PERIOPERATIVE CARE: STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES IN GENERAL SURGERY

• Autor(a) principal: Rêgo, Hosana Maria Araújo
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Outros Autores: Rocha , Maria Eduarda de Sá Bonifácio, Albuquerque , Nilson José Araújo de, Azevedo , Dionatan Assis de, Neto , Osvaldo Meirelles de Oliveira, Faria, Matheus Ruiz de, Mendes , Aline Gabriele de Oliveira, Pérez, Ingrid de Almeida Becerra, Moreira , Caroline Choptian Rodrigues, Alves , Maria Beatriz de Barros, Lima , Katrine Costa Jabra de, Filho , Washington Luiz Rodrigues da Silva, Arrieta, Julio Cesar Denis Ricaldi, Lima, Felipe de Assis Rocha, Novais , Marcela Fernanda Santana, Silva, Fernanda Dourado da, Nascimento , João Paulo Silva do
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
• Texto Completo: https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/1072
• topic: Período Perioperatório; Cirurgia Geral; Melhoria Contínua; Cuidados Cirúrgicos.; Perioperative Period; General Surgery; Continuous Improvement; Surgical Care.

Objective: To understand how perioperative care impacts improvements in general surgery outcomes. Methodology: A systematic literature review was conducted spanning from September 2001 to December 2023. The research was guided by the question "How do perioperative care strategies enhance outcomes in general surgery?" Virtual health databases such as PubMed were utilized, employing specific MeSH descriptors including "Perioperative Care," "Perioperative Period," and "General Surgery." Additionally, the search extended to the Scielo platform, using DeCS terms "General Surgery," "Perioperative Period," and "Perioperative Assistance." Results: Emphasis is placed on the importance of personalized perioperative care, effective interdisciplinary communication, precise fluid management, active patient education, effective antibiotic prophylaxis protocols, multidisciplinary involvement in rehabilitation, and continuous improvement based on indicators. These elements were identified as crucial for achieving more positive surgical outcomes in general surgeries. Conclusion: The outcomes of this systematic review underscore the imperative need for ironic approaches, synergistic interdisciplinary collaboration, and an interactive perspective in enhancing perioperative care in general surgery. These elements not only positively corroborate surgical outcomes but also fortify the framework for a more effective and patient-centered clinical practice.