Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jakobs,Ralf
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Pereira-Lima,Julio C., Schuch,Aline W., Pereira-Lima,Lucas F., Eickhoff,Axel, Riemann,Juergen F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos de gastroenterologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032007000200010
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillotomy is successful in more than 95% of the cases of choledocholithiasis. For patients with difficult bile duct stones not responding to mechanical lithotripsy, different methods for stone fragmentation have been developed. AIM: To compare the results of laser lithotripsy with a stone-tissue recognizing system, when guided by fluoroscopy only or by cholangioscopy. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2002 we have treated 89 patients with difficult bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laser lithotripsy. Unsuccessful extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and electrohydraulic were also performed before laser in 35% and 26% of the cases, respectively. RESULTS: Laser was effective in 79.2% of 72 patients guided by cholangioscopy and in 82.4% of 17 cases steered by fluoroscopy. The median number of impulses in the latter was 4,335 and 1,800 with the former technique. Two parameters influenced the manner of laser guidance. In cases of stones situated above a stricture, cholangioscopic control was more effective (64.7% vs. 31.9%). When the stones were in the distal bile duct, fluoroscopic control was more successful. CONCLUSION: In cases of difficult stones in the distal bile duct, laser lithotripsy under fluoroscopic control is very effective and easily performed. Cholangioscopic guidance should be recommended just in cases of intrahepatic stones or in patients with stones situated proximal to a bile duct stenosis. In these cases, cholangioscopy should be performed either endoscopically or percutaneously.
id IBEPEGE-1_4040706c863de42713d6f69e84883e7e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-28032007000200010
network_acronym_str IBEPEGE-1
network_name_str Arquivos de gastroenterologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?GallstonesLithotripsy, laserCholecystectomy, laparoscopicSphincterotomy, endoscopicBACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillotomy is successful in more than 95% of the cases of choledocholithiasis. For patients with difficult bile duct stones not responding to mechanical lithotripsy, different methods for stone fragmentation have been developed. AIM: To compare the results of laser lithotripsy with a stone-tissue recognizing system, when guided by fluoroscopy only or by cholangioscopy. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2002 we have treated 89 patients with difficult bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laser lithotripsy. Unsuccessful extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and electrohydraulic were also performed before laser in 35% and 26% of the cases, respectively. RESULTS: Laser was effective in 79.2% of 72 patients guided by cholangioscopy and in 82.4% of 17 cases steered by fluoroscopy. The median number of impulses in the latter was 4,335 and 1,800 with the former technique. Two parameters influenced the manner of laser guidance. In cases of stones situated above a stricture, cholangioscopic control was more effective (64.7% vs. 31.9%). When the stones were in the distal bile duct, fluoroscopic control was more successful. CONCLUSION: In cases of difficult stones in the distal bile duct, laser lithotripsy under fluoroscopic control is very effective and easily performed. Cholangioscopic guidance should be recommended just in cases of intrahepatic stones or in patients with stones situated proximal to a bile duct stenosis. In these cases, cholangioscopy should be performed either endoscopically or percutaneously.Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE. 2007-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032007000200010Arquivos de Gastroenterologia v.44 n.2 2007reponame:Arquivos de gastroenterologia (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologiainstacron:IBEPEGE10.1590/S0004-28032007000200010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJakobs,RalfPereira-Lima,Julio C.Schuch,Aline W.Pereira-Lima,Lucas F.Eickhoff,AxelRiemann,Juergen F.eng2007-10-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-28032007000200010Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/aghttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||secretariaarqgastr@hospitaligesp.com.br1678-42190004-2803opendoar:2007-10-23T00:00Arquivos de gastroenterologia (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?
title Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?
spellingShingle Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?
Jakobs,Ralf
Gallstones
Lithotripsy, laser
Cholecystectomy, laparoscopic
Sphincterotomy, endoscopic
title_short Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?
title_full Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?
title_fullStr Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?
title_sort Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?
author Jakobs,Ralf
author_facet Jakobs,Ralf
Pereira-Lima,Julio C.
Schuch,Aline W.
Pereira-Lima,Lucas F.
Eickhoff,Axel
Riemann,Juergen F.
author_role author
author2 Pereira-Lima,Julio C.
Schuch,Aline W.
Pereira-Lima,Lucas F.
Eickhoff,Axel
Riemann,Juergen F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jakobs,Ralf
Pereira-Lima,Julio C.
Schuch,Aline W.
Pereira-Lima,Lucas F.
Eickhoff,Axel
Riemann,Juergen F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gallstones
Lithotripsy, laser
Cholecystectomy, laparoscopic
Sphincterotomy, endoscopic
topic Gallstones
Lithotripsy, laser
Cholecystectomy, laparoscopic
Sphincterotomy, endoscopic
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillotomy is successful in more than 95% of the cases of choledocholithiasis. For patients with difficult bile duct stones not responding to mechanical lithotripsy, different methods for stone fragmentation have been developed. AIM: To compare the results of laser lithotripsy with a stone-tissue recognizing system, when guided by fluoroscopy only or by cholangioscopy. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2002 we have treated 89 patients with difficult bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laser lithotripsy. Unsuccessful extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and electrohydraulic were also performed before laser in 35% and 26% of the cases, respectively. RESULTS: Laser was effective in 79.2% of 72 patients guided by cholangioscopy and in 82.4% of 17 cases steered by fluoroscopy. The median number of impulses in the latter was 4,335 and 1,800 with the former technique. Two parameters influenced the manner of laser guidance. In cases of stones situated above a stricture, cholangioscopic control was more effective (64.7% vs. 31.9%). When the stones were in the distal bile duct, fluoroscopic control was more successful. CONCLUSION: In cases of difficult stones in the distal bile duct, laser lithotripsy under fluoroscopic control is very effective and easily performed. Cholangioscopic guidance should be recommended just in cases of intrahepatic stones or in patients with stones situated proximal to a bile duct stenosis. In these cases, cholangioscopy should be performed either endoscopically or percutaneously.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032007000200010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032007000200010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0004-28032007000200010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos de Gastroenterologia v.44 n.2 2007
reponame:Arquivos de gastroenterologia (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia
instacron:IBEPEGE
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia
instacron_str IBEPEGE
institution IBEPEGE
reponame_str Arquivos de gastroenterologia (Online)
collection Arquivos de gastroenterologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos de gastroenterologia (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||secretariaarqgastr@hospitaligesp.com.br
_version_ 1754193344187072512