Feed training of peacock bass (Cichla sp.)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MOURA,M. A. M.
Data de Publicação: 2000
Outros Autores: KUBITZA,F., CYRINO,J. E. P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Biologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71082000000400015
Resumo: The Amazonian cichlid peacock bass (Cichla sp.) is a highly marketable food and sport fish, therefore a suitable species for aquaculture. However, because of its piscivorous feeding preferences, the species does not accept dry feeds voluntarily, turning its intensive culture difficult and costly. This study aimed to wean fingerling peacock bass from inert moist food to dry diets. In a first experiment, 1,134 fingerlings weighting 0.27 g were divided in two 0.37 m³ hapas and fed ground fish flesh with 35% success. Then, 1.3 g fish were pooled, stocked in six 25 L cages and fed two pellet sequences with 80%, 60%, 40%, 20% and 0% ground fish flesh (GFF). One sequence was flavored with 10% krill meal (Euphausia sp.). Training success of fish fed the GFF-00 diet flavored with krill reached 12%ª compared to 11.6%ª (p < 0.05) for diets without krill meal. A second experiment was set up with 969, 1.5 g fish, trained with GFF with 39.8% success. After the feed training period, 2.2 g fish were then fed a sequence of moist pellets containing 80%, 60% and 45% GFF. Fish trained to feed on moist pellets with 45% ground fish were pooled and stocked into nine 25 L cages. Fish were weaned to dry pellets without ground fish flesh (GFF-00) using three diet sequences: 1) dry pellets; 2) moist pellets; and 3) dry pellets flavored with 4% cod liver oil; all three diets contained 30, 10 and 0% GFF. The three sequences yielded, respectively 30.8%ª, 23.6%ª, and 24.7%ª (p < 0.05) fish feeding on GFF-00. There were no apparent beneficial effects of increasing moisture or addition of cod liver oil as flavor enhancers in the weaning diets. This study revealed the feasibility of training peacock bass to accept dry pellets, but feeding young fish ground fish flesh seemed to be a major bottleneck in improving feed training success.
id IIE-2_810852d675ee883ec929d6151c374dcb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-71082000000400015
network_acronym_str IIE-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Biologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Feed training of peacock bass (Cichla sp.)tucunaréCichla sp.feed trainingpalatability enhancersThe Amazonian cichlid peacock bass (Cichla sp.) is a highly marketable food and sport fish, therefore a suitable species for aquaculture. However, because of its piscivorous feeding preferences, the species does not accept dry feeds voluntarily, turning its intensive culture difficult and costly. This study aimed to wean fingerling peacock bass from inert moist food to dry diets. In a first experiment, 1,134 fingerlings weighting 0.27 g were divided in two 0.37 m³ hapas and fed ground fish flesh with 35% success. Then, 1.3 g fish were pooled, stocked in six 25 L cages and fed two pellet sequences with 80%, 60%, 40%, 20% and 0% ground fish flesh (GFF). One sequence was flavored with 10% krill meal (Euphausia sp.). Training success of fish fed the GFF-00 diet flavored with krill reached 12%ª compared to 11.6%ª (p < 0.05) for diets without krill meal. A second experiment was set up with 969, 1.5 g fish, trained with GFF with 39.8% success. After the feed training period, 2.2 g fish were then fed a sequence of moist pellets containing 80%, 60% and 45% GFF. Fish trained to feed on moist pellets with 45% ground fish were pooled and stocked into nine 25 L cages. Fish were weaned to dry pellets without ground fish flesh (GFF-00) using three diet sequences: 1) dry pellets; 2) moist pellets; and 3) dry pellets flavored with 4% cod liver oil; all three diets contained 30, 10 and 0% GFF. The three sequences yielded, respectively 30.8%ª, 23.6%ª, and 24.7%ª (p < 0.05) fish feeding on GFF-00. There were no apparent beneficial effects of increasing moisture or addition of cod liver oil as flavor enhancers in the weaning diets. This study revealed the feasibility of training peacock bass to accept dry pellets, but feeding young fish ground fish flesh seemed to be a major bottleneck in improving feed training success.Instituto Internacional de Ecologia2000-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71082000000400015Revista Brasileira de Biologia v.60 n.4 2000reponame:Revista Brasileira de Biologia (Online)instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)instacron:IIE10.1590/S0034-71082000000400015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMOURA,M. A. M.KUBITZA,F.CYRINO,J. E. P.eng2001-02-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71082000000400015Revistawww.scielo.br/rbbioONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bjb.iie@terra.com.br1806-96060034-7108opendoar:2001-02-22T00:00Revista Brasileira de Biologia (Online) - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Feed training of peacock bass (Cichla sp.)
title Feed training of peacock bass (Cichla sp.)
spellingShingle Feed training of peacock bass (Cichla sp.)
MOURA,M. A. M.
tucunaré
Cichla sp.
feed training
palatability enhancers
title_short Feed training of peacock bass (Cichla sp.)
title_full Feed training of peacock bass (Cichla sp.)
title_fullStr Feed training of peacock bass (Cichla sp.)
title_full_unstemmed Feed training of peacock bass (Cichla sp.)
title_sort Feed training of peacock bass (Cichla sp.)
author MOURA,M. A. M.
author_facet MOURA,M. A. M.
KUBITZA,F.
CYRINO,J. E. P.
author_role author
author2 KUBITZA,F.
CYRINO,J. E. P.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MOURA,M. A. M.
KUBITZA,F.
CYRINO,J. E. P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv tucunaré
Cichla sp.
feed training
palatability enhancers
topic tucunaré
Cichla sp.
feed training
palatability enhancers
description The Amazonian cichlid peacock bass (Cichla sp.) is a highly marketable food and sport fish, therefore a suitable species for aquaculture. However, because of its piscivorous feeding preferences, the species does not accept dry feeds voluntarily, turning its intensive culture difficult and costly. This study aimed to wean fingerling peacock bass from inert moist food to dry diets. In a first experiment, 1,134 fingerlings weighting 0.27 g were divided in two 0.37 m³ hapas and fed ground fish flesh with 35% success. Then, 1.3 g fish were pooled, stocked in six 25 L cages and fed two pellet sequences with 80%, 60%, 40%, 20% and 0% ground fish flesh (GFF). One sequence was flavored with 10% krill meal (Euphausia sp.). Training success of fish fed the GFF-00 diet flavored with krill reached 12%ª compared to 11.6%ª (p < 0.05) for diets without krill meal. A second experiment was set up with 969, 1.5 g fish, trained with GFF with 39.8% success. After the feed training period, 2.2 g fish were then fed a sequence of moist pellets containing 80%, 60% and 45% GFF. Fish trained to feed on moist pellets with 45% ground fish were pooled and stocked into nine 25 L cages. Fish were weaned to dry pellets without ground fish flesh (GFF-00) using three diet sequences: 1) dry pellets; 2) moist pellets; and 3) dry pellets flavored with 4% cod liver oil; all three diets contained 30, 10 and 0% GFF. The three sequences yielded, respectively 30.8%ª, 23.6%ª, and 24.7%ª (p < 0.05) fish feeding on GFF-00. There were no apparent beneficial effects of increasing moisture or addition of cod liver oil as flavor enhancers in the weaning diets. This study revealed the feasibility of training peacock bass to accept dry pellets, but feeding young fish ground fish flesh seemed to be a major bottleneck in improving feed training success.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2000-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71082000000400015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71082000000400015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-71082000000400015
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Internacional de Ecologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Biologia v.60 n.4 2000
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Biologia (Online)
instname:Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron:IIE
instname_str Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
instacron_str IIE
institution IIE
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Biologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Biologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Biologia (Online) - Instituto Internacional de Ecologia (IIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bjb.iie@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754821093777997824