O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
Texto Completo: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/2884 |
Resumo: | This paper deals with the concept of "self" in the "critical" period of Immanuel Kant's theoretical philosophy. The analysis focuses on the Critique of Pure Reason text. Drawing a distinction between empirical, rational and transcendental psychology (to which the paradigm of analysis of Kant belongs), it begins with an attempt to determine cognitive subject's place and character in the genesis of the transcendental epistemology. Pointing out the essentiality of the psychological aspects to a correct textual interpretation, even when they refer to transcendental psychology, it supports the idea that a purely semantic analysis of the Critique of Pure Reason text cannot lead to a legitimate interpretation. Subsequently, a description of the transcendental idealism doctrine is presented, in which the differences between the transcendental and realistic (or transcendent) perspectives are discussed, followed by the rise of two different ways to understand objects: as phenomenon and as noumenon. Following that, an analysis on the limits of knowledge is developed, also centering on ways of thinking the theory's subject itself in relation to those limits. Three distinct perspectives of the "self" approach arise: phenomenal self, transcendental self and noumenal self, each one's analysis being presented separately. Firstly, the phenomenal self and the relation between the intuition of space and time as an essential factor to think the unity of time in a continuous timeline, on which one can identify the chronological sequence of events and that allows us to reflect on the empirical permanency of the "self" in inner sense; secondly, the analysis of the transcendental self, which begins with a basic introduction to the faculty of understanding, its spontaneity and the synthesis ability and its importance to theme comprehension and finally brings up the concept of transcendental apperception and the distinction between conscience's unity and conscience's identity, from which our transcendental concept of "self" can be determined. The analysis also deals with four critics' (Strawson, Henrich, Pippin and Patricia Kitcher) view on transcendental apperception and conscience's identity; lastly, the noumenal self and the psychological understanding of "soul", according to its two kinds of use: constitutive and regulative. |
id |
P_RS_6c512c5312d2db474fa202f0712e4300 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/2884 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Luft, EduardoCPF:54093902020http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4798082T2CPF:00870151029http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4440183H7Kurle, Adriano Bueno2015-04-14T13:55:12Z2012-03-162012-03-05KURLE, Adriano Bueno. O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant. 2012. 115 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/2884This paper deals with the concept of "self" in the "critical" period of Immanuel Kant's theoretical philosophy. The analysis focuses on the Critique of Pure Reason text. Drawing a distinction between empirical, rational and transcendental psychology (to which the paradigm of analysis of Kant belongs), it begins with an attempt to determine cognitive subject's place and character in the genesis of the transcendental epistemology. Pointing out the essentiality of the psychological aspects to a correct textual interpretation, even when they refer to transcendental psychology, it supports the idea that a purely semantic analysis of the Critique of Pure Reason text cannot lead to a legitimate interpretation. Subsequently, a description of the transcendental idealism doctrine is presented, in which the differences between the transcendental and realistic (or transcendent) perspectives are discussed, followed by the rise of two different ways to understand objects: as phenomenon and as noumenon. Following that, an analysis on the limits of knowledge is developed, also centering on ways of thinking the theory's subject itself in relation to those limits. Three distinct perspectives of the "self" approach arise: phenomenal self, transcendental self and noumenal self, each one's analysis being presented separately. Firstly, the phenomenal self and the relation between the intuition of space and time as an essential factor to think the unity of time in a continuous timeline, on which one can identify the chronological sequence of events and that allows us to reflect on the empirical permanency of the "self" in inner sense; secondly, the analysis of the transcendental self, which begins with a basic introduction to the faculty of understanding, its spontaneity and the synthesis ability and its importance to theme comprehension and finally brings up the concept of transcendental apperception and the distinction between conscience's unity and conscience's identity, from which our transcendental concept of "self" can be determined. The analysis also deals with four critics' (Strawson, Henrich, Pippin and Patricia Kitcher) view on transcendental apperception and conscience's identity; lastly, the noumenal self and the psychological understanding of "soul", according to its two kinds of use: constitutive and regulative.Neste trabalho abordamos a concep??o de eu na filosofia te?rica do per?odo chamado cr?tico da filosofia de Immanuel Kant. Para tanto, focamos nossa an?lise no texto da Cr?tica da Raz?o Pura. Iniciamos pela tentativa de determinar o lugar e o car?ter do sujeito cognitivo no ponto de partida da constru??o epist?mica transcendental, distinguindo entre psicologia emp?rica, psicologia racional e psicologia transcendental, pertencendo a esta ?ltima o paradigma de an?lise de Kant. Apontamos para a impossibilidade de interpretar corretamente o texto sem que se leve em considera??o os aspectos psicologistas, ainda que esta psicologia seja a de car?ter transcendental. Assim, negamos que a possibilidade de uma an?lise puramente sem?ntica do texto da Cr?tica da Raz?o Pura seja uma alternativa vi?vel para uma interpreta??o leg?tima. Partimos posteriormente para a descri??o da doutrina do idealismo transcendental, onde se trata da diferen?a da perspectiva transcendental da perspectiva realista ou transcendente, por onde aparecer?o duas perspectivas distintas para o conhecimento de objetos: como fen?meno e como n?meno. Seguindo, trataremos sobre os limites do conhecimento e como podemos pensar o sujeito da teoria diante destes limites propostos. Ent?o surge uma tripla distin??o das diferentes perspectivas da abordagem do eu : eu fenom?nico, eu transcendental e eu num?nico. Disto trabalharemos cada uma destas tr?s perspectivas, tratando primeiramente do eu fenom?nico e da rela??o entre a intui??o do espa?o e do tempo como condi??o para pensar a unidade do tempo em uma linha cont?nua temporal, de onde se distingue a sucess?o dos eventos temporais e que pode servir para pensar a perman?ncia emp?rica do eu no sentido interno. Depois tratamos do eu transcendental, iniciando com alguns esclarecimentos b?sicos sobre a faculdade do entendimento, seu car?ter espont?neo, a capacidade de s?ntese e a sua import?ncia para compreender o tema, para finalmente tratarmos do conceito de apercep??o transcendental e da distin??o entre a unidade e a identidade da consci?ncia, a partir da qual podemos definir o nosso conceito transcendental de eu. Ainda nesta an?lise, abordamos a leitura de quatro comentadores (Strawson, Henrich, Pippin e Patricia Kitcher) sobre a apercep??o transcendental e a identidade da consci?ncia. Por t?rmino, tratamos do eu num?nico e da ideia psicol?gica de alma, de acordo com os dois usos poss?veis: o constitutivo e o regulativo.Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:55:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 437406.pdf: 726488 bytes, checksum: b05b0e2f3f2f3fe7e5bcf26c74468349 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-03-05application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/11980/437406.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em FilosofiaPUCRSBRFaculdade de Filosofia e Ci?ncias HumanasFILOSOFIA ALEM?FILOSOFIA CR?TICAFILOSOFIA TRANSCENDENTALKANT, IMMANUEL - CR?TICA E INTERPRETA??OCR?TICA DA RAZ?O PURA - CR?TICA E INTERPRETA??OCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAO conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kantinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-83053276064321663935006001531447313960029988info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAIL437406.pdf.jpg437406.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg3171http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/2884/3/437406.pdf.jpg1b9ec4a33dd7f5ee7fad65fc0e753135MD53TEXT437406.pdf.txt437406.pdf.txttext/plain281044http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/2884/2/437406.pdf.txt7cfa5e303b03699d1767f9a79e5c5139MD52ORIGINAL437406.pdfapplication/pdf726488http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/2884/1/437406.pdfb05b0e2f3f2f3fe7e5bcf26c74468349MD51tede/28842015-04-30 08:15:36.845oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/2884Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2015-04-30T11:15:36Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant |
title |
O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant |
spellingShingle |
O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant Kurle, Adriano Bueno FILOSOFIA ALEM? FILOSOFIA CR?TICA FILOSOFIA TRANSCENDENTAL KANT, IMMANUEL - CR?TICA E INTERPRETA??O CR?TICA DA RAZ?O PURA - CR?TICA E INTERPRETA??O CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant |
title_full |
O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant |
title_fullStr |
O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant |
title_full_unstemmed |
O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant |
title_sort |
O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant |
author |
Kurle, Adriano Bueno |
author_facet |
Kurle, Adriano Bueno |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Luft, Eduardo |
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:54093902020 |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4798082T2 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:00870151029 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4440183H7 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kurle, Adriano Bueno |
contributor_str_mv |
Luft, Eduardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
FILOSOFIA ALEM? FILOSOFIA CR?TICA FILOSOFIA TRANSCENDENTAL KANT, IMMANUEL - CR?TICA E INTERPRETA??O CR?TICA DA RAZ?O PURA - CR?TICA E INTERPRETA??O |
topic |
FILOSOFIA ALEM? FILOSOFIA CR?TICA FILOSOFIA TRANSCENDENTAL KANT, IMMANUEL - CR?TICA E INTERPRETA??O CR?TICA DA RAZ?O PURA - CR?TICA E INTERPRETA??O CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
This paper deals with the concept of "self" in the "critical" period of Immanuel Kant's theoretical philosophy. The analysis focuses on the Critique of Pure Reason text. Drawing a distinction between empirical, rational and transcendental psychology (to which the paradigm of analysis of Kant belongs), it begins with an attempt to determine cognitive subject's place and character in the genesis of the transcendental epistemology. Pointing out the essentiality of the psychological aspects to a correct textual interpretation, even when they refer to transcendental psychology, it supports the idea that a purely semantic analysis of the Critique of Pure Reason text cannot lead to a legitimate interpretation. Subsequently, a description of the transcendental idealism doctrine is presented, in which the differences between the transcendental and realistic (or transcendent) perspectives are discussed, followed by the rise of two different ways to understand objects: as phenomenon and as noumenon. Following that, an analysis on the limits of knowledge is developed, also centering on ways of thinking the theory's subject itself in relation to those limits. Three distinct perspectives of the "self" approach arise: phenomenal self, transcendental self and noumenal self, each one's analysis being presented separately. Firstly, the phenomenal self and the relation between the intuition of space and time as an essential factor to think the unity of time in a continuous timeline, on which one can identify the chronological sequence of events and that allows us to reflect on the empirical permanency of the "self" in inner sense; secondly, the analysis of the transcendental self, which begins with a basic introduction to the faculty of understanding, its spontaneity and the synthesis ability and its importance to theme comprehension and finally brings up the concept of transcendental apperception and the distinction between conscience's unity and conscience's identity, from which our transcendental concept of "self" can be determined. The analysis also deals with four critics' (Strawson, Henrich, Pippin and Patricia Kitcher) view on transcendental apperception and conscience's identity; lastly, the noumenal self and the psychological understanding of "soul", according to its two kinds of use: constitutive and regulative. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2012-03-16 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2012-03-05 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2015-04-14T13:55:12Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
KURLE, Adriano Bueno. O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant. 2012. 115 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/2884 |
identifier_str_mv |
KURLE, Adriano Bueno. O conceito de eu na filosofia cr?tica te?rica de Kant. 2012. 115 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012. |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/2884 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-8305327606432166393 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
1531447313960029988 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ci?ncias Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/2884/3/437406.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/2884/2/437406.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/2884/1/437406.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
1b9ec4a33dd7f5ee7fad65fc0e753135 7cfa5e303b03699d1767f9a79e5c5139 b05b0e2f3f2f3fe7e5bcf26c74468349 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1796793070762590208 |