Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Savoia, Francisco Simões Pacheco
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
Texto Completo: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20987
Resumo: The award-winning collaboration had a procedural regulation by the new criminal organizational law 12.850/2013, and there on, has been broadly debated, especially when its utilization is concerned, in large investigations conducted by police officials, as a means of evidence obstruction. For this reason, reinforce the debate around gaps and controversial issues mentioned in this law, so that the institute be applied in conformity with the federal constitution, and is increasingly solidified in the procedural system. It is worth noting that the analysis of this institute in impartiality with the judge, especially in view of the development of the international courts of human rights. In this manner, the analysis falls on the performance within the procedure of collaboration, to determine whether assurance of the judge's impartiality are violated when the judge who sentenced the case is the same one who acts in the investigation phase, and who ratifies the awarded agreement. Some alternate routes are pointed out with the purpose of constructing a better adaptation of the procedure to guarantee impartiality, by avoiding allegations of inconsistencies and illegalities. Thus, intends are to prioritize the findings and solutions that best match the principles that underlie the democratic state of law and the protection of human dignity
id PUC_SP-1_a843936fd5fcde6a31ee54fdb6ac8dab
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/20987
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
repository_id_str
spelling Arruda, Eloisa de Sousahttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4835269A3Savoia, Francisco Simões Pacheco2018-04-09T13:03:00Z2020-05-112018-03-06Savoia, Francisco Simões Pacheco. Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade. 2017. 202 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2017.https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20987The award-winning collaboration had a procedural regulation by the new criminal organizational law 12.850/2013, and there on, has been broadly debated, especially when its utilization is concerned, in large investigations conducted by police officials, as a means of evidence obstruction. For this reason, reinforce the debate around gaps and controversial issues mentioned in this law, so that the institute be applied in conformity with the federal constitution, and is increasingly solidified in the procedural system. It is worth noting that the analysis of this institute in impartiality with the judge, especially in view of the development of the international courts of human rights. In this manner, the analysis falls on the performance within the procedure of collaboration, to determine whether assurance of the judge's impartiality are violated when the judge who sentenced the case is the same one who acts in the investigation phase, and who ratifies the awarded agreement. Some alternate routes are pointed out with the purpose of constructing a better adaptation of the procedure to guarantee impartiality, by avoiding allegations of inconsistencies and illegalities. Thus, intends are to prioritize the findings and solutions that best match the principles that underlie the democratic state of law and the protection of human dignityA colaboração premiada teve seu procedimento regulamentado pela nova Lei de Organização Criminosa – Lei 12.850/2013 – e, desde então, tem sido amplamente debatida, principalmente em razão da sua utilização, nas grandes investigações policiais, como principal meio de obtenção de provas. Por isso, salutar o debate em torno das lacunas e dos pontos controversos da referida lei para que o instituto seja aplicado em conformidade com a Constituição Federal e se solidifique no sistema processual cada vez mais. Destaca-se a análise do referido instituto diante da garantia da imparcialidade do juiz, principalmente diante do desenvolvimento traçado pelas Cortes Internacionais de Direitos Humanos. Desta forma, a análise recai sobre a atuação do juiz dentro do procedimento da colaboração para questionar se garantia da imparcialidade do juiz é violada quando o juiz que sentencia o processo é o mesmo que atua na fase da investigação e que homologa o acordo de colaboração premiada. Alguns caminhos alternativos são apontados com a finalidade de construir uma melhor adequação do procedimento à garantia da imparcialidade visando evitar alegações de inconstitucionalidades e ilegalidades. Portanto, pretende-se priorizar as constatações e soluções que melhor se coadunam com as normas principiológicas que prestigiem os fins do Estado Democrático de Direito e da proteção da dignidade humanaapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucsp.br/tede/retrieve/45212/Francisco%20Sim%c3%b5es%20Pacheco%20Savoia.pdf.jpgporPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloPrograma de Estudos Pós-Graduados em DireitoPUC-SPBrasilFaculdade de DireitoDelação premiada (Processo penal) - BrasilBrasil. [Lei n. 12.850, de 2 de agosto de 2013]Processo Penal - BrasilImparcialidade (Direito)Awarded award (Criminal proceedings)Brazil. [Lei n. 12.850, de 2 de agosto de 2013]Criminal procedure - BrazilFair trialCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOColaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SPinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPTEXTFrancisco Simões Pacheco Savoia.pdf.txtFrancisco Simões Pacheco Savoia.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain455621https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20987/4/Francisco%20Sim%c3%b5es%20Pacheco%20Savoia.pdf.txt8eb29375a321aac4ee598b8ef42e7e8aMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20987/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALFrancisco Simões Pacheco Savoia.pdfFrancisco Simões Pacheco Savoia.pdfapplication/pdf1049750https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20987/2/Francisco%20Sim%c3%b5es%20Pacheco%20Savoia.pdffea2a78c3b006b831736d7155fcd6ac9MD52THUMBNAILFrancisco Simões Pacheco Savoia.pdf.jpgFrancisco Simões Pacheco Savoia.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3161https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20987/3/Francisco%20Sim%c3%b5es%20Pacheco%20Savoia.pdf.jpg7390e541e61d55f8d4cb688a356293bdMD53handle/209872022-08-22 18:11:22.145oai:repositorio.pucsp.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://sapientia.pucsp.br/https://sapientia.pucsp.br/oai/requestbngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.bropendoar:2022-08-22T21:11:22Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade
title Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade
spellingShingle Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade
Savoia, Francisco Simões Pacheco
Delação premiada (Processo penal) - Brasil
Brasil. [Lei n. 12.850, de 2 de agosto de 2013]
Processo Penal - Brasil
Imparcialidade (Direito)
Awarded award (Criminal proceedings)
Brazil. [Lei n. 12.850, de 2 de agosto de 2013]
Criminal procedure - Brazil
Fair trial
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade
title_full Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade
title_fullStr Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade
title_full_unstemmed Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade
title_sort Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade
author Savoia, Francisco Simões Pacheco
author_facet Savoia, Francisco Simões Pacheco
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Arruda, Eloisa de Sousa
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4835269A3
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Savoia, Francisco Simões Pacheco
contributor_str_mv Arruda, Eloisa de Sousa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Delação premiada (Processo penal) - Brasil
Brasil. [Lei n. 12.850, de 2 de agosto de 2013]
Processo Penal - Brasil
Imparcialidade (Direito)
topic Delação premiada (Processo penal) - Brasil
Brasil. [Lei n. 12.850, de 2 de agosto de 2013]
Processo Penal - Brasil
Imparcialidade (Direito)
Awarded award (Criminal proceedings)
Brazil. [Lei n. 12.850, de 2 de agosto de 2013]
Criminal procedure - Brazil
Fair trial
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Awarded award (Criminal proceedings)
Brazil. [Lei n. 12.850, de 2 de agosto de 2013]
Criminal procedure - Brazil
Fair trial
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description The award-winning collaboration had a procedural regulation by the new criminal organizational law 12.850/2013, and there on, has been broadly debated, especially when its utilization is concerned, in large investigations conducted by police officials, as a means of evidence obstruction. For this reason, reinforce the debate around gaps and controversial issues mentioned in this law, so that the institute be applied in conformity with the federal constitution, and is increasingly solidified in the procedural system. It is worth noting that the analysis of this institute in impartiality with the judge, especially in view of the development of the international courts of human rights. In this manner, the analysis falls on the performance within the procedure of collaboration, to determine whether assurance of the judge's impartiality are violated when the judge who sentenced the case is the same one who acts in the investigation phase, and who ratifies the awarded agreement. Some alternate routes are pointed out with the purpose of constructing a better adaptation of the procedure to guarantee impartiality, by avoiding allegations of inconsistencies and illegalities. Thus, intends are to prioritize the findings and solutions that best match the principles that underlie the democratic state of law and the protection of human dignity
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-04-09T13:03:00Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-03-06
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-05-11
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Savoia, Francisco Simões Pacheco. Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade. 2017. 202 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20987
identifier_str_mv Savoia, Francisco Simões Pacheco. Colaboração premiada e o princípio da imparcialidade. 2017. 202 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2017.
url https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20987
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUC-SP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20987/4/Francisco%20Sim%c3%b5es%20Pacheco%20Savoia.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20987/1/license.txt
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20987/2/Francisco%20Sim%c3%b5es%20Pacheco%20Savoia.pdf
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20987/3/Francisco%20Sim%c3%b5es%20Pacheco%20Savoia.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8eb29375a321aac4ee598b8ef42e7e8a
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
fea2a78c3b006b831736d7155fcd6ac9
7390e541e61d55f8d4cb688a356293bd
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bngkatende@pucsp.br||rapassi@pucsp.br
_version_ 1809277876664532992