Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Christino, Juliana Maria Magalhães
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Cardozo, Erico Aurelio Abreu, Silva, Bernardo Garretto Cerqueira, Silva, Thais Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/14616
Resumo: Objective: This study aimed to analyze the reasons that lead consumers to reject the tool for collecting and using navigation data called remarketing.Method: This article presented a pluralistic approach through an exploratory and conclusive descriptive stage, based on three theoretical models of rejection to advertising, men and women answered questions related to their perception about the use of navigation data and remarketing.Originality: For the first time, the synthesis of the models developed by Cho; Cheon (2004), Kelly; Kerr; Drennan (2010) and Yaakop (2013) was empirically tested to analyze the possibility of consumer rejection of a relatively new type of advertising, remarketing.Results: The results showed great explanatory power - 85%, with the constructs Disorder, Relevance, Invasion and Credibility being the main predictors of rejection behavior.Contributions: Due to the lack of empirical work on the subject in the Brazilian context, and the increasing possibilities of using navigation data, this study deepens the existing knowledge and provides empirical support for subsequent studies.
id RBM-1_dc354c4aa94aaeb64016b1cec472f59b
oai_identifier_str oai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/14616
network_acronym_str RBM-1
network_name_str REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejectionAnálises dos motivos da rejeição da ferramenta RemarketingBehavior segmentation; Remarketing; Advertising evasion.Segmentação comportamental; Remarketing; Evasão de publicidade; Dados de navegação;Objective: This study aimed to analyze the reasons that lead consumers to reject the tool for collecting and using navigation data called remarketing.Method: This article presented a pluralistic approach through an exploratory and conclusive descriptive stage, based on three theoretical models of rejection to advertising, men and women answered questions related to their perception about the use of navigation data and remarketing.Originality: For the first time, the synthesis of the models developed by Cho; Cheon (2004), Kelly; Kerr; Drennan (2010) and Yaakop (2013) was empirically tested to analyze the possibility of consumer rejection of a relatively new type of advertising, remarketing.Results: The results showed great explanatory power - 85%, with the constructs Disorder, Relevance, Invasion and Credibility being the main predictors of rejection behavior.Contributions: Due to the lack of empirical work on the subject in the Brazilian context, and the increasing possibilities of using navigation data, this study deepens the existing knowledge and provides empirical support for subsequent studies.Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar os motivos que suscitam a rejeição dos consumidores à ferramenta de coleta e uso de dados de navegação denominada remarketing.Método: Este artigo apresentou uma abordagem pluralística por meio de etapa exploratória e etapa conclusivo descritiva, baseada em três modelos teóricos de rejeição a publicidade. Homens e mulheres responderam a perguntas relacionadas a sua percepção sobre o uso de dados de navegação e o remarketing.Originalidade: Pela primeira vez, foi testado empiricamente a síntese dos modelos desenvolvidos por  Cho; Cheon (2004), Kelly; Kerr; Drennan (2010) e Yaakop (2013) para analisar a possibilidade de rejeição dos consumidores com relação a um tipo relativamente novo de propaganda, o remarketing.Resultados: Os resultados apontaram um grande poder explicativo - 85%, sendo os constructos Desordem, Relevância, Invasão e Credibilidade os principais preditores do comportamento de rejeição.Contribuições: Devido a carência de trabalhos empíricos que versem sobre o assunto no contexto brasileiro, e as crescentes possibilidades de utilização de dados de navegação o presente estudo aprofunda os conhecimentos existente e dá suporte empírico para estudos subsequentes.Universidade Nove de Julho - UninoveO presente trabalho foi realizado com apoio do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - (CNPq)Christino, Juliana Maria MagalhãesCardozo, Erico Aurelio AbreuSilva, Bernardo Garretto CerqueiraSilva, Thais Santos2020-09-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/1461610.5585/remark.v19i3.14616ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing; v. 19, n. 3 (2020): (jul./set.); 642-6672177-5184reponame:REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketinginstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:RBMenghttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/14616/8474Direitos autorais 2020 Revista Brasileira de Marketinghttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-01-18T18:08:20Zoai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/14616Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remarkPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/oaiclaudiaraac@uol.com.br || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org2177-51842177-5184opendoar:2022-01-18T18:08:20REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection
Análises dos motivos da rejeição da ferramenta Remarketing
title Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection
spellingShingle Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection
Christino, Juliana Maria Magalhães
Behavior segmentation; Remarketing; Advertising evasion.
Segmentação comportamental; Remarketing; Evasão de publicidade; Dados de navegação;
title_short Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection
title_full Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection
title_fullStr Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection
title_sort Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection
author Christino, Juliana Maria Magalhães
author_facet Christino, Juliana Maria Magalhães
Cardozo, Erico Aurelio Abreu
Silva, Bernardo Garretto Cerqueira
Silva, Thais Santos
author_role author
author2 Cardozo, Erico Aurelio Abreu
Silva, Bernardo Garretto Cerqueira
Silva, Thais Santos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
O presente trabalho foi realizado com apoio do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - (CNPq)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Christino, Juliana Maria Magalhães
Cardozo, Erico Aurelio Abreu
Silva, Bernardo Garretto Cerqueira
Silva, Thais Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Behavior segmentation; Remarketing; Advertising evasion.
Segmentação comportamental; Remarketing; Evasão de publicidade; Dados de navegação;
topic Behavior segmentation; Remarketing; Advertising evasion.
Segmentação comportamental; Remarketing; Evasão de publicidade; Dados de navegação;
description Objective: This study aimed to analyze the reasons that lead consumers to reject the tool for collecting and using navigation data called remarketing.Method: This article presented a pluralistic approach through an exploratory and conclusive descriptive stage, based on three theoretical models of rejection to advertising, men and women answered questions related to their perception about the use of navigation data and remarketing.Originality: For the first time, the synthesis of the models developed by Cho; Cheon (2004), Kelly; Kerr; Drennan (2010) and Yaakop (2013) was empirically tested to analyze the possibility of consumer rejection of a relatively new type of advertising, remarketing.Results: The results showed great explanatory power - 85%, with the constructs Disorder, Relevance, Invasion and Credibility being the main predictors of rejection behavior.Contributions: Due to the lack of empirical work on the subject in the Brazilian context, and the increasing possibilities of using navigation data, this study deepens the existing knowledge and provides empirical support for subsequent studies.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/14616
10.5585/remark.v19i3.14616
url https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/14616
identifier_str_mv 10.5585/remark.v19i3.14616
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/14616/8474
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Revista Brasileira de Marketing
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Revista Brasileira de Marketing
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing; v. 19, n. 3 (2020): (jul./set.); 642-667
2177-5184
reponame:REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:RBM
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str RBM
institution RBM
reponame_str REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing
collection REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing
repository.name.fl_str_mv REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv claudiaraac@uol.com.br || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org
_version_ 1799138640351199232