Defendant’s proof production in criminal law in Argentina during the investigation stage. A comparative analysis between inquisitorial and adversarial systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vargas, Nicolás Omar
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/328
Resumo: The following paper is based on the analysis of three different procedural systems, all of them which coexist in Argentina: the reformed inquisitorial (applicable at federal and national justice), the first (Provincia de Buenos Aires) and second generation adversarial (Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires). In the incoming lines, I’ll intend to review the similarities and differences that exist in relation to the defendant’s right of introducing proof during the investigation stage of the process. In order to do this, I’ll try to look up how this constitutional right is regulated in each jurisdiction, for then finding out if there is any kind of legacy of the inquisitorial model in adversarial systems.
id IBRASPP-1_dd791119fcf22cb300a31c48efa5f99f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/328
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Defendant’s proof production in criminal law in Argentina during the investigation stage. A comparative analysis between inquisitorial and adversarial systemsLa producción de prueba de descargo por parte de la defensa en el proceso penal en Argentina durante la etapa de instrucción o investigación. Un análisis comparativo entre procesos inquisitivos y acusatoriosEvidence lawdue processequality of armsadversarial processinquisitorial process.derecho de defensaigualdad de armasproceso acusatorioproceso inquisitivoThe following paper is based on the analysis of three different procedural systems, all of them which coexist in Argentina: the reformed inquisitorial (applicable at federal and national justice), the first (Provincia de Buenos Aires) and second generation adversarial (Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires). In the incoming lines, I’ll intend to review the similarities and differences that exist in relation to the defendant’s right of introducing proof during the investigation stage of the process. In order to do this, I’ll try to look up how this constitutional right is regulated in each jurisdiction, for then finding out if there is any kind of legacy of the inquisitorial model in adversarial systems.A partir del análisis de tres sistemas procesales vigentes en Argentina - el que existe a nivel federal y nacional, el de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires y el de la Provincia de Buenos Aires - que a su vez responden a diferentes modelos procesales - inquisitivo reformado, acusatorio de primera generación y acusatorio de segunda generación - pretendo dar cuenta de las similitudes y diferencias que existen en lo relativo al derecho de la defensa a producir prueba de descargo durante la primer etapa del proceso, es decir la etapa de instrucción o investigación según corresponda. Para poder realizar ello voy a responder a las siguientes preguntas ¿De qué manera está regulado el derecho de la defensa a producir prueba de descargo en la etapa de instrucción o de investigación?, para luego responder ¿Existen continuidades del modelo inquisitivo en los procesos acusatorios?Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2020-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/xmlapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/32810.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.328Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020); 329-360Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2020); 329-360Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 1 (2020); 329-360Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 1 (2020); 329-3602525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPspahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/328/289https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/328/293Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolás Omar vargasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVargas, Nicolás Omar2020-10-29T08:43:34Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/328Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-10-29T08:43:34Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Defendant’s proof production in criminal law in Argentina during the investigation stage. A comparative analysis between inquisitorial and adversarial systems
La producción de prueba de descargo por parte de la defensa en el proceso penal en Argentina durante la etapa de instrucción o investigación. Un análisis comparativo entre procesos inquisitivos y acusatorios
title Defendant’s proof production in criminal law in Argentina during the investigation stage. A comparative analysis between inquisitorial and adversarial systems
spellingShingle Defendant’s proof production in criminal law in Argentina during the investigation stage. A comparative analysis between inquisitorial and adversarial systems
Vargas, Nicolás Omar
Evidence law
due process
equality of arms
adversarial process
inquisitorial process.
derecho de defensa
igualdad de armas
proceso acusatorio
proceso inquisitivo
title_short Defendant’s proof production in criminal law in Argentina during the investigation stage. A comparative analysis between inquisitorial and adversarial systems
title_full Defendant’s proof production in criminal law in Argentina during the investigation stage. A comparative analysis between inquisitorial and adversarial systems
title_fullStr Defendant’s proof production in criminal law in Argentina during the investigation stage. A comparative analysis between inquisitorial and adversarial systems
title_full_unstemmed Defendant’s proof production in criminal law in Argentina during the investigation stage. A comparative analysis between inquisitorial and adversarial systems
title_sort Defendant’s proof production in criminal law in Argentina during the investigation stage. A comparative analysis between inquisitorial and adversarial systems
author Vargas, Nicolás Omar
author_facet Vargas, Nicolás Omar
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vargas, Nicolás Omar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Evidence law
due process
equality of arms
adversarial process
inquisitorial process.
derecho de defensa
igualdad de armas
proceso acusatorio
proceso inquisitivo
topic Evidence law
due process
equality of arms
adversarial process
inquisitorial process.
derecho de defensa
igualdad de armas
proceso acusatorio
proceso inquisitivo
description The following paper is based on the analysis of three different procedural systems, all of them which coexist in Argentina: the reformed inquisitorial (applicable at federal and national justice), the first (Provincia de Buenos Aires) and second generation adversarial (Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires). In the incoming lines, I’ll intend to review the similarities and differences that exist in relation to the defendant’s right of introducing proof during the investigation stage of the process. In order to do this, I’ll try to look up how this constitutional right is regulated in each jurisdiction, for then finding out if there is any kind of legacy of the inquisitorial model in adversarial systems.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/328
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.328
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/328
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.328
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/328/289
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/328/293
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolás Omar vargas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolás Omar vargas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/xml
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020); 329-360
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2020); 329-360
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 1 (2020); 329-360
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 1 (2020); 329-360
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329402323369984

Registros relacionados