The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia em Movimento |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/29014 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Pulmonary function testing, or spirometry, is a validated, globally recognized test that contributes to the diagnosis, staging, and longitudinal follow-up of lung diseases. The exam is most often performed in a sitting position in clinical practice; hence, there are no predicted values for its performance in other positions, such as in different decubitus. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of position on pulmonary function test results in healthy adults. Methods: Forty-two healthy adults of both sexes, divided into male (MG) and female groups (FG), were provided respiratory questionnaires. Subsequently, the pulmonary function test was conducted to evaluate the ventilatory parameters of forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio in the sitting (S), dorsal decubitus (DD), right lateral decubitus (RLD), and left lateral decubitus (LLD) positions. A comparison of the parametric data was performed via one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post-hoc tests. Correlations between the S position variables along with the other positions were evaluated using the Pearson test. Results: The mean and standard error for the FVC values of the MG at positions DD (4.3 ± 0.7/L), RLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) and LLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) were lower when compared to S (5.05 ± 0.6 L). There was a strong positive correlation between the values of FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC in the S position compared to other positions analyzed in both groups. Conclusion: Body positioning altered the parameters of the pulmonary function test in healthy adults. Keywords: Pulmonary ventilation. Respiratory function tests. Spirometry. |
id |
PUC_PR-26_a1655f2a62b80b2dd8b2a42840c84ef7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/29014 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_PR-26 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adultsOs efeitos de diferentes posições corporais na função pulmonar em adultos saudáveisIntroduction: Pulmonary function testing, or spirometry, is a validated, globally recognized test that contributes to the diagnosis, staging, and longitudinal follow-up of lung diseases. The exam is most often performed in a sitting position in clinical practice; hence, there are no predicted values for its performance in other positions, such as in different decubitus. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of position on pulmonary function test results in healthy adults. Methods: Forty-two healthy adults of both sexes, divided into male (MG) and female groups (FG), were provided respiratory questionnaires. Subsequently, the pulmonary function test was conducted to evaluate the ventilatory parameters of forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio in the sitting (S), dorsal decubitus (DD), right lateral decubitus (RLD), and left lateral decubitus (LLD) positions. A comparison of the parametric data was performed via one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post-hoc tests. Correlations between the S position variables along with the other positions were evaluated using the Pearson test. Results: The mean and standard error for the FVC values of the MG at positions DD (4.3 ± 0.7/L), RLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) and LLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) were lower when compared to S (5.05 ± 0.6 L). There was a strong positive correlation between the values of FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC in the S position compared to other positions analyzed in both groups. Conclusion: Body positioning altered the parameters of the pulmonary function test in healthy adults. Keywords: Pulmonary ventilation. Respiratory function tests. Spirometry.Introdução: A prova de função pulmonar, ou espirometria, é um teste validado e reconhecido mundialmente que contribui para o diagnóstico, estadiamento e acompanhamento longitudinal das doenças pulmonares. O exame é mais frequentemente realizado na posição sentada na prática clínica; portanto, não há valores previstos para seu desempenho em outras posições, como em decúbitos diferentes. Objetivo: O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar os efeitos da posição nos resultados dos testes de função pulmonar em adultos saudáveis. Métodos: Quarenta e dois adultos saudáveis de ambos os sexos, divididos nos grupos masculino (GM) e feminino (GF), receberam questionários respiratórios. Posteriormente, realizou-se o teste de função pulmonar para avaliar os parâmetros ventilatórios de capacidade vital forçada (CVF), volume expiratório forçado no primeiro segundo (VEF1) e relação VEF1/CVF nas posições sentada (S), decúbito dorsal (DD), decúbito lateral direito (DLD) e decúbito lateral esquerdo (DLE). A comparação dos dados paramétricos foi realizada por meio de análise de variância unidirecional seguida do pós-teste de Tukey. As correlações entre as variáveis da posição S com as demais posições foram avaliadas por meio do teste de Pearson. Resultados: A média e o erro padrão dos valores de CVF do MG nas posições DD (4,3 ± 0,7/L), DLD (4,1 ± 0,6/L) e DLE (4,1 ± 0,6/L) foram menores quando comparados com S (5,05 ± 0,6 L). Houve forte correlação positiva entre os valores de CVF, VEF1 e VEF1/CVF na posição S em relação às demais posições analisadas em ambos os grupos. Conclusão: O posicionamento corporal alterou os parâmetros do teste de função pulmonar em adultos saudáveis. Palavras-chave: Ventilação pulmonar. Testes de função respiratória. Espirometria.Editora PUCPRESS2022-03-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2901410.1590/fm.2022.35111Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 35 (2022): n. cont.Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 35 (2022): n. cont.1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/29014/25443Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilveira, Keller Guimarães Alves de Matos, NatáliaCastro, Thalles de Freitas Farias de Souza, Ana Beatriz Bezerra, Olivia Maria de Paula Alves Bezerra, Frank Silva 2022-10-07T13:31:55Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/29014Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-10-07T13:31:55Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults Os efeitos de diferentes posições corporais na função pulmonar em adultos saudáveis |
title |
The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults |
spellingShingle |
The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults Silveira, Keller Guimarães |
title_short |
The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults |
title_full |
The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults |
title_fullStr |
The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults |
title_sort |
The effects of different body positions on pulmonary function in healthy adults |
author |
Silveira, Keller Guimarães |
author_facet |
Silveira, Keller Guimarães Alves de Matos, Natália Castro, Thalles de Freitas Farias de Souza, Ana Beatriz Bezerra, Olivia Maria de Paula Alves Bezerra, Frank Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alves de Matos, Natália Castro, Thalles de Freitas Farias de Souza, Ana Beatriz Bezerra, Olivia Maria de Paula Alves Bezerra, Frank Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silveira, Keller Guimarães Alves de Matos, Natália Castro, Thalles de Freitas Farias de Souza, Ana Beatriz Bezerra, Olivia Maria de Paula Alves Bezerra, Frank Silva |
description |
Introduction: Pulmonary function testing, or spirometry, is a validated, globally recognized test that contributes to the diagnosis, staging, and longitudinal follow-up of lung diseases. The exam is most often performed in a sitting position in clinical practice; hence, there are no predicted values for its performance in other positions, such as in different decubitus. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of position on pulmonary function test results in healthy adults. Methods: Forty-two healthy adults of both sexes, divided into male (MG) and female groups (FG), were provided respiratory questionnaires. Subsequently, the pulmonary function test was conducted to evaluate the ventilatory parameters of forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio in the sitting (S), dorsal decubitus (DD), right lateral decubitus (RLD), and left lateral decubitus (LLD) positions. A comparison of the parametric data was performed via one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey post-hoc tests. Correlations between the S position variables along with the other positions were evaluated using the Pearson test. Results: The mean and standard error for the FVC values of the MG at positions DD (4.3 ± 0.7/L), RLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) and LLD (4.1 ± 0.6/L) were lower when compared to S (5.05 ± 0.6 L). There was a strong positive correlation between the values of FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC in the S position compared to other positions analyzed in both groups. Conclusion: Body positioning altered the parameters of the pulmonary function test in healthy adults. Keywords: Pulmonary ventilation. Respiratory function tests. Spirometry. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/29014 10.1590/fm.2022.35111 |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/29014 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/fm.2022.35111 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/29014/25443 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 35 (2022): n. cont. Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 35 (2022): n. cont. 1980-5918 reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) instacron:PUC_PR |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
instacron_str |
PUC_PR |
institution |
PUC_PR |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
collection |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br |
_version_ |
1799138749617012736 |