Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/14616 |
Resumo: | Objective: This study aimed to analyze the reasons that lead consumers to reject the tool for collecting and using navigation data called remarketing.Method: This article presented a pluralistic approach through an exploratory and conclusive descriptive stage, based on three theoretical models of rejection to advertising, men and women answered questions related to their perception about the use of navigation data and remarketing.Originality: For the first time, the synthesis of the models developed by Cho; Cheon (2004), Kelly; Kerr; Drennan (2010) and Yaakop (2013) was empirically tested to analyze the possibility of consumer rejection of a relatively new type of advertising, remarketing.Results: The results showed great explanatory power - 85%, with the constructs Disorder, Relevance, Invasion and Credibility being the main predictors of rejection behavior.Contributions: Due to the lack of empirical work on the subject in the Brazilian context, and the increasing possibilities of using navigation data, this study deepens the existing knowledge and provides empirical support for subsequent studies. |
id |
RBM-1_dc354c4aa94aaeb64016b1cec472f59b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/14616 |
network_acronym_str |
RBM-1 |
network_name_str |
REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejectionAnálises dos motivos da rejeição da ferramenta RemarketingBehavior segmentation; Remarketing; Advertising evasion.Segmentação comportamental; Remarketing; Evasão de publicidade; Dados de navegação;Objective: This study aimed to analyze the reasons that lead consumers to reject the tool for collecting and using navigation data called remarketing.Method: This article presented a pluralistic approach through an exploratory and conclusive descriptive stage, based on three theoretical models of rejection to advertising, men and women answered questions related to their perception about the use of navigation data and remarketing.Originality: For the first time, the synthesis of the models developed by Cho; Cheon (2004), Kelly; Kerr; Drennan (2010) and Yaakop (2013) was empirically tested to analyze the possibility of consumer rejection of a relatively new type of advertising, remarketing.Results: The results showed great explanatory power - 85%, with the constructs Disorder, Relevance, Invasion and Credibility being the main predictors of rejection behavior.Contributions: Due to the lack of empirical work on the subject in the Brazilian context, and the increasing possibilities of using navigation data, this study deepens the existing knowledge and provides empirical support for subsequent studies.Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar os motivos que suscitam a rejeição dos consumidores à ferramenta de coleta e uso de dados de navegação denominada remarketing.Método: Este artigo apresentou uma abordagem pluralística por meio de etapa exploratória e etapa conclusivo descritiva, baseada em três modelos teóricos de rejeição a publicidade. Homens e mulheres responderam a perguntas relacionadas a sua percepção sobre o uso de dados de navegação e o remarketing.Originalidade: Pela primeira vez, foi testado empiricamente a síntese dos modelos desenvolvidos por Cho; Cheon (2004), Kelly; Kerr; Drennan (2010) e Yaakop (2013) para analisar a possibilidade de rejeição dos consumidores com relação a um tipo relativamente novo de propaganda, o remarketing.Resultados: Os resultados apontaram um grande poder explicativo - 85%, sendo os constructos Desordem, Relevância, Invasão e Credibilidade os principais preditores do comportamento de rejeição.Contribuições: Devido a carência de trabalhos empíricos que versem sobre o assunto no contexto brasileiro, e as crescentes possibilidades de utilização de dados de navegação o presente estudo aprofunda os conhecimentos existente e dá suporte empírico para estudos subsequentes.Universidade Nove de Julho - UninoveO presente trabalho foi realizado com apoio do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - (CNPq)Christino, Juliana Maria MagalhãesCardozo, Erico Aurelio AbreuSilva, Bernardo Garretto CerqueiraSilva, Thais Santos2020-09-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/1461610.5585/remark.v19i3.14616ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing; v. 19, n. 3 (2020): (jul./set.); 642-6672177-5184reponame:REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketinginstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:RBMenghttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/14616/8474Direitos autorais 2020 Revista Brasileira de Marketinghttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-01-18T18:08:20Zoai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/14616Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remarkPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/oaiclaudiaraac@uol.com.br || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org2177-51842177-5184opendoar:2022-01-18T18:08:20REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection Análises dos motivos da rejeição da ferramenta Remarketing |
title |
Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection Christino, Juliana Maria Magalhães Behavior segmentation; Remarketing; Advertising evasion. Segmentação comportamental; Remarketing; Evasão de publicidade; Dados de navegação; |
title_short |
Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection |
title_full |
Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection |
title_sort |
Analysis of reasons for Remarketing tool rejection |
author |
Christino, Juliana Maria Magalhães |
author_facet |
Christino, Juliana Maria Magalhães Cardozo, Erico Aurelio Abreu Silva, Bernardo Garretto Cerqueira Silva, Thais Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cardozo, Erico Aurelio Abreu Silva, Bernardo Garretto Cerqueira Silva, Thais Santos |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
O presente trabalho foi realizado com apoio do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - (CNPq) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Christino, Juliana Maria Magalhães Cardozo, Erico Aurelio Abreu Silva, Bernardo Garretto Cerqueira Silva, Thais Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Behavior segmentation; Remarketing; Advertising evasion. Segmentação comportamental; Remarketing; Evasão de publicidade; Dados de navegação; |
topic |
Behavior segmentation; Remarketing; Advertising evasion. Segmentação comportamental; Remarketing; Evasão de publicidade; Dados de navegação; |
description |
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the reasons that lead consumers to reject the tool for collecting and using navigation data called remarketing.Method: This article presented a pluralistic approach through an exploratory and conclusive descriptive stage, based on three theoretical models of rejection to advertising, men and women answered questions related to their perception about the use of navigation data and remarketing.Originality: For the first time, the synthesis of the models developed by Cho; Cheon (2004), Kelly; Kerr; Drennan (2010) and Yaakop (2013) was empirically tested to analyze the possibility of consumer rejection of a relatively new type of advertising, remarketing.Results: The results showed great explanatory power - 85%, with the constructs Disorder, Relevance, Invasion and Credibility being the main predictors of rejection behavior.Contributions: Due to the lack of empirical work on the subject in the Brazilian context, and the increasing possibilities of using navigation data, this study deepens the existing knowledge and provides empirical support for subsequent studies. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/14616 10.5585/remark.v19i3.14616 |
url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/14616 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/remark.v19i3.14616 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/remark/article/view/14616/8474 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Revista Brasileira de Marketing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Revista Brasileira de Marketing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing; v. 19, n. 3 (2020): (jul./set.); 642-667 2177-5184 reponame:REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:RBM |
instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
instacron_str |
RBM |
institution |
RBM |
reponame_str |
REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing |
collection |
REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
REMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
claudiaraac@uol.com.br || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org || admin@revistabrasileiramarketing.org |
_version_ |
1799138640351199232 |