COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Filho , Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Raymundo , Eduardo Águila, Acioli , Maria Luisa Borges, Correia , João Paulo dos Santos, Miranda , Mariana Costa, Ribeiro , Ingrid Botelho, Rêgo , Júlia Leandro, Ponte, Raul Valério, Souza, Priscila Ferreira de Lima e, Cheade , Amanda Raimundo, Cheade , Letícia Raimundo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1839
Resumo: Appendectomy, the surgical removal of the inflamed appendix, is a common procedure performed to treat acute appendicitis, one of the most common surgical emergencies. Over the years, two main approaches have been used: open appendectomy, which is the traditional technique, and laparoscopic appendectomy, a minimally invasive approach that has gained popularity in recent decades. The choice between these surgical techniques is a topic of ongoing debate in the medical community, with considerations regarding the benefits and risks of each approach. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, recovery time and costs associated with open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Methodology: The Pubmed, Scielo and Medline databases were used, searching for articles published between 2022 and 2024, in Portuguese or English. Final Considerations: In conclusion, the data analyzed indicate that laparoscopic appendectomy offers advantages over the open approach, including less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery and lower incidence of complications.
id GOE-1_5c1b0fed34944576547a64baaf2e8316
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1839
network_acronym_str GOE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMYCOMPARAÇÃO ENTRE APENDICECTOMIA ABERTA E LAPAROSCÓPICAApendicectomia, Cirurgia Geral, Anestesia.Appendectomy, General Surgery, Anesthesia.Appendectomy, the surgical removal of the inflamed appendix, is a common procedure performed to treat acute appendicitis, one of the most common surgical emergencies. Over the years, two main approaches have been used: open appendectomy, which is the traditional technique, and laparoscopic appendectomy, a minimally invasive approach that has gained popularity in recent decades. The choice between these surgical techniques is a topic of ongoing debate in the medical community, with considerations regarding the benefits and risks of each approach. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, recovery time and costs associated with open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Methodology: The Pubmed, Scielo and Medline databases were used, searching for articles published between 2022 and 2024, in Portuguese or English. Final Considerations: In conclusion, the data analyzed indicate that laparoscopic appendectomy offers advantages over the open approach, including less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery and lower incidence of complications.A apendicectomia, a remoção cirúrgica do apêndice inflamado, é um procedimento comum realizado para tratar a apendicite aguda, uma das emergências cirúrgicas mais comuns. Ao longo dos anos, duas abordagens principais têm sido utilizadas: a apendicectomia aberta, que é a técnica tradicional, e a apendicectomia laparoscópica, uma abordagem minimamente invasiva que ganhou popularidade nas últimas décadas. A escolha entre essas técnicas cirúrgicas é um tema de debate contínuo na comunidade médica, com considerações sobre os benefícios e os riscos de cada abordagem. Objetivo: Comparar os resultados clínicos, as complicações pós-operatórias, o tempo de recuperação e os custos associados à apendicectomia aberta e laparoscópica. Metodologia:  Foram utilizadas as bases de dados Pubmed, Scielo e Medline, buscando artigos publicados entre os anos de 2022 e 2024, nos idiomas Português ou Inglês. Considerações Finais: Em conclusão, os dados analisados indicam que a apendicectomia laparoscópica oferece vantagens sobre a abordagem aberta, incluindo menor dor pós-operatória, tempo de internação mais curto, recuperação mais rápida e menor incidência de complicações.Specialized Dentistry Group2024-04-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/183910.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p163-179Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - IMPACT FACTOR SJIF 5.807; 163-179Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 163-179Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 6 n. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 163-1792674-8169reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciencesinstname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)instacron:GOEporhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1839/2035Copyright (c) 2024 Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena Filho , Eduardo Águila Raymundo , Maria Luisa Borges Acioli , João Paulo dos Santos Correia , Mariana Costa Miranda , Ingrid Botelho Ribeiro , Júlia Leandro Rêgo , Raul Valério Ponte, Priscila Ferreira de Lima e Souza, Amanda Raimundo Cheade , Letícia Raimundo Cheade https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFilho , Carlos Augusto da Conceição SenaRaymundo , Eduardo Águila Acioli , Maria Luisa Borges Correia , João Paulo dos SantosMiranda , Mariana CostaRibeiro , Ingrid BotelhoRêgo , Júlia LeandroPonte, Raul ValérioSouza, Priscila Ferreira de Lima eCheade , Amanda RaimundoCheade , Letícia Raimundo2024-04-09T11:05:05Zoai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1839Revistahttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihsONGhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/oaijournal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br2674-81692674-8169opendoar:2024-04-09T11:05:05Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE APENDICECTOMIA ABERTA E LAPAROSCÓPICA
title COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
spellingShingle COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
Filho , Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena
Apendicectomia, Cirurgia Geral, Anestesia.
Appendectomy, General Surgery, Anesthesia.
title_short COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
title_full COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
title_fullStr COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
title_sort COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
author Filho , Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena
author_facet Filho , Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena
Raymundo , Eduardo Águila
Acioli , Maria Luisa Borges
Correia , João Paulo dos Santos
Miranda , Mariana Costa
Ribeiro , Ingrid Botelho
Rêgo , Júlia Leandro
Ponte, Raul Valério
Souza, Priscila Ferreira de Lima e
Cheade , Amanda Raimundo
Cheade , Letícia Raimundo
author_role author
author2 Raymundo , Eduardo Águila
Acioli , Maria Luisa Borges
Correia , João Paulo dos Santos
Miranda , Mariana Costa
Ribeiro , Ingrid Botelho
Rêgo , Júlia Leandro
Ponte, Raul Valério
Souza, Priscila Ferreira de Lima e
Cheade , Amanda Raimundo
Cheade , Letícia Raimundo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Filho , Carlos Augusto da Conceição Sena
Raymundo , Eduardo Águila
Acioli , Maria Luisa Borges
Correia , João Paulo dos Santos
Miranda , Mariana Costa
Ribeiro , Ingrid Botelho
Rêgo , Júlia Leandro
Ponte, Raul Valério
Souza, Priscila Ferreira de Lima e
Cheade , Amanda Raimundo
Cheade , Letícia Raimundo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Apendicectomia, Cirurgia Geral, Anestesia.
Appendectomy, General Surgery, Anesthesia.
topic Apendicectomia, Cirurgia Geral, Anestesia.
Appendectomy, General Surgery, Anesthesia.
description Appendectomy, the surgical removal of the inflamed appendix, is a common procedure performed to treat acute appendicitis, one of the most common surgical emergencies. Over the years, two main approaches have been used: open appendectomy, which is the traditional technique, and laparoscopic appendectomy, a minimally invasive approach that has gained popularity in recent decades. The choice between these surgical techniques is a topic of ongoing debate in the medical community, with considerations regarding the benefits and risks of each approach. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, recovery time and costs associated with open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Methodology: The Pubmed, Scielo and Medline databases were used, searching for articles published between 2022 and 2024, in Portuguese or English. Final Considerations: In conclusion, the data analyzed indicate that laparoscopic appendectomy offers advantages over the open approach, including less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery and lower incidence of complications.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1839
10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p163-179
url https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1839
identifier_str_mv 10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n4p163-179
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1839/2035
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - IMPACT FACTOR SJIF 5.807; 163-179
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 6 Núm. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 163-179
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 6 n. 4 (2024): BJIHS QUALIS B3 - FATOR DE IMPACTO SJIF 5.807; 163-179
2674-8169
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
instname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron:GOE
instname_str Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron_str GOE
institution GOE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
collection Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv journal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br
_version_ 1796798446961688576