“Romance sem romance”: the case of "Água Viva", by Clarice Lispector

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Matos, Anderson Hakenhoar
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: letrônica
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/5103
Resumo: In the 20th century, modern art denies the bond with the temporal and spatial world which was taken as real and absolute by traditional realism and by the common sense. Anatol Rosenfeld defends that modern novel is born when Proust, Joyce, and others, begin to ‘a desfazer a ordem cronológica, fundindo passado, presente e futuro’ (1973, p. 80). He also affirms that modern novel, like painting, is no longer mimetic, ‘recusando a função de reproduzir ou copiar a realidade empírica’ (ibidem, p. 76). According to him, realism, in the broadest sense of the term of designating a tendency of reproducing the apprehended reality by our senses, in a stylized way or not, idealized or not, is denied by modern novel. Therefore, the chronology and temporal continuity were shaken. Água Viva, on the contrary of a realistic novel, seems fragmented and/or not structured. A realistic novel presents a story based on chronologies, events, well defined characters, etc. Nevertheless, this scheme is not possible in Água Viva. The text of Lispector presents the characteristics of modern novel proposed by Rosenfeld (1973), which can be attributed to the intense relation with painting; however, Lispector goes beyond, and her text is characterized as “novel without novel” by Lucia Helena, using a terminology proposed by Barthes. From these considerations results the proposal of this work, which does not have as objective an attempt of the classification of the text of Lispector, but present a brief study related to some characteristics of modern novel proposed by Rosenfeld and the case of Água Viva, in a way to understand how the representation of reality is in the “Lispectorian” text.
id PUC_RS-14_6f31df78b72f89cf46d2419e16372a9f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/5103
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-14
network_name_str letrônica
repository_id_str
spelling “Romance sem romance”: the case of "Água Viva", by Clarice Lispector“Romance sem romance”: o caso de Água Viva de Clarice LispectorClarice LispectorÁgua Viva Romance modernoPintura.In the 20th century, modern art denies the bond with the temporal and spatial world which was taken as real and absolute by traditional realism and by the common sense. Anatol Rosenfeld defends that modern novel is born when Proust, Joyce, and others, begin to ‘a desfazer a ordem cronológica, fundindo passado, presente e futuro’ (1973, p. 80). He also affirms that modern novel, like painting, is no longer mimetic, ‘recusando a função de reproduzir ou copiar a realidade empírica’ (ibidem, p. 76). According to him, realism, in the broadest sense of the term of designating a tendency of reproducing the apprehended reality by our senses, in a stylized way or not, idealized or not, is denied by modern novel. Therefore, the chronology and temporal continuity were shaken. Água Viva, on the contrary of a realistic novel, seems fragmented and/or not structured. A realistic novel presents a story based on chronologies, events, well defined characters, etc. Nevertheless, this scheme is not possible in Água Viva. The text of Lispector presents the characteristics of modern novel proposed by Rosenfeld (1973), which can be attributed to the intense relation with painting; however, Lispector goes beyond, and her text is characterized as “novel without novel” by Lucia Helena, using a terminology proposed by Barthes. From these considerations results the proposal of this work, which does not have as objective an attempt of the classification of the text of Lispector, but present a brief study related to some characteristics of modern novel proposed by Rosenfeld and the case of Água Viva, in a way to understand how the representation of reality is in the “Lispectorian” text.No século XX, a arte moderna nega o vínculo com o mundo temporal e espacial posto como real e absoluto pelo realismo tradicional e pelo senso comum. Anatol Rosenfeld defende que o romance moderno nasce quando Proust, Joyce, entre outros, começam “a desfazer a ordem cronológica, fundindo passado, presente e futuro” (1973, p. 80). Afirma também que o romance moderno, assim como a pintura, deixou de ser mimético, “recusando a função de reproduzir ou copiar a realidade empírica” (ibidem, p. 76). Segundo ele, o realismo, no sentido mais lato do termo de designar a tendência de reproduzir, de uma forma estilizada ou não, idealizada ou não, a realidade apreendida pelos nossos sentidos, é negado pelo romance moderno, o que o crítico chama de “desrealização”. A eliminação do espaço, ou da ilusão do espaço, na pintura corresponde a da sucessão temporal no romance. Assim, a cronologia e a continuidade temporal foram abaladas. Água Viva , ao contrário de um romance realista, parece fragmentado e/ou desestruturado. Um romance realista apresenta uma história baseada em cronologias, eventos, personagens bem definidos, etc. Porém, este esquema já não é mais possível em Água Viva . O texto de Lispector apresenta as características do romance moderno proposto por Rosenfield (1973), o que pode ser atribuído à intensa relação com a pintura; no entanto, Lispector vai além, e seu texto é caracterizado como “romance sem romance” por Lucia Helena, utilizando a terminologia proposta por Barthes. Resulta dessas considerações a proposta deste trabalho, que não tem por objetivo uma tentativa de classificação do texto de Lispector, mas apresentar um breve estudo a respeito de algumas características do romance moderno propostas por Rosenfield e o caso de Água Viva, a fim de entender como é a representação da realidade no texto Lispectoriano.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2009-07-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/5103Letrônica; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2009): Linguagem e Cognição & Introspecção; 306-316Letrônica; v. 2 n. 1 (2009): Linguagem e Cognição & Introspecção; 306-3161984-4301reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/5103/4047Matos, Anderson Hakenhoarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-06T18:54:44Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/5103Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2017-03-06T18:54:44letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “Romance sem romance”: the case of "Água Viva", by Clarice Lispector
“Romance sem romance”: o caso de Água Viva de Clarice Lispector
title “Romance sem romance”: the case of "Água Viva", by Clarice Lispector
spellingShingle “Romance sem romance”: the case of "Água Viva", by Clarice Lispector
Matos, Anderson Hakenhoar
Clarice Lispector
Água Viva
Romance moderno
Pintura.
title_short “Romance sem romance”: the case of "Água Viva", by Clarice Lispector
title_full “Romance sem romance”: the case of "Água Viva", by Clarice Lispector
title_fullStr “Romance sem romance”: the case of "Água Viva", by Clarice Lispector
title_full_unstemmed “Romance sem romance”: the case of "Água Viva", by Clarice Lispector
title_sort “Romance sem romance”: the case of "Água Viva", by Clarice Lispector
author Matos, Anderson Hakenhoar
author_facet Matos, Anderson Hakenhoar
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Matos, Anderson Hakenhoar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Clarice Lispector
Água Viva
Romance moderno
Pintura.
topic Clarice Lispector
Água Viva
Romance moderno
Pintura.
description In the 20th century, modern art denies the bond with the temporal and spatial world which was taken as real and absolute by traditional realism and by the common sense. Anatol Rosenfeld defends that modern novel is born when Proust, Joyce, and others, begin to ‘a desfazer a ordem cronológica, fundindo passado, presente e futuro’ (1973, p. 80). He also affirms that modern novel, like painting, is no longer mimetic, ‘recusando a função de reproduzir ou copiar a realidade empírica’ (ibidem, p. 76). According to him, realism, in the broadest sense of the term of designating a tendency of reproducing the apprehended reality by our senses, in a stylized way or not, idealized or not, is denied by modern novel. Therefore, the chronology and temporal continuity were shaken. Água Viva, on the contrary of a realistic novel, seems fragmented and/or not structured. A realistic novel presents a story based on chronologies, events, well defined characters, etc. Nevertheless, this scheme is not possible in Água Viva. The text of Lispector presents the characteristics of modern novel proposed by Rosenfeld (1973), which can be attributed to the intense relation with painting; however, Lispector goes beyond, and her text is characterized as “novel without novel” by Lucia Helena, using a terminology proposed by Barthes. From these considerations results the proposal of this work, which does not have as objective an attempt of the classification of the text of Lispector, but present a brief study related to some characteristics of modern novel proposed by Rosenfeld and the case of Água Viva, in a way to understand how the representation of reality is in the “Lispectorian” text.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-07-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/5103
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/5103
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/5103/4047
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Letrônica; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2009): Linguagem e Cognição & Introspecção; 306-316
Letrônica; v. 2 n. 1 (2009): Linguagem e Cognição & Introspecção; 306-316
1984-4301
reponame:letrônica
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str letrônica
collection letrônica
repository.name.fl_str_mv letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com
_version_ 1752127640946343936