Para al?m da escolha individual : um modelo de escolha social justificada
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
Texto Completo: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8717 |
Resumo: | The present thesis is an optimistic proposition of a social choice model that is able to maintain the formal power of logical analysis present on the mechanisms of choice without losing sight of the most basic philosophical arguments about just social life. It is the search for a solution that better fits the social reality in face of the apparent failure of the current mechanisms of election in contemporary democratic societies. For this, it is necessary to carefully evaluate the conditions of rationality, considering the system of requirements established in Social Choice Theory, searching for a viable answer that translates a true social choice and not just a sum of individual choices. In the meantime, it is necessary to evaluate the possibility of cooperation, given the individual concessions that must take place in a model of social choice. In the search for the translation of the individual will in intersubjective terms, to analyze and understand the reason that lead the individual to cooperate, becomes a fundamental question. A theory of the evolution of cooperation, helps us to understand what leads the individual to give up the purely selfish position without losing sight of the inherent rationality of individual choice. The solution that is presented is a two step procedure. The first step is to establish a cooperative equilibrium. The second is the maintenance and rebalancing of the established cooperation. For the second part of the procedure the model chosen is the discursive model of reciprocal justification as an alternative to print autonomous, cooperative and nonauthoritarian decisions. In this model there must be always open space for deliberation and a justified rationality that guarantees autonomy, not arbitrariness and that serves, analogously, as a main strategy to curb noncooperative action. Justification, in these terms, is considered not only as a right (Recht auf Rechtfertigung), but as a reciprocal duty, aiming to fill the information deficit in decision making. The approach of justified and reciprocal choice proposed here functions as a central planner who, with the statements of the agents themselves, is able to better evaluate the rationality that informs the social decision and may even foresee and detect any errors and anomalies, both in the selection process as in the results of the choice. |
id |
P_RS_d67a260a82bb370327263c1176c586db |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8717 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Oliveira, Nythamar Hil?rio dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3541527557611037http://lattes.cnpq.br/2141247409019428Ferreira, Carlos Roberto Bueno2019-06-14T19:11:05Z2019-03-25http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8717The present thesis is an optimistic proposition of a social choice model that is able to maintain the formal power of logical analysis present on the mechanisms of choice without losing sight of the most basic philosophical arguments about just social life. It is the search for a solution that better fits the social reality in face of the apparent failure of the current mechanisms of election in contemporary democratic societies. For this, it is necessary to carefully evaluate the conditions of rationality, considering the system of requirements established in Social Choice Theory, searching for a viable answer that translates a true social choice and not just a sum of individual choices. In the meantime, it is necessary to evaluate the possibility of cooperation, given the individual concessions that must take place in a model of social choice. In the search for the translation of the individual will in intersubjective terms, to analyze and understand the reason that lead the individual to cooperate, becomes a fundamental question. A theory of the evolution of cooperation, helps us to understand what leads the individual to give up the purely selfish position without losing sight of the inherent rationality of individual choice. The solution that is presented is a two step procedure. The first step is to establish a cooperative equilibrium. The second is the maintenance and rebalancing of the established cooperation. For the second part of the procedure the model chosen is the discursive model of reciprocal justification as an alternative to print autonomous, cooperative and nonauthoritarian decisions. In this model there must be always open space for deliberation and a justified rationality that guarantees autonomy, not arbitrariness and that serves, analogously, as a main strategy to curb noncooperative action. Justification, in these terms, is considered not only as a right (Recht auf Rechtfertigung), but as a reciprocal duty, aiming to fill the information deficit in decision making. The approach of justified and reciprocal choice proposed here functions as a central planner who, with the statements of the agents themselves, is able to better evaluate the rationality that informs the social decision and may even foresee and detect any errors and anomalies, both in the selection process as in the results of the choice.A presente tese ? uma proposi??o otimista de um modelo de escolha social que seja capaz de manter a pot?ncia formal da an?lise l?gica dos mecanismos de escolha sem perder de vista os argumentos filos?ficos mais b?sicos sobre a vida social justa. Trata-se da busca por uma solu??o que melhor se adeque a realidade social em face da fal?ncia aparente dos atuais mecanismos de elei??o nas sociedades democr?ticas contempor?neas. Para isso ? necess?rio que se avalie atentamente as condi??es de racionalidade estabelecidas, considerando os requisitos formais de desempenho l?gico, tais quais historicamente desenvolvidos na teoria da escolha coletiva, tendo em vista uma resposta vi?vel que n?o apenas represente um somat?rio de escolhas individuais, mas traduza uma verdadeira escolha social. Nesse ?nterim, ? necess?ria a avalia??o da possibilidade de coopera??o, haja vista as concess?es individuais que devem tomar lugar num modelo de escolha social. Na busca da tradu??o da vontade individual em termos intersubjetivos, analisar e entender os motivos que levam o indiv?duo a cooperar, passa a ser quest?o fundamental. Uma teoria da evolu??o da coopera??o ajuda-nos a compreender o que leva o indiv?duo a abrir m?o da posi??o puramente ego?sta sem perder de vista a racionalidade inerente a escolha individual. A solu??o que se apresenta ? um procedimento em duas etapas. A primeira fase consiste no estabelecimento do equil?brio cooperativo. A segunda, na manuten??o e reequil?brio da coopera??o estabelecida. Para a segunda parte do procedimento foi escolhido o modelo discursivo de justifica??o rec?proca como alternativa para imprimir decis?es aut?nomas, cooperativas e n?o autorit?rias. Nesse modelo deve haver espa?o sempre aberto para a delibera??o e uma racionalidade justificada que garanta a autonomia, a n?o arbitrariedade e que sirva, analogamente, como estrat?gia majorit?ria para coibir a atua??o n?ocooperativa. A justifica??o, nestes termos, passa a ser considerada n?o s? como direito (Recht auf Rechtfertigung), mas como dever rec?proco, visando suprir o d?ficit informacional na tomada de decis?o. A abordagem da escolha justificada e rec?proca aqui proposta passa a funcionar como um planejador central que, munido das declara??es dos pr?prios agentes, ? capaz de avaliar melhor a racionalidade que informa a decis?o social podendo, inclusive, prever e detectar eventuais erros e anomalias, tanto no processo de sele??o como nos resultados da escolha.Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2019-06-03T16:25:24Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CARLOS ROBERTO BUENO FERREIRA - Tese - 23-05-2019.pdf: 2634301 bytes, checksum: 142ecc7f3fd79846a66d4028c4baa521 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sarajane Pan (sarajane.pan@pucrs.br) on 2019-06-14T18:53:45Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 CARLOS ROBERTO BUENO FERREIRA - Tese - 23-05-2019.pdf: 2634301 bytes, checksum: 142ecc7f3fd79846a66d4028c4baa521 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-06-14T19:11:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CARLOS ROBERTO BUENO FERREIRA - Tese - 23-05-2019.pdf: 2634301 bytes, checksum: 142ecc7f3fd79846a66d4028c4baa521 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-03-25Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/175576/CARLOS%20ROBERTO%20BUENO%20FERREIRA%20-%20Tese%20-%2023-05-2019.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em FilosofiaPUCRSBrasilEscola de HumanidadesEscolha SocialCoopera??oJustifica??oCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAPara al?m da escolha individual : um modelo de escolha social justificadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisTrabalho n?o apresenta restri??o para publica??o-1441514414422910841500500500600-6557531471218110192-6723520209401670533590462550136975366info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILCARLOS ROBERTO BUENO FERREIRA - Tese - 23-05-2019.pdf.jpgCARLOS ROBERTO BUENO FERREIRA - Tese - 23-05-2019.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5556http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8717/4/CARLOS+ROBERTO+BUENO+FERREIRA+-+Tese+-+23-05-2019.pdf.jpg25b505347bf685b75c146225b6c9c8deMD54TEXTCARLOS ROBERTO BUENO FERREIRA - Tese - 23-05-2019.pdf.txtCARLOS ROBERTO BUENO FERREIRA - Tese - 23-05-2019.pdf.txttext/plain235444http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8717/3/CARLOS+ROBERTO+BUENO+FERREIRA+-+Tese+-+23-05-2019.pdf.txt04a162cd3f20ba16e5968db9d6f67ecfMD53ORIGINALCARLOS ROBERTO BUENO FERREIRA - Tese - 23-05-2019.pdfCARLOS ROBERTO BUENO FERREIRA - Tese - 23-05-2019.pdfapplication/pdf2634301http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8717/2/CARLOS+ROBERTO+BUENO+FERREIRA+-+Tese+-+23-05-2019.pdf142ecc7f3fd79846a66d4028c4baa521MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8590http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8717/1/license.txt220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24MD51tede/87172019-06-14 20:00:42.195oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2019-06-14T23:00:42Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Para al?m da escolha individual : um modelo de escolha social justificada |
title |
Para al?m da escolha individual : um modelo de escolha social justificada |
spellingShingle |
Para al?m da escolha individual : um modelo de escolha social justificada Ferreira, Carlos Roberto Bueno Escolha Social Coopera??o Justifica??o CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Para al?m da escolha individual : um modelo de escolha social justificada |
title_full |
Para al?m da escolha individual : um modelo de escolha social justificada |
title_fullStr |
Para al?m da escolha individual : um modelo de escolha social justificada |
title_full_unstemmed |
Para al?m da escolha individual : um modelo de escolha social justificada |
title_sort |
Para al?m da escolha individual : um modelo de escolha social justificada |
author |
Ferreira, Carlos Roberto Bueno |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Carlos Roberto Bueno |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Nythamar Hil?rio de |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3541527557611037 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2141247409019428 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Carlos Roberto Bueno |
contributor_str_mv |
Oliveira, Nythamar Hil?rio de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Escolha Social Coopera??o Justifica??o |
topic |
Escolha Social Coopera??o Justifica??o CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The present thesis is an optimistic proposition of a social choice model that is able to maintain the formal power of logical analysis present on the mechanisms of choice without losing sight of the most basic philosophical arguments about just social life. It is the search for a solution that better fits the social reality in face of the apparent failure of the current mechanisms of election in contemporary democratic societies. For this, it is necessary to carefully evaluate the conditions of rationality, considering the system of requirements established in Social Choice Theory, searching for a viable answer that translates a true social choice and not just a sum of individual choices. In the meantime, it is necessary to evaluate the possibility of cooperation, given the individual concessions that must take place in a model of social choice. In the search for the translation of the individual will in intersubjective terms, to analyze and understand the reason that lead the individual to cooperate, becomes a fundamental question. A theory of the evolution of cooperation, helps us to understand what leads the individual to give up the purely selfish position without losing sight of the inherent rationality of individual choice. The solution that is presented is a two step procedure. The first step is to establish a cooperative equilibrium. The second is the maintenance and rebalancing of the established cooperation. For the second part of the procedure the model chosen is the discursive model of reciprocal justification as an alternative to print autonomous, cooperative and nonauthoritarian decisions. In this model there must be always open space for deliberation and a justified rationality that guarantees autonomy, not arbitrariness and that serves, analogously, as a main strategy to curb noncooperative action. Justification, in these terms, is considered not only as a right (Recht auf Rechtfertigung), but as a reciprocal duty, aiming to fill the information deficit in decision making. The approach of justified and reciprocal choice proposed here functions as a central planner who, with the statements of the agents themselves, is able to better evaluate the rationality that informs the social decision and may even foresee and detect any errors and anomalies, both in the selection process as in the results of the choice. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-14T19:11:05Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-25 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8717 |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8717 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-1441514414422910841 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6557531471218110192 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-672352020940167053 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
3590462550136975366 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidades |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8717/4/CARLOS+ROBERTO+BUENO+FERREIRA+-+Tese+-+23-05-2019.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8717/3/CARLOS+ROBERTO+BUENO+FERREIRA+-+Tese+-+23-05-2019.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8717/2/CARLOS+ROBERTO+BUENO+FERREIRA+-+Tese+-+23-05-2019.pdf http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8717/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
25b505347bf685b75c146225b6c9c8de 04a162cd3f20ba16e5968db9d6f67ecf 142ecc7f3fd79846a66d4028c4baa521 220e11f2d3ba5354f917c7035aadef24 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1796793119071535104 |