Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: a systematic review.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Giro, Gabriela
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Chambrone, Leandro, Goldstein, Abrao, Rodrigues, Jose Augusto, Zenóbio, Elton, Feres, Magda, Figueiredo, Luciene Cristina, Cassoni, Alessandra, Awad Shibli, Jamil
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/71
Resumo: AIM: To assess the failure and bone-to-implant contact rate of dental implants placed on osteoporotic subjects. METHODS: Extensive examination strategies were created to classify studies for this systematic review. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and EMBASE database were examined for studies in English up to and including May 2014. The examination presented a combination of the MeSH words described as follow: "osteoporosis" or "osteopenia" or "estrogen deficiency" AND "implant" or "dental implant" or "osseointegration". Assessment of clinical and/or histological peri-implant conditions in osteoporosis subjects treated with titanium dental implants. The examination included a combination of the MeSH terms described as follow: "osteoporosis" or "osteopenia" or "estrogen deficiency" AND "implant" or "dental implant" or "osseointegration". RESULTS: Of 943 potentially eligible articles, 12 were included in the study. A total of 133 subjects with osteoporosis, 73 subjects diagnosed with osteopenia and 708 healthy subjects were assessed in this systematic review. In these subjects were installed 367, 205, 2981 dental implants in osteoporotic, osteopenic and healthy subjects, respectively. The failure rate of dental implant was 10.9% in osteoporotic subjects, 8.29% in osteopenic and 11.43% in healthy ones. Bone-to-implant contact obtained from retrieved implants ranged between 49.96% to 47.84%, for osteoporosis and non-osteoporotic subjects. CONCLUSION: Osteoporotic subjects presented higher rates of implant loss, however, there is a lower evidence to strengthen or refute the hypothesis that osteoporosis may have detrimental effects on bone healing. Consequently, final conclusions regarding the effect of osteoporosis in dental implant therapy cannot be made at this time. There are no randomized clinical trial accessible for evaluation and the retrospective nature of the evaluated studies shall be taken in account when interpreting this study.
id GOE-1_d5041b96fddb047c20db37560de675b0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/71
network_acronym_str GOE-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: a systematic review.Impacto da osteoporose em implantes dentários: uma revisão sistemática.OsseointegraçãoOsteopeniaFalhasOsteoporoseImplantes dentáriosDental implants, Osteoporosis, Failures, Osteopenia, OsseointegrationAIM: To assess the failure and bone-to-implant contact rate of dental implants placed on osteoporotic subjects. METHODS: Extensive examination strategies were created to classify studies for this systematic review. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and EMBASE database were examined for studies in English up to and including May 2014. The examination presented a combination of the MeSH words described as follow: "osteoporosis" or "osteopenia" or "estrogen deficiency" AND "implant" or "dental implant" or "osseointegration". Assessment of clinical and/or histological peri-implant conditions in osteoporosis subjects treated with titanium dental implants. The examination included a combination of the MeSH terms described as follow: "osteoporosis" or "osteopenia" or "estrogen deficiency" AND "implant" or "dental implant" or "osseointegration". RESULTS: Of 943 potentially eligible articles, 12 were included in the study. A total of 133 subjects with osteoporosis, 73 subjects diagnosed with osteopenia and 708 healthy subjects were assessed in this systematic review. In these subjects were installed 367, 205, 2981 dental implants in osteoporotic, osteopenic and healthy subjects, respectively. The failure rate of dental implant was 10.9% in osteoporotic subjects, 8.29% in osteopenic and 11.43% in healthy ones. Bone-to-implant contact obtained from retrieved implants ranged between 49.96% to 47.84%, for osteoporosis and non-osteoporotic subjects. CONCLUSION: Osteoporotic subjects presented higher rates of implant loss, however, there is a lower evidence to strengthen or refute the hypothesis that osteoporosis may have detrimental effects on bone healing. Consequently, final conclusions regarding the effect of osteoporosis in dental implant therapy cannot be made at this time. There are no randomized clinical trial accessible for evaluation and the retrospective nature of the evaluated studies shall be taken in account when interpreting this study. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a falha e a taxa de contato osso-implante de implantes dentários colocados em indivíduos osteoporóticos. MÉTODOS: Estratégias de exame extensas foram criadas para classificar os estudos para esta revisão sistemática. O banco de dados MEDLINE ( via PubMed) e EMBASE foram examinados para estudos em inglês até maio de 2014. O exame apresentou uma combinação das palavras MeSH descritas a seguir: "osteoporose" ou "osteopenia" ou "deficiência de estrogênio" AND "implante" ou "implante dentário" ou "osseointegração". Avaliação das condições clínicas e / ou histológicas do peri-implante em indivíduos com osteoporose tratados com implantes dentários de titânio. O exame incluiu uma combinação dos termos MeSH descritos a seguir: "osteoporose" ou "osteopenia" ou "deficiência de estrogênio" AND "implante" ou "implante dentário" ou "osseointegração". RESULTADOS: Dos 943 artigos potencialmente elegíveis, 12 foram incluídos no estudo. Um total de 133 indivíduos com osteoporose, 73 indivíduos com diagnóstico de osteopenia e 708 indivíduos saudáveis ​​foram avaliados nesta revisão sistemática. Nesses sujeitos foram instalados 367, 205, 2981 implantes dentários em indivíduos osteoporóticos, osteopênicos e saudáveis, respectivamente. A taxa de falha do implante dentário foi de 10,9% nos indivíduos osteoporóticos, 8,29% nos osteopênicos e 11,43% nos saudáveis. O contato osso-implante obtido a partir de implantes recuperados variou entre 49,96% a 47,84%, para osteoporose e indivíduos não osteoporóticos. CONCLUSÃO: Os indivíduos osteoporóticos apresentaram maiores taxas de perda de implantes, no entanto, há uma evidência menor para fortalecer ou refutar a hipótese de que a osteoporose possa ter efeitos prejudiciais na cicatrização óssea. Consequentemente, as conclusões finais sobre o efeito da osteoporose na terapia com implantes dentários não podem ser feitas no momento. Não existem ensaios clínicos randomizados acessíveis para avaliação e a natureza retrospectiva dos estudos avaliados deve ser levada em consideração na interpretação deste estudo. Specialized Dentistry Group2020-05-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticle copied and / or adapted by CC BY license or derivatives.Artigo copiado e ou adptado por licensa CC BY ou derivados.application/pdfhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/7110.36557/2674-8169.2020v2n5p39-50Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 2 No. 5 (2020): May 2020; 39-50Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 2 Núm. 5 (2020): Maio de 2020; 39-50Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 2 n. 5 (2020): Maio de 2020; 39-502674-8169reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciencesinstname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)instacron:GOEporhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/71/103Copyright (c) 2020 Gabriela Giro, Leandro Chambrone, Abrao Goldstein, Jose Augusto Rodrigues, Elton Zenóbio, Magda Feres, Luciene Cristina Figueiredo, Alessandra Cassoni, Jamil Awad Shiblihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGiro, Gabriela Chambrone, Leandro Goldstein, Abrao Rodrigues, Jose Augusto Zenóbio, Elton Feres, Magda Figueiredo, Luciene Cristina Cassoni, Alessandra Awad Shibli, Jamil 2021-11-25T11:26:00Zoai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/71Revistahttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihsONGhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/oaijournal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br2674-81692674-8169opendoar:2021-11-25T11:26Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: a systematic review.
Impacto da osteoporose em implantes dentários: uma revisão sistemática.
title Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: a systematic review.
spellingShingle Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: a systematic review.
Giro, Gabriela
Osseointegração
Osteopenia
Falhas
Osteoporose
Implantes dentários
Dental implants, Osteoporosis, Failures, Osteopenia, Osseointegration
title_short Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: a systematic review.
title_full Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: a systematic review.
title_fullStr Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: a systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: a systematic review.
title_sort Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: a systematic review.
author Giro, Gabriela
author_facet Giro, Gabriela
Chambrone, Leandro
Goldstein, Abrao
Rodrigues, Jose Augusto
Zenóbio, Elton
Feres, Magda
Figueiredo, Luciene Cristina
Cassoni, Alessandra
Awad Shibli, Jamil
author_role author
author2 Chambrone, Leandro
Goldstein, Abrao
Rodrigues, Jose Augusto
Zenóbio, Elton
Feres, Magda
Figueiredo, Luciene Cristina
Cassoni, Alessandra
Awad Shibli, Jamil
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Giro, Gabriela
Chambrone, Leandro
Goldstein, Abrao
Rodrigues, Jose Augusto
Zenóbio, Elton
Feres, Magda
Figueiredo, Luciene Cristina
Cassoni, Alessandra
Awad Shibli, Jamil
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Osseointegração
Osteopenia
Falhas
Osteoporose
Implantes dentários
Dental implants, Osteoporosis, Failures, Osteopenia, Osseointegration
topic Osseointegração
Osteopenia
Falhas
Osteoporose
Implantes dentários
Dental implants, Osteoporosis, Failures, Osteopenia, Osseointegration
description AIM: To assess the failure and bone-to-implant contact rate of dental implants placed on osteoporotic subjects. METHODS: Extensive examination strategies were created to classify studies for this systematic review. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and EMBASE database were examined for studies in English up to and including May 2014. The examination presented a combination of the MeSH words described as follow: "osteoporosis" or "osteopenia" or "estrogen deficiency" AND "implant" or "dental implant" or "osseointegration". Assessment of clinical and/or histological peri-implant conditions in osteoporosis subjects treated with titanium dental implants. The examination included a combination of the MeSH terms described as follow: "osteoporosis" or "osteopenia" or "estrogen deficiency" AND "implant" or "dental implant" or "osseointegration". RESULTS: Of 943 potentially eligible articles, 12 were included in the study. A total of 133 subjects with osteoporosis, 73 subjects diagnosed with osteopenia and 708 healthy subjects were assessed in this systematic review. In these subjects were installed 367, 205, 2981 dental implants in osteoporotic, osteopenic and healthy subjects, respectively. The failure rate of dental implant was 10.9% in osteoporotic subjects, 8.29% in osteopenic and 11.43% in healthy ones. Bone-to-implant contact obtained from retrieved implants ranged between 49.96% to 47.84%, for osteoporosis and non-osteoporotic subjects. CONCLUSION: Osteoporotic subjects presented higher rates of implant loss, however, there is a lower evidence to strengthen or refute the hypothesis that osteoporosis may have detrimental effects on bone healing. Consequently, final conclusions regarding the effect of osteoporosis in dental implant therapy cannot be made at this time. There are no randomized clinical trial accessible for evaluation and the retrospective nature of the evaluated studies shall be taken in account when interpreting this study.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Article copied and / or adapted by CC BY license or derivatives.
Artigo copiado e ou adptado por licensa CC BY ou derivados.
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/71
10.36557/2674-8169.2020v2n5p39-50
url https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/71
identifier_str_mv 10.36557/2674-8169.2020v2n5p39-50
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/71/103
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Specialized Dentistry Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 2 No. 5 (2020): May 2020; 39-50
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 2 Núm. 5 (2020): Maio de 2020; 39-50
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 2 n. 5 (2020): Maio de 2020; 39-50
2674-8169
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
instname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron:GOE
instname_str Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
instacron_str GOE
institution GOE
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
collection Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv journal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br
_version_ 1796798447802646528