Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Agostini, Manuela Rösing
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Marques, Luciana Vieira, Bossle, Marilia Bonzanini
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
Texto Completo: https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035
Resumo: Purpose: The objective of this paper is to propose a theoretical framework to explore social innovation as a response to institutional voids in a multidimensional analysis.Originality/Gap/Relevance/Implications: Approaching the social innovation of the theoretical lens of institutional theory, in the institutional voids perspective. One of the gaps is to propose a multidimensional perspective that will occur through the examination of multiple actors in different institutional settings.Key methodological aspects: To support the framework six theoretical proposals were developed from theoretical gaps identified in a systematic literature review, started in Web of Knowledge database.Summary of key results: Results indicate dimensions that can be investigated in social innovation initiatives that fill institutional voids. The following dimensions were found: dimensions of institutional contexts (considering different contexts and the interference of political, financial, education/work and cultural systems); dimension of multiple actors (giving voice to different actors who have complementary objectives); dimension of the institutional pillars (cognitive, normative and regulative); and, dimensions of social innovation (modify/transform a social need; innovative solution, implementation of social innovation, involve actors and stakeholders; and effective results).Key considerations/conclusions: This framework can be further tested in comparative studies among countries with distinguished levels of development. We identified the importance of analyse different social contexts and the diverse actors who are involved in social innovation initiatives. We identify new areas that are influencing social innovation and we propose new possibilities to investigate this field.
id MACKENZIE_db75d101baa3d7459408e2b7ab5f455c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/9035
network_acronym_str MACKENZIE
network_name_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository_id_str
spelling Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional OverviewInnovación Social como un Proceso para Superar los Vacíos Institucionales: Una Visión MultidimensionalA Inovação Social como Resposta aos Vazios Institucionais: Uma Perspectiva MultidimensionalSocial Innovation. Institutional voids. Multidimensional analysis. Institutional context. Stakeholders.La innovación social. Los vacíos institucionales. El análisis multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders.Inovação social. Vazios institucionais. Análise multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders.Purpose: The objective of this paper is to propose a theoretical framework to explore social innovation as a response to institutional voids in a multidimensional analysis.Originality/Gap/Relevance/Implications: Approaching the social innovation of the theoretical lens of institutional theory, in the institutional voids perspective. One of the gaps is to propose a multidimensional perspective that will occur through the examination of multiple actors in different institutional settings.Key methodological aspects: To support the framework six theoretical proposals were developed from theoretical gaps identified in a systematic literature review, started in Web of Knowledge database.Summary of key results: Results indicate dimensions that can be investigated in social innovation initiatives that fill institutional voids. The following dimensions were found: dimensions of institutional contexts (considering different contexts and the interference of political, financial, education/work and cultural systems); dimension of multiple actors (giving voice to different actors who have complementary objectives); dimension of the institutional pillars (cognitive, normative and regulative); and, dimensions of social innovation (modify/transform a social need; innovative solution, implementation of social innovation, involve actors and stakeholders; and effective results).Key considerations/conclusions: This framework can be further tested in comparative studies among countries with distinguished levels of development. We identified the importance of analyse different social contexts and the diverse actors who are involved in social innovation initiatives. We identify new areas that are influencing social innovation and we propose new possibilities to investigate this field.Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo es proponer un marco teórico para explorar la innovación social como una respuesta a los vacíos institucionales en un análisis multidimensional.Originalidad/Laguna/Relevancia/Implicaciones: Acercar la innovación social de la lente teórica de la teoría institucional, en una perspectiva de los vacíos institucionales. Una de las brechas es proponer una perspectiva multidimensional que se producirá a través del examen de múltiples actores en diferentes entornos institucionales.Principales aspectos metodológicos: Para apoyar el framework se desarrollaron seis proposiciones teóricas identificadas en una revisión sistemática de la literatura, con datos de la base Web ok Knowledge.Síntesis de los principales resultados: Los resultados indican dimensiones que pueden ser investigados en iniciativas de innovación social que llenan los vacíos institucionales. Se encontró las siguientes dimensiones: dimensiones de los contextos institucionales (que tiene en cuenta los diferentes contextos y la interferencia de la política, la educación/trabajo, el sistema financiero y los sistemas culturales); dimensión de múltiples actores (dando voz a los diferentes actores que tienen objetivos complementarios); dimensión de los pilares institucionales (cognitiva, normativa y reguladora); y, las dimensiones de la innovación social (modificar/transformar la necesidad social; solución innovadora, la aplicación de la innovación social, actores y stakeholders; y, los resultados efectivos).Principales consideraciones/conclusiones: Este framework se puede testar en estudios comparativos entre países con niveles distintos de desarrollo. Se identificó la importancia de analizar los diferentes contextos sociales y los diversos actores que participan en iniciativas de innovación social. Además, se identificó nuevas áreas que influyen en la innovación social y se propone nuevas posibilidades para investigar este campo.Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho é propor um arcabouço teórico para explorar a inovação social como uma resposta aos vazios institucionais em uma análise multidimensional.Originalidade/Lacuna/Relevância/Implicações: Aproximar a inovação social da lente teórica da teoria institucional, na perspectiva dos vazios institucionais. Uma das lacunas é propor uma perspectiva multidimensional por meio da observação de múltiplos atores em diferentes contextos institucionais.Principais aspectos metodológicos: Para suportar o framework seis proposições teóricas foram desenvolvidos a partir de lacunas teóricas identificadas em uma revisão sistemática de literatura, iniciada no Web of Knowledge.Síntese dos principais resultados: Os resultados indicam as dimensões que podem ser investigadas em iniciativas de inovação social que preenchem vazios institucionais. As seguintes dimensões foram encontradas: dimensões de contextos institucionais (considerando os diferentes contextos e a interferência do sistema político, de educação/trabalho, sistema financeiro, e sistema cultural; dimensão de múltiplos atores (dando voz a diferentes atores que têm objetivos complementares); dimensão dos pilares institucionais (cognitiva, normativa e regulativa); e, as dimensões da inovação social (modificar/transformar uma necessidade social; solução inovadora; implementação da inovação social; envolvimento dos atores e partes interessadas; e, resultados efetivos).Principais considerações/conclusões: Este framework pode ser testado em estudos comparativos entre países com níveis distintos de desenvolvimento. Identificou-se a importância de analisar diferentes contextos sociais e os diversos atores que estão envolvidos em iniciativas de inovação social. Além disso, foram identificadas novas áreas que estão influenciando a inovação social e foram indicadas novas possibilidades para investigar esse campo.Editora Mackenzie2017-01-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTheoretical research; Systematic literature review.application/pdfimage/pngimage/pngapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 No. 6 (2016): Special Edition Social Innovation: Researching, Defining and Theorizing Social InnovationRevista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 Núm. 6 (2016): Edición Especial Innovación Social: Investigación, Definición y Teorías de Innovación SocialRevista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 17 n. 6 (2016): Edição Especial Inovação Social: Pesquisa, Definição e Teorização de Inovação Social1678-69711518-6776reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)instacron:MACKENZIEenghttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/6263https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9864https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9865https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9866https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9867https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9868Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Administração Mackenzieinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAgostini, Manuela RösingMarques, Luciana VieiraBossle, Marilia Bonzanini2017-01-24T16:27:50Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/9035Revistahttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/PUBhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/oairevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2024-04-19T17:01:05.568319RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview
Innovación Social como un Proceso para Superar los Vacíos Institucionales: Una Visión Multidimensional
A Inovação Social como Resposta aos Vazios Institucionais: Uma Perspectiva Multidimensional
title Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview
spellingShingle Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview
Agostini, Manuela Rösing
Social Innovation. Institutional voids. Multidimensional analysis. Institutional context. Stakeholders.
La innovación social. Los vacíos institucionales. El análisis multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders.
Inovação social. Vazios institucionais. Análise multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders.
title_short Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview
title_full Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview
title_fullStr Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview
title_full_unstemmed Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview
title_sort Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview
author Agostini, Manuela Rösing
author_facet Agostini, Manuela Rösing
Marques, Luciana Vieira
Bossle, Marilia Bonzanini
author_role author
author2 Marques, Luciana Vieira
Bossle, Marilia Bonzanini
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Agostini, Manuela Rösing
Marques, Luciana Vieira
Bossle, Marilia Bonzanini
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Social Innovation. Institutional voids. Multidimensional analysis. Institutional context. Stakeholders.
La innovación social. Los vacíos institucionales. El análisis multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders.
Inovação social. Vazios institucionais. Análise multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders.
topic Social Innovation. Institutional voids. Multidimensional analysis. Institutional context. Stakeholders.
La innovación social. Los vacíos institucionales. El análisis multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders.
Inovação social. Vazios institucionais. Análise multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders.
description Purpose: The objective of this paper is to propose a theoretical framework to explore social innovation as a response to institutional voids in a multidimensional analysis.Originality/Gap/Relevance/Implications: Approaching the social innovation of the theoretical lens of institutional theory, in the institutional voids perspective. One of the gaps is to propose a multidimensional perspective that will occur through the examination of multiple actors in different institutional settings.Key methodological aspects: To support the framework six theoretical proposals were developed from theoretical gaps identified in a systematic literature review, started in Web of Knowledge database.Summary of key results: Results indicate dimensions that can be investigated in social innovation initiatives that fill institutional voids. The following dimensions were found: dimensions of institutional contexts (considering different contexts and the interference of political, financial, education/work and cultural systems); dimension of multiple actors (giving voice to different actors who have complementary objectives); dimension of the institutional pillars (cognitive, normative and regulative); and, dimensions of social innovation (modify/transform a social need; innovative solution, implementation of social innovation, involve actors and stakeholders; and effective results).Key considerations/conclusions: This framework can be further tested in comparative studies among countries with distinguished levels of development. We identified the importance of analyse different social contexts and the diverse actors who are involved in social innovation initiatives. We identify new areas that are influencing social innovation and we propose new possibilities to investigate this field.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Theoretical research; Systematic literature review.
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035
url https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/6263
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9864
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9865
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9866
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9867
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9868
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Administração Mackenzie
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Administração Mackenzie
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
image/png
image/png
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 No. 6 (2016): Special Edition Social Innovation: Researching, Defining and Theorizing Social Innovation
Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 Núm. 6 (2016): Edición Especial Innovación Social: Investigación, Definición y Teorías de Innovación Social
Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 17 n. 6 (2016): Edição Especial Inovação Social: Pesquisa, Definição e Teorização de Inovação Social
1678-6971
1518-6776
reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron:MACKENZIE
instname_str Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron_str MACKENZIE
institution MACKENZIE
reponame_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
collection RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.adm@mackenzie.br
_version_ 1796794719616892928