Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
Texto Completo: | https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035 |
Resumo: | Purpose: The objective of this paper is to propose a theoretical framework to explore social innovation as a response to institutional voids in a multidimensional analysis.Originality/Gap/Relevance/Implications: Approaching the social innovation of the theoretical lens of institutional theory, in the institutional voids perspective. One of the gaps is to propose a multidimensional perspective that will occur through the examination of multiple actors in different institutional settings.Key methodological aspects: To support the framework six theoretical proposals were developed from theoretical gaps identified in a systematic literature review, started in Web of Knowledge database.Summary of key results: Results indicate dimensions that can be investigated in social innovation initiatives that fill institutional voids. The following dimensions were found: dimensions of institutional contexts (considering different contexts and the interference of political, financial, education/work and cultural systems); dimension of multiple actors (giving voice to different actors who have complementary objectives); dimension of the institutional pillars (cognitive, normative and regulative); and, dimensions of social innovation (modify/transform a social need; innovative solution, implementation of social innovation, involve actors and stakeholders; and effective results).Key considerations/conclusions: This framework can be further tested in comparative studies among countries with distinguished levels of development. We identified the importance of analyse different social contexts and the diverse actors who are involved in social innovation initiatives. We identify new areas that are influencing social innovation and we propose new possibilities to investigate this field. |
id |
MACKENZIE_db75d101baa3d7459408e2b7ab5f455c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/9035 |
network_acronym_str |
MACKENZIE |
network_name_str |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional OverviewInnovación Social como un Proceso para Superar los Vacíos Institucionales: Una Visión MultidimensionalA Inovação Social como Resposta aos Vazios Institucionais: Uma Perspectiva MultidimensionalSocial Innovation. Institutional voids. Multidimensional analysis. Institutional context. Stakeholders.La innovación social. Los vacíos institucionales. El análisis multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders.Inovação social. Vazios institucionais. Análise multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders.Purpose: The objective of this paper is to propose a theoretical framework to explore social innovation as a response to institutional voids in a multidimensional analysis.Originality/Gap/Relevance/Implications: Approaching the social innovation of the theoretical lens of institutional theory, in the institutional voids perspective. One of the gaps is to propose a multidimensional perspective that will occur through the examination of multiple actors in different institutional settings.Key methodological aspects: To support the framework six theoretical proposals were developed from theoretical gaps identified in a systematic literature review, started in Web of Knowledge database.Summary of key results: Results indicate dimensions that can be investigated in social innovation initiatives that fill institutional voids. The following dimensions were found: dimensions of institutional contexts (considering different contexts and the interference of political, financial, education/work and cultural systems); dimension of multiple actors (giving voice to different actors who have complementary objectives); dimension of the institutional pillars (cognitive, normative and regulative); and, dimensions of social innovation (modify/transform a social need; innovative solution, implementation of social innovation, involve actors and stakeholders; and effective results).Key considerations/conclusions: This framework can be further tested in comparative studies among countries with distinguished levels of development. We identified the importance of analyse different social contexts and the diverse actors who are involved in social innovation initiatives. We identify new areas that are influencing social innovation and we propose new possibilities to investigate this field.Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo es proponer un marco teórico para explorar la innovación social como una respuesta a los vacíos institucionales en un análisis multidimensional.Originalidad/Laguna/Relevancia/Implicaciones: Acercar la innovación social de la lente teórica de la teoría institucional, en una perspectiva de los vacíos institucionales. Una de las brechas es proponer una perspectiva multidimensional que se producirá a través del examen de múltiples actores en diferentes entornos institucionales.Principales aspectos metodológicos: Para apoyar el framework se desarrollaron seis proposiciones teóricas identificadas en una revisión sistemática de la literatura, con datos de la base Web ok Knowledge.Síntesis de los principales resultados: Los resultados indican dimensiones que pueden ser investigados en iniciativas de innovación social que llenan los vacíos institucionales. Se encontró las siguientes dimensiones: dimensiones de los contextos institucionales (que tiene en cuenta los diferentes contextos y la interferencia de la política, la educación/trabajo, el sistema financiero y los sistemas culturales); dimensión de múltiples actores (dando voz a los diferentes actores que tienen objetivos complementarios); dimensión de los pilares institucionales (cognitiva, normativa y reguladora); y, las dimensiones de la innovación social (modificar/transformar la necesidad social; solución innovadora, la aplicación de la innovación social, actores y stakeholders; y, los resultados efectivos).Principales consideraciones/conclusiones: Este framework se puede testar en estudios comparativos entre países con niveles distintos de desarrollo. Se identificó la importancia de analizar los diferentes contextos sociales y los diversos actores que participan en iniciativas de innovación social. Además, se identificó nuevas áreas que influyen en la innovación social y se propone nuevas posibilidades para investigar este campo.Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho é propor um arcabouço teórico para explorar a inovação social como uma resposta aos vazios institucionais em uma análise multidimensional.Originalidade/Lacuna/Relevância/Implicações: Aproximar a inovação social da lente teórica da teoria institucional, na perspectiva dos vazios institucionais. Uma das lacunas é propor uma perspectiva multidimensional por meio da observação de múltiplos atores em diferentes contextos institucionais.Principais aspectos metodológicos: Para suportar o framework seis proposições teóricas foram desenvolvidos a partir de lacunas teóricas identificadas em uma revisão sistemática de literatura, iniciada no Web of Knowledge.Síntese dos principais resultados: Os resultados indicam as dimensões que podem ser investigadas em iniciativas de inovação social que preenchem vazios institucionais. As seguintes dimensões foram encontradas: dimensões de contextos institucionais (considerando os diferentes contextos e a interferência do sistema político, de educação/trabalho, sistema financeiro, e sistema cultural; dimensão de múltiplos atores (dando voz a diferentes atores que têm objetivos complementares); dimensão dos pilares institucionais (cognitiva, normativa e regulativa); e, as dimensões da inovação social (modificar/transformar uma necessidade social; solução inovadora; implementação da inovação social; envolvimento dos atores e partes interessadas; e, resultados efetivos).Principais considerações/conclusões: Este framework pode ser testado em estudos comparativos entre países com níveis distintos de desenvolvimento. Identificou-se a importância de analisar diferentes contextos sociais e os diversos atores que estão envolvidos em iniciativas de inovação social. Além disso, foram identificadas novas áreas que estão influenciando a inovação social e foram indicadas novas possibilidades para investigar esse campo.Editora Mackenzie2017-01-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTheoretical research; Systematic literature review.application/pdfimage/pngimage/pngapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 No. 6 (2016): Special Edition Social Innovation: Researching, Defining and Theorizing Social InnovationRevista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 Núm. 6 (2016): Edición Especial Innovación Social: Investigación, Definición y Teorías de Innovación SocialRevista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 17 n. 6 (2016): Edição Especial Inovação Social: Pesquisa, Definição e Teorização de Inovação Social1678-69711518-6776reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)instacron:MACKENZIEenghttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/6263https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9864https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9865https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9866https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9867https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9868Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Administração Mackenzieinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAgostini, Manuela RösingMarques, Luciana VieiraBossle, Marilia Bonzanini2017-01-24T16:27:50Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/9035Revistahttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/PUBhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/oairevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2024-04-19T17:01:05.568319RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview Innovación Social como un Proceso para Superar los Vacíos Institucionales: Una Visión Multidimensional A Inovação Social como Resposta aos Vazios Institucionais: Uma Perspectiva Multidimensional |
title |
Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview |
spellingShingle |
Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview Agostini, Manuela Rösing Social Innovation. Institutional voids. Multidimensional analysis. Institutional context. Stakeholders. La innovación social. Los vacíos institucionales. El análisis multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders. Inovação social. Vazios institucionais. Análise multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders. |
title_short |
Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview |
title_full |
Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview |
title_fullStr |
Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview |
title_sort |
Social Innovation as a Process to Overcome Institutional Voids: A Multidimensional Overview |
author |
Agostini, Manuela Rösing |
author_facet |
Agostini, Manuela Rösing Marques, Luciana Vieira Bossle, Marilia Bonzanini |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marques, Luciana Vieira Bossle, Marilia Bonzanini |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Agostini, Manuela Rösing Marques, Luciana Vieira Bossle, Marilia Bonzanini |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Social Innovation. Institutional voids. Multidimensional analysis. Institutional context. Stakeholders. La innovación social. Los vacíos institucionales. El análisis multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders. Inovação social. Vazios institucionais. Análise multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders. |
topic |
Social Innovation. Institutional voids. Multidimensional analysis. Institutional context. Stakeholders. La innovación social. Los vacíos institucionales. El análisis multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders. Inovação social. Vazios institucionais. Análise multidimensional. Contexto institucional. Stakeholders. |
description |
Purpose: The objective of this paper is to propose a theoretical framework to explore social innovation as a response to institutional voids in a multidimensional analysis.Originality/Gap/Relevance/Implications: Approaching the social innovation of the theoretical lens of institutional theory, in the institutional voids perspective. One of the gaps is to propose a multidimensional perspective that will occur through the examination of multiple actors in different institutional settings.Key methodological aspects: To support the framework six theoretical proposals were developed from theoretical gaps identified in a systematic literature review, started in Web of Knowledge database.Summary of key results: Results indicate dimensions that can be investigated in social innovation initiatives that fill institutional voids. The following dimensions were found: dimensions of institutional contexts (considering different contexts and the interference of political, financial, education/work and cultural systems); dimension of multiple actors (giving voice to different actors who have complementary objectives); dimension of the institutional pillars (cognitive, normative and regulative); and, dimensions of social innovation (modify/transform a social need; innovative solution, implementation of social innovation, involve actors and stakeholders; and effective results).Key considerations/conclusions: This framework can be further tested in comparative studies among countries with distinguished levels of development. We identified the importance of analyse different social contexts and the diverse actors who are involved in social innovation initiatives. We identify new areas that are influencing social innovation and we propose new possibilities to investigate this field. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Theoretical research; Systematic literature review. |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035 |
url |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/6263 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9864 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9865 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9866 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9867 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/9035/9868 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Administração Mackenzie info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf image/png image/png application/msword application/msword application/msword |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 No. 6 (2016): Special Edition Social Innovation: Researching, Defining and Theorizing Social Innovation Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 17 Núm. 6 (2016): Edición Especial Innovación Social: Investigación, Definición y Teorías de Innovación Social Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 17 n. 6 (2016): Edição Especial Inovação Social: Pesquisa, Definição e Teorização de Inovação Social 1678-6971 1518-6776 reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) instacron:MACKENZIE |
instname_str |
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) |
instacron_str |
MACKENZIE |
institution |
MACKENZIE |
reponame_str |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
collection |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.adm@mackenzie.br |
_version_ |
1796794719616892928 |