Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guzmán Silva, Maria Angélica
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Guimarães, Jorge S. P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/3232
Resumo: The reaction of the gerbil’s skin to the Chemical induetion of tumors was studied, comparing the early morphologic alterations ocurring in the gerbil to the ones we have also studied in the mouse. Two models of carcinogenesis were used: the cumulative with methylcholanthrene and the biphasic using methylcolanthrene as initiator, followed by croton oil as promoter. The gross findings, such as thickening of the skin and hyperemia induced by the various experiments above, were less evident in the gerbils. The microscopic findings of hyperplasia and inflammatory reaction, were aIso less intense in the gerbii's skin. The cellular proliferation wassimulated, as shown by increased mitotic rate, without any recognizable progressiva hyperplasia of the epidermis with the cumulative modelelectron microscopy displayed a less evident dilatation of intercellular space in the interfollicular epidermis of gerbils than that observed in mice, and the induction of "dark cells" was not registered in gerbils, up to the 10th week of treatment. Gerbils did not show any "dark cell" with the biphasic model, and the initial minimal dilatation of the intercellular space disappeared despite the continuing treatment It has been demonstrated that the skin of the gerbil is more resistant to chemical carcinogenesis than that of the mouse. Gerbils did not develop any papiloma up to the 30th week of treatment with the biphasic model, while mice developed such tumors after a seven-week latency period. With the cumulative model, both gerbil and mouse each developed one papilloma, but the latter did so after ten weeks of treatment, while the former took fifteen weeks. The results suggest that the relative resistence of the gerbil’s skin to Chemical carcinogenesis in based upon and adaptation to the promotion process, specially with the croton oil.
id INCA-1_f5693077bfb8a25b8a3e2ae5ee2f9abd
oai_identifier_str oai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/3232
network_acronym_str INCA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos)Carcinogênese Química CutâneaModelo CumulativoModelo BifásicoGerbilhoChemical Skin CarcinogenesisCumulative ModelBiphasic ModelGerbilThe reaction of the gerbil’s skin to the Chemical induetion of tumors was studied, comparing the early morphologic alterations ocurring in the gerbil to the ones we have also studied in the mouse. Two models of carcinogenesis were used: the cumulative with methylcholanthrene and the biphasic using methylcolanthrene as initiator, followed by croton oil as promoter. The gross findings, such as thickening of the skin and hyperemia induced by the various experiments above, were less evident in the gerbils. The microscopic findings of hyperplasia and inflammatory reaction, were aIso less intense in the gerbii's skin. The cellular proliferation wassimulated, as shown by increased mitotic rate, without any recognizable progressiva hyperplasia of the epidermis with the cumulative modelelectron microscopy displayed a less evident dilatation of intercellular space in the interfollicular epidermis of gerbils than that observed in mice, and the induction of "dark cells" was not registered in gerbils, up to the 10th week of treatment. Gerbils did not show any "dark cell" with the biphasic model, and the initial minimal dilatation of the intercellular space disappeared despite the continuing treatment It has been demonstrated that the skin of the gerbil is more resistant to chemical carcinogenesis than that of the mouse. Gerbils did not develop any papiloma up to the 30th week of treatment with the biphasic model, while mice developed such tumors after a seven-week latency period. With the cumulative model, both gerbil and mouse each developed one papilloma, but the latter did so after ten weeks of treatment, while the former took fifteen weeks. The results suggest that the relative resistence of the gerbil’s skin to Chemical carcinogenesis in based upon and adaptation to the promotion process, specially with the croton oil.Foi estudada a resposta da pele de gerbilho à indução química de tumores, comparando-se as alterações morfológicas iniciais com aquelas que ocorrem na pele do camundongo. Dois modelos de carcinogenese foram aplicados: o cumulativo, utilizando metilcolantreno e o bifásico com metilcolantreno como iniciador e óleo de cróton como promotor. As alterações macroscópicas tais como espessamento da pele e hiperemia, induzidas com os dois tratamentos mencionados foram menos evidentes no gerbilho. A reação inflamatória e a hiperplasia, observadas microscopicamente, também foram de menor intensidade na pele de gerbilho, notando-se, durante os dois tratamentos, o paradoxo do estímulo permanente da proliferação celular, evidenciado pela elevação do índice mitotico, sem hiperplasia progressiva da epiderme. A nível ultra-estrutural, com o modelo cumulativo, na epiderme interfolicular do gerbilho, ocorreu dilatação do espaço intercelular menos evidente do que a registrada na do camundongo, e a indução de "células escuras" não foi observada até a 10ª semana de tratamento. Com o modelo bifásico, na epiderme interfolicular do gerbilho, nao houve indução de "células escuras" e a dilatação do espaço intercelular foi inicialmente, mímima, deixando de existir posteriormente, apesar da continuidade do tratamento. A pele do gerbilho, quando comparada com a de camundongo, mostrou-se relativamente resistente a carcinogenese química. Se no camundongo, com o modelo bifásico, após um período de latência de sete semanas, houve a formação de vários papilomas, no gerbilho não houve desenvolvimento de tumor até à 304 semana, com o modelo cumulativo, tanto no camundongo como no gerbilho, houve desenvolvimento de um papiloma; o período de latência no camundongo foi de dez semanas, enquanto que no gerbilho foi de quinze semanas. Os resultados obtidos sugerem que a relativa resistência da pele de gerbilho à carcinogênese química parece residir em um fenômeno de adaptação ao processo de promoção tumoral, particularmente com óleo de cróton.INCA2023-08-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigos, Avaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/323210.32635/2176-9745.RBC.1986v32n1.3232Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 32 No. 1 (1986): Mar.; 31-42Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (1986): mar.; 31-42Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 32 n. 1 (1986): mar.; 31-422176-9745reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)instacron:INCAporhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/3232/2089https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuzmán Silva, Maria AngélicaGuimarães, Jorge S. P.2023-08-07T18:56:10Zoai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/3232Revistahttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revistaPUBhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/oairbc@inca.gov.br0034-71162176-9745opendoar:2023-08-07T18:56:10Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos)
title Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos)
spellingShingle Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos)
Guzmán Silva, Maria Angélica
Carcinogênese Química Cutânea
Modelo Cumulativo
Modelo Bifásico
Gerbilho
Chemical Skin Carcinogenesis
Cumulative Model
Biphasic Model
Gerbil
title_short Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos)
title_full Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos)
title_fullStr Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos)
title_full_unstemmed Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos)
title_sort Análise Morfológica Comparativa da Carcinogênese Química Cutânea entre Camundongo (Mus Musculus) e Gerbilho (Meriones Unguiculatos)
author Guzmán Silva, Maria Angélica
author_facet Guzmán Silva, Maria Angélica
Guimarães, Jorge S. P.
author_role author
author2 Guimarães, Jorge S. P.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guzmán Silva, Maria Angélica
Guimarães, Jorge S. P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carcinogênese Química Cutânea
Modelo Cumulativo
Modelo Bifásico
Gerbilho
Chemical Skin Carcinogenesis
Cumulative Model
Biphasic Model
Gerbil
topic Carcinogênese Química Cutânea
Modelo Cumulativo
Modelo Bifásico
Gerbilho
Chemical Skin Carcinogenesis
Cumulative Model
Biphasic Model
Gerbil
description The reaction of the gerbil’s skin to the Chemical induetion of tumors was studied, comparing the early morphologic alterations ocurring in the gerbil to the ones we have also studied in the mouse. Two models of carcinogenesis were used: the cumulative with methylcholanthrene and the biphasic using methylcolanthrene as initiator, followed by croton oil as promoter. The gross findings, such as thickening of the skin and hyperemia induced by the various experiments above, were less evident in the gerbils. The microscopic findings of hyperplasia and inflammatory reaction, were aIso less intense in the gerbii's skin. The cellular proliferation wassimulated, as shown by increased mitotic rate, without any recognizable progressiva hyperplasia of the epidermis with the cumulative modelelectron microscopy displayed a less evident dilatation of intercellular space in the interfollicular epidermis of gerbils than that observed in mice, and the induction of "dark cells" was not registered in gerbils, up to the 10th week of treatment. Gerbils did not show any "dark cell" with the biphasic model, and the initial minimal dilatation of the intercellular space disappeared despite the continuing treatment It has been demonstrated that the skin of the gerbil is more resistant to chemical carcinogenesis than that of the mouse. Gerbils did not develop any papiloma up to the 30th week of treatment with the biphasic model, while mice developed such tumors after a seven-week latency period. With the cumulative model, both gerbil and mouse each developed one papilloma, but the latter did so after ten weeks of treatment, while the former took fifteen weeks. The results suggest that the relative resistence of the gerbil’s skin to Chemical carcinogenesis in based upon and adaptation to the promotion process, specially with the croton oil.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigos, Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/3232
10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.1986v32n1.3232
url https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/3232
identifier_str_mv 10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.1986v32n1.3232
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/3232/2089
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv INCA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv INCA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 32 No. 1 (1986): Mar.; 31-42
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (1986): mar.; 31-42
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 32 n. 1 (1986): mar.; 31-42
2176-9745
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
instacron:INCA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
instacron_str INCA
institution INCA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbc@inca.gov.br
_version_ 1797042234813579264