Linguistic awareness: diferent views
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | letrônica |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222 |
Resumo: | The present work is a qualitative analysis of data collected during the application of morphological awareness tests, under the light of the Representational Redescription model (KARMILOFF-SMITH, 1986, 1992). These data are from Lorandi (2011). In the present work, we suggest an individual analysis of the responses, not a group analysis as in Lorandi (2011), trying to take into account the developmental trajectory of these participants in relation to their morphological knowledge, or, more specifically, to their skills on derivation, extraction of the base and inflection of nonce words, as well as their judgment on the acceptability of these nonce words, followed by an explanation of their knowledge about real morphemes, which were organized in morphological variant forms that were used by children in the process of morphological acquisition (LORANDI, 2007). We have randomly chosen two participants of each grade – from the 1st to the 4th –, all of them students of a regular school, whose data were analyzed to the purposes of this work. The results show that development is not age-related, a conclusion that is corroborated by the Representational Redescription model, and the results also show that other factors may interfere on the linguistic knowledge development and in its mental representation. These factors will be investigated in our current research. In our considerations about the results, we stress the relevance of a model that is capable of transcending the implicit-explicit dichotomy, as the RR model does, since it is efficient on the explanation of data provided by children. |
id |
PUC_RS-14_41ebfc06c04d6e9b499e6d7ed58caaf4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/12222 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-14 |
network_name_str |
letrônica |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Linguistic awareness: diferent viewsConsciência linguística: diferentes olharesLanguage AcquisitionLinguistic AwarenessRepresentational Redescription modelMorphologyPhonology.Aquisição da LinguagemConsciência LinguísticaModelo de Redescrição RepresentacionalMorfologiaFonologia.The present work is a qualitative analysis of data collected during the application of morphological awareness tests, under the light of the Representational Redescription model (KARMILOFF-SMITH, 1986, 1992). These data are from Lorandi (2011). In the present work, we suggest an individual analysis of the responses, not a group analysis as in Lorandi (2011), trying to take into account the developmental trajectory of these participants in relation to their morphological knowledge, or, more specifically, to their skills on derivation, extraction of the base and inflection of nonce words, as well as their judgment on the acceptability of these nonce words, followed by an explanation of their knowledge about real morphemes, which were organized in morphological variant forms that were used by children in the process of morphological acquisition (LORANDI, 2007). We have randomly chosen two participants of each grade – from the 1st to the 4th –, all of them students of a regular school, whose data were analyzed to the purposes of this work. The results show that development is not age-related, a conclusion that is corroborated by the Representational Redescription model, and the results also show that other factors may interfere on the linguistic knowledge development and in its mental representation. These factors will be investigated in our current research. In our considerations about the results, we stress the relevance of a model that is capable of transcending the implicit-explicit dichotomy, as the RR model does, since it is efficient on the explanation of data provided by children.O presente trabalho objetiva uma análise qualitativa de dados coletados durante a aplicação de testes de consciência morfológica, à luz do modelo de Redescrição Representacional (KARMILOFF-SMITH, 1986, 1992). Esses dados são provenientes do trabalho de tese de Lorandi (2011), para os quais sugerimos uma análise por informante, não por série, como foi feito na tese, visando a uma descrição da trajetória desenvolvimental desses informantes com relação a seu conhecimento morfológico, ou, mais especificamente, as suas habilidades de derivação, extração de base e flexão de pseudopalavras, bem como o julgamento de aceitabilidade, seguido de explanação de conhecimento morfológico de morfemas reais da língua arranjados em formas morfológicas variantes efetivamente utilizadas por crianças em fase de aquisição da morfologia (LORANDI, 2007). Foram destacados aleatoriamente dois informantes de cada série – do 1º ao 4º ano – estudantes de uma escola de ensino regular particular, cujos dados foram analisados para fins deste trabalho. Os resultados mostram que o desenvolvimento não é relativo à idade, o que é corroborado pelo modelo de Redescrição Representacional, e que outras variáveis podem interferir no desenvolvimento do conhecimento linguístico e em sua representação mental. Essas variáveis serão investigadas em nossa pesquisa atual. Em nossas considerações sobre os resultados, salientamos a importância de um modelo capaz de transcender a dicotomia implícito-explícito, tal como o modelo RR, visto que ele é eficiente na explicação dos dados que surgiram a partir das respostas das crianças.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2013-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222Letrônica; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2012): Linguagem e Cognição & A Criação Literária em Processo; 21-44Letrônica; v. 5 n. 3 (2012): Linguagem e Cognição & A Criação Literária em Processo; 21-441984-4301reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222/8831Lorandi, AlineMenezes, Juliana TatschSilva, Itallon LourençoSilva, Liane BarretoMarques, Débora Mattosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-03T13:28:12Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/12222Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2017-03-03T13:28:12letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Linguistic awareness: diferent views Consciência linguística: diferentes olhares |
title |
Linguistic awareness: diferent views |
spellingShingle |
Linguistic awareness: diferent views Lorandi, Aline Language Acquisition Linguistic Awareness Representational Redescription model Morphology Phonology. Aquisição da Linguagem Consciência Linguística Modelo de Redescrição Representacional Morfologia Fonologia. |
title_short |
Linguistic awareness: diferent views |
title_full |
Linguistic awareness: diferent views |
title_fullStr |
Linguistic awareness: diferent views |
title_full_unstemmed |
Linguistic awareness: diferent views |
title_sort |
Linguistic awareness: diferent views |
author |
Lorandi, Aline |
author_facet |
Lorandi, Aline Menezes, Juliana Tatsch Silva, Itallon Lourenço Silva, Liane Barreto Marques, Débora Mattos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Menezes, Juliana Tatsch Silva, Itallon Lourenço Silva, Liane Barreto Marques, Débora Mattos |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lorandi, Aline Menezes, Juliana Tatsch Silva, Itallon Lourenço Silva, Liane Barreto Marques, Débora Mattos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Language Acquisition Linguistic Awareness Representational Redescription model Morphology Phonology. Aquisição da Linguagem Consciência Linguística Modelo de Redescrição Representacional Morfologia Fonologia. |
topic |
Language Acquisition Linguistic Awareness Representational Redescription model Morphology Phonology. Aquisição da Linguagem Consciência Linguística Modelo de Redescrição Representacional Morfologia Fonologia. |
description |
The present work is a qualitative analysis of data collected during the application of morphological awareness tests, under the light of the Representational Redescription model (KARMILOFF-SMITH, 1986, 1992). These data are from Lorandi (2011). In the present work, we suggest an individual analysis of the responses, not a group analysis as in Lorandi (2011), trying to take into account the developmental trajectory of these participants in relation to their morphological knowledge, or, more specifically, to their skills on derivation, extraction of the base and inflection of nonce words, as well as their judgment on the acceptability of these nonce words, followed by an explanation of their knowledge about real morphemes, which were organized in morphological variant forms that were used by children in the process of morphological acquisition (LORANDI, 2007). We have randomly chosen two participants of each grade – from the 1st to the 4th –, all of them students of a regular school, whose data were analyzed to the purposes of this work. The results show that development is not age-related, a conclusion that is corroborated by the Representational Redescription model, and the results also show that other factors may interfere on the linguistic knowledge development and in its mental representation. These factors will be investigated in our current research. In our considerations about the results, we stress the relevance of a model that is capable of transcending the implicit-explicit dichotomy, as the RR model does, since it is efficient on the explanation of data provided by children. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-03-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/12222/8831 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Letrônica; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2012): Linguagem e Cognição & A Criação Literária em Processo; 21-44 Letrônica; v. 5 n. 3 (2012): Linguagem e Cognição & A Criação Literária em Processo; 21-44 1984-4301 reponame:letrônica instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
letrônica |
collection |
letrônica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799128596392968192 |