Psychological instruments: comparative study between cognitive-behavioral students and professionals
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/6809 |
Resumo: | This research analyzed if there was any difference between the well-known psychological instruments and the ones used by cognitive-behavioral students and professionals. 40 students and 35 psychologists participated in this study. This study material was composed by two parts. The first one comprised by questions about graduation, professional activity, strategy and instruments used in the assessment. The second part constituted a set of psychological assessment instruments, and the participants task was to assign if they were known or used. Results indicated the most of students and professionals uses the interview in the assessment. The most well-known instruments were Zulliger, Escala de Maturidade Mental Columbia, Teste de Apercepção Temática and WISC-III. The most used instruments were Bender Infantil, Desenho da Figura Humana and Wartegg Test. Others studies should be made to promote the psychologists’ formation development . |
id |
PUC_CAMP-3_e7c64c7b7398168775d77f6c93ca19f8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6809 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_CAMP-3 |
network_name_str |
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Psychological instruments: comparative study between cognitive-behavioral students and professionalsInstrumentos psicológicos: estudo comparativo entre estudantes e profissionais cognitivo-comportamentaisAvaliação comportamentalAvaliação psicológicaTestes psicológicosbehavioral assessmentpsychological assessmentpsychological testsThis research analyzed if there was any difference between the well-known psychological instruments and the ones used by cognitive-behavioral students and professionals. 40 students and 35 psychologists participated in this study. This study material was composed by two parts. The first one comprised by questions about graduation, professional activity, strategy and instruments used in the assessment. The second part constituted a set of psychological assessment instruments, and the participants task was to assign if they were known or used. Results indicated the most of students and professionals uses the interview in the assessment. The most well-known instruments were Zulliger, Escala de Maturidade Mental Columbia, Teste de Apercepção Temática and WISC-III. The most used instruments were Bender Infantil, Desenho da Figura Humana and Wartegg Test. Others studies should be made to promote the psychologists’ formation development .Esta pesquisa analisou se há diferença entre os instrumentos psicológicos mais conhecidos e utilizados por estudantes e profissionais cognitivo-comportamentais. Participaram 40 estudantes, do último ano do curso de Psicologia e 35 psicólogos. Foi utilizado instrumento composto de duas partes, a primeira contemplou questões que visavam à caracterização dos sujeitos quanto à formação, atuação profissional, estratégias e instrumentos utilizados na avaliação. A segunda parte constava de uma relação contendo 152 instrumentos de avaliação psicológica, na qual os sujeitos tinham que assinalar os conhecidos e os utilizados. Os resultados evidenciaram que tanto estudantes quanto profissionais utilizam com maior freqüência em sua avaliação as entrevistas. Os instrumentos mais conhecidos pelos sujeitos foram o Zulliger, a Escala de Maturidade Mental Columbia, o Teste de Apercepção Temática e o WISC-III. Os mais utilizados foram o Bender Infantil, o Desenho da Figura Humana e o Teste Wartegg. Sugere-se que novos estudos sejam realizados com o intuito de promover avanços na preparação do psicólogo brasileiro.Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas2006-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/6809Psychological Studies; Vol. 23 No. 4 (2006): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)Estudos de Psicologia; Vol. 23 Núm. 4 (2006): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)Estudos de Psicologia; v. 23 n. 4 (2006): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)1982-0275reponame:Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPporhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/6809/4433Copyright (c) 2022 Katya Luciane de OLIVEIRA, Ana Paula Porto NORONHA, Marilda Aparecida DANTAShttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOLIVEIRA, Katya Luciane de NORONHA, Ana Paula Porto DANTAS, Marilda Aparecida 2024-05-07T17:46:59Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6809Revistahttps://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/estudosPRIhttps://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/estudos/oaisbi.ne_estpsi@puc-campinas.edu.br||estudosdepsicologia@puc-campinas.edu.br||psychologicalstudies@puc-campinas.edu.br1982-02750103-166Xopendoar:2024-05-07T17:46:59Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Psychological instruments: comparative study between cognitive-behavioral students and professionals Instrumentos psicológicos: estudo comparativo entre estudantes e profissionais cognitivo-comportamentais |
title |
Psychological instruments: comparative study between cognitive-behavioral students and professionals |
spellingShingle |
Psychological instruments: comparative study between cognitive-behavioral students and professionals OLIVEIRA, Katya Luciane de Avaliação comportamental Avaliação psicológica Testes psicológicos behavioral assessment psychological assessment psychological tests |
title_short |
Psychological instruments: comparative study between cognitive-behavioral students and professionals |
title_full |
Psychological instruments: comparative study between cognitive-behavioral students and professionals |
title_fullStr |
Psychological instruments: comparative study between cognitive-behavioral students and professionals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Psychological instruments: comparative study between cognitive-behavioral students and professionals |
title_sort |
Psychological instruments: comparative study between cognitive-behavioral students and professionals |
author |
OLIVEIRA, Katya Luciane de |
author_facet |
OLIVEIRA, Katya Luciane de NORONHA, Ana Paula Porto DANTAS, Marilda Aparecida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
NORONHA, Ana Paula Porto DANTAS, Marilda Aparecida |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
OLIVEIRA, Katya Luciane de NORONHA, Ana Paula Porto DANTAS, Marilda Aparecida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação comportamental Avaliação psicológica Testes psicológicos behavioral assessment psychological assessment psychological tests |
topic |
Avaliação comportamental Avaliação psicológica Testes psicológicos behavioral assessment psychological assessment psychological tests |
description |
This research analyzed if there was any difference between the well-known psychological instruments and the ones used by cognitive-behavioral students and professionals. 40 students and 35 psychologists participated in this study. This study material was composed by two parts. The first one comprised by questions about graduation, professional activity, strategy and instruments used in the assessment. The second part constituted a set of psychological assessment instruments, and the participants task was to assign if they were known or used. Results indicated the most of students and professionals uses the interview in the assessment. The most well-known instruments were Zulliger, Escala de Maturidade Mental Columbia, Teste de Apercepção Temática and WISC-III. The most used instruments were Bender Infantil, Desenho da Figura Humana and Wartegg Test. Others studies should be made to promote the psychologists’ formation development . |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigos |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/6809 |
url |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/6809 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/6809/4433 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Katya Luciane de OLIVEIRA, Ana Paula Porto NORONHA, Marilda Aparecida DANTAS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Katya Luciane de OLIVEIRA, Ana Paula Porto NORONHA, Marilda Aparecida DANTAS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Psychological Studies; Vol. 23 No. 4 (2006): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) Estudos de Psicologia; Vol. 23 Núm. 4 (2006): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) Estudos de Psicologia; v. 23 n. 4 (2006): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) 1982-0275 reponame:Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) instacron:PUC_CAMP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_CAMP |
institution |
PUC_CAMP |
reponame_str |
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) |
collection |
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sbi.ne_estpsi@puc-campinas.edu.br||estudosdepsicologia@puc-campinas.edu.br||psychologicalstudies@puc-campinas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799126015973261312 |