomia, Cirurgia Geral, Anestesia. Appendectomy, General Surgery, Anesthesia. |
topic |
Apendicectomia, Cirurgia Geral, Anestesia. Appendectomy, General Surgery, Anesthesia. |
description |
Appendectomy, the surgical removal of the inflamed appendix, is a common procedure performed to treat acute appendicitis, one of the most common surgical emergencies. Over the years, two main approaches have been used: open appendectomy, which is the traditional technique, and laparoscopic appendectomy, a minimally invasive approach that has gained popularity in recent decades. The choice between these surgical techniques is a topic of ongoing debate in the medical community, with considerations regarding the benefits and risks of each approach. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, recovery time and costs associated with open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Methodology: The Pubmed, Scielo and Medline databases were used, searching for articles published between 2022 and 2024, in Portuguese or English. Final Considerations: In conclusion, the data analyzed indicate that laparoscopic appendectomy offers advantages over the open approach, including less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery and lower incidence of complications. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-04-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1839 10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p163-179 |
url |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1839 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p163-179 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1839/2035 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Specialized Dentistry Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Specialized Dentistry Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - IMPACT FACTOR SJIF 5.807; 163-179 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 163-179 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 6 n. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 163-179 2674-8169 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences instname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) instacron:GOE |
instname_str |
Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) |
instacron_str |
GOE |
institution |
GOE |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
journal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br |
_version_ |
1796798446961688576 |