Timing and growing conditions of nitrogen topdressing influence the grain yield and protein content of four wheat cultivars

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Raphael Rossi
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Zucareli,Claudemir, Fonseca,Cristina de Batista, Riede,Carlos Roberto, Benin,Giovani, Gazola,Diego
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bragantia
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000300361
Resumo: ABSTRACT The application of an adequate rate and splitting of nitrogen is essential for wheat grain yield and protein content. The aim of this work was to adjust nitrogen management approaches regarding agronomic performance and protein content of wheat cultivars in various environments. Field experiments were conducted under no-tillage system on soybean mulch during the 2011 and 2012 growing seasons in Londrina and Pato Branco regions. The experimental design was a randomized block in split plot with four replicates. Four wheat cultivars (IPR Catuara TM, BRS Gaivota, Quartzo, CD 120) were tested with six nitrogen (N) management forms. Were evaluated: number of ears per unit area (NEA); plant height (PH); thousand-kernel weight (TKW); test weight (TW); grain yield (GY); and protein content (PC). The combined ANOVA (p ? 0.01) and Tukey’s test (p ? 0.01) were used. The interaction between cultivars and environments influence all yield components, GY and PC. The interaction management forms of N and environments affected the TKW, NEA, GY and PC. The results showed that in low-rainfall environments, nitrogen topdressing could be suppressed with no negative effects on GY or PC. Under ideal weather conditions, the GY of wheat cultivars was enhanced on application of 60 kg.ha–1 N of urea at the beginning of tillering as well 20 kg.ha–1 of N at booting. Matching the appropriate cultivars to the ideal growth environment is essential for achieving high GY values. The nitrogen forms on the topdressing do not influence the PC of cultivars in Pato Branco.
id IAC-1_c33745cddb15049bc2c822f03236ca43
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0006-87052019000300361
network_acronym_str IAC-1
network_name_str Bragantia
repository_id_str
spelling Timing and growing conditions of nitrogen topdressing influence the grain yield and protein content of four wheat cultivarsammonium sulphategrain yieldnitrogenTriticum aestivum L, ureaABSTRACT The application of an adequate rate and splitting of nitrogen is essential for wheat grain yield and protein content. The aim of this work was to adjust nitrogen management approaches regarding agronomic performance and protein content of wheat cultivars in various environments. Field experiments were conducted under no-tillage system on soybean mulch during the 2011 and 2012 growing seasons in Londrina and Pato Branco regions. The experimental design was a randomized block in split plot with four replicates. Four wheat cultivars (IPR Catuara TM, BRS Gaivota, Quartzo, CD 120) were tested with six nitrogen (N) management forms. Were evaluated: number of ears per unit area (NEA); plant height (PH); thousand-kernel weight (TKW); test weight (TW); grain yield (GY); and protein content (PC). The combined ANOVA (p ? 0.01) and Tukey’s test (p ? 0.01) were used. The interaction between cultivars and environments influence all yield components, GY and PC. The interaction management forms of N and environments affected the TKW, NEA, GY and PC. The results showed that in low-rainfall environments, nitrogen topdressing could be suppressed with no negative effects on GY or PC. Under ideal weather conditions, the GY of wheat cultivars was enhanced on application of 60 kg.ha–1 N of urea at the beginning of tillering as well 20 kg.ha–1 of N at booting. Matching the appropriate cultivars to the ideal growth environment is essential for achieving high GY values. The nitrogen forms on the topdressing do not influence the PC of cultivars in Pato Branco.Instituto Agronômico de Campinas2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000300361Bragantia v.78 n.3 2019reponame:Bragantiainstname:Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)instacron:IAC10.1590/1678-4499.20180178info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Raphael RossiZucareli,ClaudemirFonseca,Cristina de BatistaRiede,Carlos RobertoBenin,GiovaniGazola,Diegoeng2019-10-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0006-87052019000300361Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/brag/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbragantia@iac.sp.gov.br||bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br1678-44990006-8705opendoar:2019-10-09T00:00Bragantia - Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Timing and growing conditions of nitrogen topdressing influence the grain yield and protein content of four wheat cultivars
title Timing and growing conditions of nitrogen topdressing influence the grain yield and protein content of four wheat cultivars
spellingShingle Timing and growing conditions of nitrogen topdressing influence the grain yield and protein content of four wheat cultivars
Silva,Raphael Rossi
ammonium sulphate
grain yield
nitrogen
Triticum aestivum L, urea
title_short Timing and growing conditions of nitrogen topdressing influence the grain yield and protein content of four wheat cultivars
title_full Timing and growing conditions of nitrogen topdressing influence the grain yield and protein content of four wheat cultivars
title_fullStr Timing and growing conditions of nitrogen topdressing influence the grain yield and protein content of four wheat cultivars
title_full_unstemmed Timing and growing conditions of nitrogen topdressing influence the grain yield and protein content of four wheat cultivars
title_sort Timing and growing conditions of nitrogen topdressing influence the grain yield and protein content of four wheat cultivars
author Silva,Raphael Rossi
author_facet Silva,Raphael Rossi
Zucareli,Claudemir
Fonseca,Cristina de Batista
Riede,Carlos Roberto
Benin,Giovani
Gazola,Diego
author_role author
author2 Zucareli,Claudemir
Fonseca,Cristina de Batista
Riede,Carlos Roberto
Benin,Giovani
Gazola,Diego
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Raphael Rossi
Zucareli,Claudemir
Fonseca,Cristina de Batista
Riede,Carlos Roberto
Benin,Giovani
Gazola,Diego
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ammonium sulphate
grain yield
nitrogen
Triticum aestivum L, urea
topic ammonium sulphate
grain yield
nitrogen
Triticum aestivum L, urea
description ABSTRACT The application of an adequate rate and splitting of nitrogen is essential for wheat grain yield and protein content. The aim of this work was to adjust nitrogen management approaches regarding agronomic performance and protein content of wheat cultivars in various environments. Field experiments were conducted under no-tillage system on soybean mulch during the 2011 and 2012 growing seasons in Londrina and Pato Branco regions. The experimental design was a randomized block in split plot with four replicates. Four wheat cultivars (IPR Catuara TM, BRS Gaivota, Quartzo, CD 120) were tested with six nitrogen (N) management forms. Were evaluated: number of ears per unit area (NEA); plant height (PH); thousand-kernel weight (TKW); test weight (TW); grain yield (GY); and protein content (PC). The combined ANOVA (p ? 0.01) and Tukey’s test (p ? 0.01) were used. The interaction between cultivars and environments influence all yield components, GY and PC. The interaction management forms of N and environments affected the TKW, NEA, GY and PC. The results showed that in low-rainfall environments, nitrogen topdressing could be suppressed with no negative effects on GY or PC. Under ideal weather conditions, the GY of wheat cultivars was enhanced on application of 60 kg.ha–1 N of urea at the beginning of tillering as well 20 kg.ha–1 of N at booting. Matching the appropriate cultivars to the ideal growth environment is essential for achieving high GY values. The nitrogen forms on the topdressing do not influence the PC of cultivars in Pato Branco.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000300361
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000300361
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-4499.20180178
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Agronômico de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Agronômico de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bragantia v.78 n.3 2019
reponame:Bragantia
instname:Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
instacron:IAC
instname_str Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
instacron_str IAC
institution IAC
reponame_str Bragantia
collection Bragantia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bragantia - Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br||bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br
_version_ 1754193307270905856