TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Knoll, Manuel
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Journal of Teleological Science
Texto Completo: https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/185
Resumo: This article contributes to the debate on the relation of Aristotle’s practical and theoretical philosophy. It argues that his practical philosophy depends to a considerable extent on his teleological conception of nature. This thesis is primarily directed against scholars who maintain that Aristotle does not derive political and human relations from natural or cosmic conditions. The paper defends David Sedley’s anthropocentric interpretation of Aristotle’s natural teleology and shows how Aristotle applies teleological explanations to power relations among human beings – among men and women and among freemen and natural slaves – and their purposes and goals. The article focuses on Aristotle’s human ‘function’ (ergon) argument, which is a teleological argument at the center of his practical philosophy. It argues that this argument, which Aristotle presents to define ‘human flourishing’ or ‘happiness’ (eudaimonia), depends on his definition of man as the only ‘living being that has language and reason’ (zôon logon echon). It further claims that the dispute about whether Aristotle identifies eudaimonia only with a life of contemplation or whether eudaimonia includes a political life can be clarified by referring to the natural purpose of logos.
id INDEP-3_0ea0d5d2c91f952e924fa229761e963b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.www.telosjournals.com.br:article/185
network_acronym_str INDEP-3
network_name_str Journal of Teleological Science
repository_id_str
spelling TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHYTELEOLOGIA NA FILOSOFIA PRÁTICA DE ARISTÓTELESAristotleTeleologyPractical PhilosophyAristótelesTeleologiaFilosofia PráticaThis article contributes to the debate on the relation of Aristotle’s practical and theoretical philosophy. It argues that his practical philosophy depends to a considerable extent on his teleological conception of nature. This thesis is primarily directed against scholars who maintain that Aristotle does not derive political and human relations from natural or cosmic conditions. The paper defends David Sedley’s anthropocentric interpretation of Aristotle’s natural teleology and shows how Aristotle applies teleological explanations to power relations among human beings – among men and women and among freemen and natural slaves – and their purposes and goals. The article focuses on Aristotle’s human ‘function’ (ergon) argument, which is a teleological argument at the center of his practical philosophy. It argues that this argument, which Aristotle presents to define ‘human flourishing’ or ‘happiness’ (eudaimonia), depends on his definition of man as the only ‘living being that has language and reason’ (zôon logon echon). It further claims that the dispute about whether Aristotle identifies eudaimonia only with a life of contemplation or whether eudaimonia includes a political life can be clarified by referring to the natural purpose of logos.Este artigo contribui para o debate sobre a relação da filosofia prática e teórica de Aristóteles. Ele argumenta que sua filosofia prática depende em grande parte de sua concepção teleológica da natureza. Esta tese é dirigida principalmente contra os estudiosos que sustentam que Aristóteles não deriva de relações políticas e humanas de condições naturais ou cósmicas. O artigo defende a interpretação antropocêntrica de David Sedley da teleologia natural de Aristóteles e mostra como Aristóteles aplica explicações teleológicas às relações de poder entre os seres humanos - entre homens e mulheres e entre homens livres e escravos naturais - e seus propósitos e objetivos. O artigo enfoca o argumento da "função" (ergonomia) humana de Aristóteles, que é um argumento teleológico no centro de sua filosofia prática. Argumenta que este argumento, que Aristóteles apresenta para definir 'florescimento humano' ou 'felicidade' (eudaimonia), depende de sua definição de homem como o único 'ser vivo que tem linguagem e razão' (zôon logon echon). Alega ainda que a disputa sobre se Aristóteles identifica eudaimonia apenas com uma vida de contemplação ou se eudaimonia inclui uma vida política pode ser esclarecida referindo-se ao propósito natural dos logotipos. Sergio Salles2022-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/18510.59079/jts.v1i1.185Journal of Teleological Science; Vol. 2 (2022): JAN.-DEC.; 52-79Journal of Teleological Science; v. 2 (2022): JAN.-DEC.; 52-792763-6577reponame:Journal of Teleological Scienceinstname:Publicação independenteinstacron:INDEPporhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/185/129Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Teleological Sciencehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKnoll, Manuel2023-06-19T20:27:04Zoai:ojs2.www.telosjournals.com.br:article/185Revistahttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jtsPRIhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/oaitelos@telosjournals.com2763-65772763-6577opendoar:2023-06-19T20:27:04Journal of Teleological Science - Publicação independentefalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY
TELEOLOGIA NA FILOSOFIA PRÁTICA DE ARISTÓTELES
title TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY
spellingShingle TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY
Knoll, Manuel
Aristotle
Teleology
Practical Philosophy
Aristóteles
Teleologia
Filosofia Prática
title_short TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY
title_full TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY
title_fullStr TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY
title_full_unstemmed TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY
title_sort TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY
author Knoll, Manuel
author_facet Knoll, Manuel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Knoll, Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aristotle
Teleology
Practical Philosophy
Aristóteles
Teleologia
Filosofia Prática
topic Aristotle
Teleology
Practical Philosophy
Aristóteles
Teleologia
Filosofia Prática
description This article contributes to the debate on the relation of Aristotle’s practical and theoretical philosophy. It argues that his practical philosophy depends to a considerable extent on his teleological conception of nature. This thesis is primarily directed against scholars who maintain that Aristotle does not derive political and human relations from natural or cosmic conditions. The paper defends David Sedley’s anthropocentric interpretation of Aristotle’s natural teleology and shows how Aristotle applies teleological explanations to power relations among human beings – among men and women and among freemen and natural slaves – and their purposes and goals. The article focuses on Aristotle’s human ‘function’ (ergon) argument, which is a teleological argument at the center of his practical philosophy. It argues that this argument, which Aristotle presents to define ‘human flourishing’ or ‘happiness’ (eudaimonia), depends on his definition of man as the only ‘living being that has language and reason’ (zôon logon echon). It further claims that the dispute about whether Aristotle identifies eudaimonia only with a life of contemplation or whether eudaimonia includes a political life can be clarified by referring to the natural purpose of logos.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/185
10.59079/jts.v1i1.185
url https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/185
identifier_str_mv 10.59079/jts.v1i1.185
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/185/129
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Teleological Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Teleological Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sergio Salles
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sergio Salles
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Teleological Science; Vol. 2 (2022): JAN.-DEC.; 52-79
Journal of Teleological Science; v. 2 (2022): JAN.-DEC.; 52-79
2763-6577
reponame:Journal of Teleological Science
instname:Publicação independente
instacron:INDEP
instname_str Publicação independente
instacron_str INDEP
institution INDEP
reponame_str Journal of Teleological Science
collection Journal of Teleological Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Teleological Science - Publicação independente
repository.mail.fl_str_mv telos@telosjournals.com
_version_ 1797042106108215296