Linguistic awareness: diferent views

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lorandi, Aline
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Menezes, Juliana Tatsch, Silva, Itallon Lourenço, Silva, Liane Barreto, Marques, Débora Mattos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: letrônica
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222
Resumo: The present work is a qualitative analysis of data collected during the application of morphological awareness tests, under the light of the Representational Redescription model (KARMILOFF-SMITH, 1986, 1992). These data are from Lorandi (2011). In the present work, we suggest an individual analysis of the responses, not a group analysis as in Lorandi (2011), trying to take into account the developmental trajectory of these participants in relation to their morphological knowledge, or, more specifically, to their skills on derivation, extraction of the base and inflection of nonce words, as well as their judgment on the acceptability of these nonce words, followed by an explanation of their knowledge about real morphemes, which were organized in morphological variant forms that were used by children in the process of morphological acquisition (LORANDI, 2007). We have randomly chosen two participants of each grade – from the 1st to the 4th –, all of them students of a regular school, whose data were analyzed to the purposes of this work. The results show that development is not age-related, a conclusion that is corroborated by the Representational Redescription model, and the results also show that other factors may interfere on the linguistic knowledge development and in its mental representation. These factors will be investigated in our current research. In our considerations about the results, we stress the relevance of a model that is capable of transcending the implicit-explicit dichotomy, as the RR model does, since it is efficient on the explanation of data provided by children.
id PUC_RS-14_41ebfc06c04d6e9b499e6d7ed58caaf4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/12222
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-14
network_name_str letrônica
repository_id_str
spelling Linguistic awareness: diferent viewsConsciência linguística: diferentes olharesLanguage AcquisitionLinguistic AwarenessRepresentational Redescription modelMorphologyPhonology.Aquisição da LinguagemConsciência LinguísticaModelo de Redescrição RepresentacionalMorfologiaFonologia.The present work is a qualitative analysis of data collected during the application of morphological awareness tests, under the light of the Representational Redescription model (KARMILOFF-SMITH, 1986, 1992). These data are from Lorandi (2011). In the present work, we suggest an individual analysis of the responses, not a group analysis as in Lorandi (2011), trying to take into account the developmental trajectory of these participants in relation to their morphological knowledge, or, more specifically, to their skills on derivation, extraction of the base and inflection of nonce words, as well as their judgment on the acceptability of these nonce words, followed by an explanation of their knowledge about real morphemes, which were organized in morphological variant forms that were used by children in the process of morphological acquisition (LORANDI, 2007). We have randomly chosen two participants of each grade – from the 1st to the 4th –, all of them students of a regular school, whose data were analyzed to the purposes of this work. The results show that development is not age-related, a conclusion that is corroborated by the Representational Redescription model, and the results also show that other factors may interfere on the linguistic knowledge development and in its mental representation. These factors will be investigated in our current research. In our considerations about the results, we stress the relevance of a model that is capable of transcending the implicit-explicit dichotomy, as the RR model does, since it is efficient on the explanation of data provided by children.O presente trabalho objetiva uma análise qualitativa de dados coletados durante a aplicação de testes de consciência morfológica, à luz do modelo de Redescrição Representacional (KARMILOFF-SMITH, 1986, 1992). Esses dados são provenientes do trabalho de tese de Lorandi (2011), para os quais sugerimos uma análise por informante, não por série, como foi feito na tese, visando a uma descrição da trajetória desenvolvimental desses informantes com relação a seu conhecimento morfológico, ou, mais especificamente, as suas habilidades de derivação, extração de base e flexão de pseudopalavras, bem como o julgamento de aceitabilidade, seguido de explanação de conhecimento morfológico de morfemas reais da língua arranjados em formas morfológicas variantes efetivamente utilizadas por crianças em fase de aquisição da morfologia (LORANDI, 2007). Foram destacados aleatoriamente dois informantes de cada série – do 1º ao 4º ano – estudantes de uma escola de ensino regular particular, cujos dados foram analisados para fins deste trabalho. Os resultados mostram que o desenvolvimento não é relativo à idade, o que é corroborado pelo modelo de Redescrição Representacional, e que outras variáveis podem interferir no desenvolvimento do conhecimento linguístico e em sua representação mental. Essas variáveis serão investigadas em nossa pesquisa atual. Em nossas considerações sobre os resultados, salientamos a importância de um modelo capaz de transcender a dicotomia implícito-explícito, tal como o modelo RR, visto que ele é eficiente na explicação dos dados que surgiram a partir das respostas das crianças.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2013-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222Letrônica; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2012): Linguagem e Cognição & A Criação Literária em Processo; 21-44Letrônica; v. 5 n. 3 (2012): Linguagem e Cognição & A Criação Literária em Processo; 21-441984-4301reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222/8831Lorandi, AlineMenezes, Juliana TatschSilva, Itallon LourençoSilva, Liane BarretoMarques, Débora Mattosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-03T13:28:12Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/12222Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2017-03-03T13:28:12letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Linguistic awareness: diferent views
Consciência linguística: diferentes olhares
title Linguistic awareness: diferent views
spellingShingle Linguistic awareness: diferent views
Lorandi, Aline
Language Acquisition
Linguistic Awareness
Representational Redescription model
Morphology
Phonology.
Aquisição da Linguagem
Consciência Linguística
Modelo de Redescrição Representacional
Morfologia
Fonologia.
title_short Linguistic awareness: diferent views
title_full Linguistic awareness: diferent views
title_fullStr Linguistic awareness: diferent views
title_full_unstemmed Linguistic awareness: diferent views
title_sort Linguistic awareness: diferent views
author Lorandi, Aline
author_facet Lorandi, Aline
Menezes, Juliana Tatsch
Silva, Itallon Lourenço
Silva, Liane Barreto
Marques, Débora Mattos
author_role author
author2 Menezes, Juliana Tatsch
Silva, Itallon Lourenço
Silva, Liane Barreto
Marques, Débora Mattos
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lorandi, Aline
Menezes, Juliana Tatsch
Silva, Itallon Lourenço
Silva, Liane Barreto
Marques, Débora Mattos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Language Acquisition
Linguistic Awareness
Representational Redescription model
Morphology
Phonology.
Aquisição da Linguagem
Consciência Linguística
Modelo de Redescrição Representacional
Morfologia
Fonologia.
topic Language Acquisition
Linguistic Awareness
Representational Redescription model
Morphology
Phonology.
Aquisição da Linguagem
Consciência Linguística
Modelo de Redescrição Representacional
Morfologia
Fonologia.
description The present work is a qualitative analysis of data collected during the application of morphological awareness tests, under the light of the Representational Redescription model (KARMILOFF-SMITH, 1986, 1992). These data are from Lorandi (2011). In the present work, we suggest an individual analysis of the responses, not a group analysis as in Lorandi (2011), trying to take into account the developmental trajectory of these participants in relation to their morphological knowledge, or, more specifically, to their skills on derivation, extraction of the base and inflection of nonce words, as well as their judgment on the acceptability of these nonce words, followed by an explanation of their knowledge about real morphemes, which were organized in morphological variant forms that were used by children in the process of morphological acquisition (LORANDI, 2007). We have randomly chosen two participants of each grade – from the 1st to the 4th –, all of them students of a regular school, whose data were analyzed to the purposes of this work. The results show that development is not age-related, a conclusion that is corroborated by the Representational Redescription model, and the results also show that other factors may interfere on the linguistic knowledge development and in its mental representation. These factors will be investigated in our current research. In our considerations about the results, we stress the relevance of a model that is capable of transcending the implicit-explicit dichotomy, as the RR model does, since it is efficient on the explanation of data provided by children.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-03-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222/8831
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Letrônica; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2012): Linguagem e Cognição & A Criação Literária em Processo; 21-44
Letrônica; v. 5 n. 3 (2012): Linguagem e Cognição & A Criação Literária em Processo; 21-44
1984-4301
reponame:letrônica
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str letrônica
collection letrônica
repository.name.fl_str_mv letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com
_version_ 1799128596392968192