Reading and writing: a joint process based on an unavoidable complicity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Maria da Graça Lisboa Castro
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Letras de Hoje (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/11883
Resumo: This paper aims to show the opportunity and relevance of the topic proposed (“Research and teaching of reading and writing: psycholinguistic studies”) in early and more advanced moments of the use of reading and writing. It further intends to: underline the added value of a psycholinguistic approach to the abovementioned activities/skills; stress the cognitive, neurological and linguistic framework judged to be necessary to enter the world of writing; discuss the “Matthew effect” in order to counteract its more popular and perhaps “punitive” interpretation when it is taken in a more generalized manner; and, finally, to highlight the importance of revising writing mainly by means of three of the eight moments of Richard Lanham’s (2006) Paramedic Method, based on excerpts of texts written by university students. The need, at an academic level, to encourage students to feel the unavoidable complicity between reading and writing becomes reinforced with the transcription of a personal account by a Master’s student, who was able to take full advantage of the methodology followed in the course Psycholinguistics and the Teaching of Languages lectured by the author of this paper at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Porto.
id PUC_RS-19_e73a2343f30d666d7365afb9827a8288
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/11883
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-19
network_name_str Letras de Hoje (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reading and writing: a joint process based on an unavoidable complicityA leitura e a escrita: um processo conjunto assente numa inevitável cumplicidadeReadingwritingComplicityLevels of teachingPsycholinguisticsLeituraescritaCumplicidadeNíveis de ensinoPsicolinguísticaThis paper aims to show the opportunity and relevance of the topic proposed (“Research and teaching of reading and writing: psycholinguistic studies”) in early and more advanced moments of the use of reading and writing. It further intends to: underline the added value of a psycholinguistic approach to the abovementioned activities/skills; stress the cognitive, neurological and linguistic framework judged to be necessary to enter the world of writing; discuss the “Matthew effect” in order to counteract its more popular and perhaps “punitive” interpretation when it is taken in a more generalized manner; and, finally, to highlight the importance of revising writing mainly by means of three of the eight moments of Richard Lanham’s (2006) Paramedic Method, based on excerpts of texts written by university students. The need, at an academic level, to encourage students to feel the unavoidable complicity between reading and writing becomes reinforced with the transcription of a personal account by a Master’s student, who was able to take full advantage of the methodology followed in the course Psycholinguistics and the Teaching of Languages lectured by the author of this paper at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Porto.Neste texto, procura-se mostrar a atualidade e pertinência do tema que nos foi proposto (“Research and teaching of reading and writing: psycholinguistic strudies”) em momentos iniciais e mais avançados do uso da leitura e da escrita. Além disso, salienta-se a mais-valia de uma abordagem psicolinguística a estas duas atividades/habilidades; realça-se o enquadramento cognitivo, neurológico e linguístico que se estima essencial para a entrada no mundo da escrita; problematiza-se o “efeito Mateus” com o fim de contrariar a sua interpretação mais popular e porventura “penalizadora” quando demasiado generalizada e, por último, com recurso a fragmentos de textos escritos por estudantes universitários, evidencia-se a importância de partir para uma revisão da escrita apoiada sobretudo em três dos oito momentos do “Paramedic Method” de Richard Lanham (2006). A necessidade de, a nível académico, fazer com que os estudantes sintam uma inevitável cumplicidade entre a leitura e a escrita sai reforçada com a transcrição do testemunho de uma estudante de Mestrado que soube tirar o melhor partido da metodologia seguida na unidade curricular Psicolinguística e Ensino de Línguas lecionada pela signatária deste texto na Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2013-04-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionLinguística Aplicadaapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/11883Letras de Hoje; Vol. 48 No. 1 (2013): Research and Teaching of Reading and Writing: Psycholinguistic Studies; 116-126Letras de Hoje; Vol. 48 Núm. 1 (2013): Pesquisa e Ensino da Leitura e da Escrita: Estudos Psicolinguísticos; 116-126Letras de Hoje; v. 48 n. 1 (2013): Pesquisa e Ensino da Leitura e da Escrita: Estudos Psicolinguísticos; 116-1261984-77260101-3335reponame:Letras de Hoje (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/11883/8889Pinto, Maria da Graça Lisboa Castroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-03T13:20:40Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/11883Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/falePRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/oaieditora.periodicos@pucrs.br || letrasdehoje@pucrs.br1984-77260101-3335opendoar:2021-05-03T13:20:40Letras de Hoje (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reading and writing: a joint process based on an unavoidable complicity
A leitura e a escrita: um processo conjunto assente numa inevitável cumplicidade
title Reading and writing: a joint process based on an unavoidable complicity
spellingShingle Reading and writing: a joint process based on an unavoidable complicity
Pinto, Maria da Graça Lisboa Castro
Reading
writing
Complicity
Levels of teaching
Psycholinguistics
Leitura
escrita
Cumplicidade
Níveis de ensino
Psicolinguística
title_short Reading and writing: a joint process based on an unavoidable complicity
title_full Reading and writing: a joint process based on an unavoidable complicity
title_fullStr Reading and writing: a joint process based on an unavoidable complicity
title_full_unstemmed Reading and writing: a joint process based on an unavoidable complicity
title_sort Reading and writing: a joint process based on an unavoidable complicity
author Pinto, Maria da Graça Lisboa Castro
author_facet Pinto, Maria da Graça Lisboa Castro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Maria da Graça Lisboa Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reading
writing
Complicity
Levels of teaching
Psycholinguistics
Leitura
escrita
Cumplicidade
Níveis de ensino
Psicolinguística
topic Reading
writing
Complicity
Levels of teaching
Psycholinguistics
Leitura
escrita
Cumplicidade
Níveis de ensino
Psicolinguística
description This paper aims to show the opportunity and relevance of the topic proposed (“Research and teaching of reading and writing: psycholinguistic studies”) in early and more advanced moments of the use of reading and writing. It further intends to: underline the added value of a psycholinguistic approach to the abovementioned activities/skills; stress the cognitive, neurological and linguistic framework judged to be necessary to enter the world of writing; discuss the “Matthew effect” in order to counteract its more popular and perhaps “punitive” interpretation when it is taken in a more generalized manner; and, finally, to highlight the importance of revising writing mainly by means of three of the eight moments of Richard Lanham’s (2006) Paramedic Method, based on excerpts of texts written by university students. The need, at an academic level, to encourage students to feel the unavoidable complicity between reading and writing becomes reinforced with the transcription of a personal account by a Master’s student, who was able to take full advantage of the methodology followed in the course Psycholinguistics and the Teaching of Languages lectured by the author of this paper at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Porto.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-04-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Linguística Aplicada
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/11883
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/11883
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/11883/8889
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Letras de Hoje; Vol. 48 No. 1 (2013): Research and Teaching of Reading and Writing: Psycholinguistic Studies; 116-126
Letras de Hoje; Vol. 48 Núm. 1 (2013): Pesquisa e Ensino da Leitura e da Escrita: Estudos Psicolinguísticos; 116-126
Letras de Hoje; v. 48 n. 1 (2013): Pesquisa e Ensino da Leitura e da Escrita: Estudos Psicolinguísticos; 116-126
1984-7726
0101-3335
reponame:Letras de Hoje (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Letras de Hoje (Online)
collection Letras de Hoje (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Letras de Hoje (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editora.periodicos@pucrs.br || letrasdehoje@pucrs.br
_version_ 1752127809954775040