The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silveira, Keller Guimarães
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Alves de Matos, Natália, Castro, Thalles de Freitas, Farias de Souza, Ana Beatriz, Bezerra, Olivia Maria de Paula Alves, Bezerra, Frank Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia em Movimento
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/29014
Resumo: Introduction: Pulmonary function testing, or spirometry, is a validated, globally recognized test that contributes to the diagnosis, staging, and longitudinal follow-up of lung diseases. The exam is most often performed in a sitting position in clinical practice; hence, there are no predicted values for its performance in other positions, such as in different decubitus. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of position on pulmonary function test results in healthy adults. Methods: Forty-two healthy adults of both sexes, divided into male (MG) and female groups (FG), were provided respiratory questionnaires. Subsequently, the pulmonary function test was conducted to evaluate the ventilatory parameters of forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio in the sitting (S), dorsal decubitus (DD), right lateral decubitus (RLD), and left lateral decubitus (LLD) positions. A comparison of the parametric data was performed via one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post-hoc tests. Correlations between the S position variables along with the other positions were evaluated using the Pearson test.  Results: The mean and standard error for the FVC values of the MG at positions DD (4.3 ± 0.7/L), RLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) and LLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) were lower when compared to S (5.05 ± 0.6 L). There was a strong positive correlation between the values of FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC in the S position compared to other positions analyzed in both groups. Conclusion: Body positioning altered the parameters of the pulmonary function test in healthy adults. Keywords: Pulmonary ventilation. Respiratory function tests. Spirometry.
id PUC_PR-26_a1655f2a62b80b2dd8b2a42840c84ef7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/29014
network_acronym_str PUC_PR-26
network_name_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository_id_str
spelling The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adultsOs efeitos de diferentes posições corporais na função pulmonar em adultos saudáveisIntroduction: Pulmonary function testing, or spirometry, is a validated, globally recognized test that contributes to the diagnosis, staging, and longitudinal follow-up of lung diseases. The exam is most often performed in a sitting position in clinical practice; hence, there are no predicted values for its performance in other positions, such as in different decubitus. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of position on pulmonary function test results in healthy adults. Methods: Forty-two healthy adults of both sexes, divided into male (MG) and female groups (FG), were provided respiratory questionnaires. Subsequently, the pulmonary function test was conducted to evaluate the ventilatory parameters of forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio in the sitting (S), dorsal decubitus (DD), right lateral decubitus (RLD), and left lateral decubitus (LLD) positions. A comparison of the parametric data was performed via one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post-hoc tests. Correlations between the S position variables along with the other positions were evaluated using the Pearson test.  Results: The mean and standard error for the FVC values of the MG at positions DD (4.3 ± 0.7/L), RLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) and LLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) were lower when compared to S (5.05 ± 0.6 L). There was a strong positive correlation between the values of FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC in the S position compared to other positions analyzed in both groups. Conclusion: Body positioning altered the parameters of the pulmonary function test in healthy adults. Keywords: Pulmonary ventilation. Respiratory function tests. Spirometry.Introdução: A prova de função pulmonar, ou espirometria, é um teste validado e reconhecido mundialmente que contribui para o diagnóstico, estadiamento e acompanhamento longitudinal das doenças pulmonares. O exame é mais frequentemente realizado na posição sentada na prática clínica; portanto, não há valores previstos para seu desempenho em outras posições, como em decúbitos diferentes. Objetivo: O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar os efeitos da posição nos resultados dos testes de função pulmonar em adultos saudáveis. Métodos: Quarenta e dois adultos saudáveis ​​de ambos os sexos, divididos nos grupos masculino (GM) e feminino (GF), receberam questionários respiratórios. Posteriormente, realizou-se o teste de função pulmonar para avaliar os parâmetros ventilatórios de capacidade vital forçada (CVF), volume expiratório forçado no primeiro segundo (VEF1) e relação VEF1/CVF nas posições sentada (S), decúbito dorsal (DD), decúbito lateral direito (DLD) e decúbito lateral esquerdo (DLE). A comparação dos dados paramétricos foi realizada por meio de análise de variância unidirecional seguida do pós-teste de Tukey. As correlações entre as variáveis ​​da posição S com as demais posições foram avaliadas por meio do teste de Pearson. Resultados: A média e o erro padrão dos valores de CVF do MG nas posições DD (4,3 ± 0,7/L), DLD (4,1 ± 0,6/L) e DLE (4,1 ± 0,6/L) foram menores quando comparados com S (5,05 ± 0,6 L). Houve forte correlação positiva entre os valores de CVF, VEF1 e VEF1/CVF na posição S em relação às demais posições analisadas em ambos os grupos. Conclusão: O posicionamento corporal alterou os parâmetros do teste de função pulmonar em adultos saudáveis. Palavras-chave: Ventilação pulmonar. Testes de função respiratória. Espirometria.Editora PUCPRESS2022-03-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2901410.1590/fm.2022.35111Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 35 (2022): n. cont.Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 35 (2022): n. cont.1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/29014/25443Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilveira, Keller Guimarães Alves de Matos, NatáliaCastro, Thalles de Freitas Farias de Souza, Ana Beatriz Bezerra, Olivia Maria de Paula Alves Bezerra, Frank Silva 2022-10-07T13:31:55Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/29014Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-10-07T13:31:55Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults
Os efeitos de diferentes posições corporais na função pulmonar em adultos saudáveis
title The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults
spellingShingle The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults
Silveira, Keller Guimarães
title_short The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults
title_full The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults
title_fullStr The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults
title_full_unstemmed The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults
title_sort The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults
author Silveira, Keller Guimarães
author_facet Silveira, Keller Guimarães
Alves de Matos, Natália
Castro, Thalles de Freitas
Farias de Souza, Ana Beatriz
Bezerra, Olivia Maria de Paula Alves
Bezerra, Frank Silva
author_role author
author2 Alves de Matos, Natália
Castro, Thalles de Freitas
Farias de Souza, Ana Beatriz
Bezerra, Olivia Maria de Paula Alves
Bezerra, Frank Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silveira, Keller Guimarães
Alves de Matos, Natália
Castro, Thalles de Freitas
Farias de Souza, Ana Beatriz
Bezerra, Olivia Maria de Paula Alves
Bezerra, Frank Silva
description Introduction: Pulmonary function testing, or spirometry, is a validated, globally recognized test that contributes to the diagnosis, staging, and longitudinal follow-up of lung diseases. The exam is most often performed in a sitting position in clinical practice; hence, there are no predicted values for its performance in other positions, such as in different decubitus. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of position on pulmonary function test results in healthy adults. Methods: Forty-two healthy adults of both sexes, divided into male (MG) and female groups (FG), were provided respiratory questionnaires. Subsequently, the pulmonary function test was conducted to evaluate the ventilatory parameters of forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio in the sitting (S), dorsal decubitus (DD), right lateral decubitus (RLD), and left lateral decubitus (LLD) positions. A comparison of the parametric data was performed via one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post-hoc tests. Correlations between the S position variables along with the other positions were evaluated using the Pearson test.  Results: The mean and standard error for the FVC values of the MG at positions DD (4.3 ± 0.7/L), RLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) and LLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) were lower when compared to S (5.05 ± 0.6 L). There was a strong positive correlation between the values of FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC in the S position compared to other positions analyzed in both groups. Conclusion: Body positioning altered the parameters of the pulmonary function test in healthy adults. Keywords: Pulmonary ventilation. Respiratory function tests. Spirometry.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/29014
10.1590/fm.2022.35111
url https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/29014
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/fm.2022.35111
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/29014/25443
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 35 (2022): n. cont.
Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 35 (2022): n. cont.
1980-5918
reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron:PUC_PR
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron_str PUC_PR
institution PUC_PR
reponame_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
collection Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br
_version_ 1799138749617012736