Clinical performance of a new hybrid contact lens for keratoconus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carracedo, Gonzalo
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: González-Méijome, José Manuel, Ferreira, Daniela Lopes, Batres, Laura
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/31264
Resumo: Objectives: To compare the clinical performance of the Clearkone hybrid contact lens for the treatment of keratoconus against the habitual contact lens of the patients. Methods: A total of 33 eyes from 18 patients were fitted with the Clearkone. High- and low-contrast visual acuity (HCVA and LCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and contrast sensitivity acuity (CSF) were recorded with habitual lenses (prestudy visit) and after 1 week, 15 days, and 1 month of wear of prescribed Clearkone. Subjective vision and comfort were rated using visual analogue scales (VAS). Results: Three patients discontinued the study, one because of diffuse corneal staining after 1 day of use and the other two because of extreme discomfort. The rest of the patients completed the 1-month study. High contrast visual acuity and LCVA (logMAR) improved significantly from 0.16 6 0.12 and 0.44 6 0.22, respectively, with the patient’s habitual contact lenses to 20.006 6 0.058 and 0.23 6 0.13 after 1 day wearing Clearkone, remaining significant during all follow-up visits (P,0.001; repeated measures analysis of variance [RM-ANOVA]). There were no statistically significant differences in the mean CCT. The improvement of CSF was statistically significant with hybrid contact lenses prescribed compared with the patient’s habitual contact lenses (P,0.001; RM-ANOVA test). Improvement in VAS score, with prescribed Clearkone, was statistically significant for comfort (P=0.043; RM-ANOVA test), but not for the subjective vision (P=0.759; RM-ANOVA test). Conclusions: Clearkone provides an improvement in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and subjective comfort in patients with keratoconus when compared with other contact lens options. However, clinicians must get specific training to fit the lens and be aware of potential adverse events
id RCAP_09cfd841876bfd2e8ece9ee4f1eb3f72
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/31264
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical performance of a new hybrid contact lens for keratoconusHybrid lensComfortVisual outcomesKeratoconusScience & TechnologyObjectives: To compare the clinical performance of the Clearkone hybrid contact lens for the treatment of keratoconus against the habitual contact lens of the patients. Methods: A total of 33 eyes from 18 patients were fitted with the Clearkone. High- and low-contrast visual acuity (HCVA and LCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and contrast sensitivity acuity (CSF) were recorded with habitual lenses (prestudy visit) and after 1 week, 15 days, and 1 month of wear of prescribed Clearkone. Subjective vision and comfort were rated using visual analogue scales (VAS). Results: Three patients discontinued the study, one because of diffuse corneal staining after 1 day of use and the other two because of extreme discomfort. The rest of the patients completed the 1-month study. High contrast visual acuity and LCVA (logMAR) improved significantly from 0.16 6 0.12 and 0.44 6 0.22, respectively, with the patient’s habitual contact lenses to 20.006 6 0.058 and 0.23 6 0.13 after 1 day wearing Clearkone, remaining significant during all follow-up visits (P,0.001; repeated measures analysis of variance [RM-ANOVA]). There were no statistically significant differences in the mean CCT. The improvement of CSF was statistically significant with hybrid contact lenses prescribed compared with the patient’s habitual contact lenses (P,0.001; RM-ANOVA test). Improvement in VAS score, with prescribed Clearkone, was statistically significant for comfort (P=0.043; RM-ANOVA test), but not for the subjective vision (P=0.759; RM-ANOVA test). Conclusions: Clearkone provides an improvement in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and subjective comfort in patients with keratoconus when compared with other contact lens options. However, clinicians must get specific training to fit the lens and be aware of potential adverse eventsContact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO)Universidade do MinhoCarracedo, GonzaloGonzález-Méijome, José ManuelFerreira, Daniela LopesBatres, Laura20142014-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/31264eng1542-233X10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182a70ff224296956info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:44:26ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical performance of a new hybrid contact lens for keratoconus
title Clinical performance of a new hybrid contact lens for keratoconus
spellingShingle Clinical performance of a new hybrid contact lens for keratoconus
Carracedo, Gonzalo
Hybrid lens
Comfort
Visual outcomes
Keratoconus
Science & Technology
title_short Clinical performance of a new hybrid contact lens for keratoconus
title_full Clinical performance of a new hybrid contact lens for keratoconus
title_fullStr Clinical performance of a new hybrid contact lens for keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Clinical performance of a new hybrid contact lens for keratoconus
title_sort Clinical performance of a new hybrid contact lens for keratoconus
author Carracedo, Gonzalo
author_facet Carracedo, Gonzalo
González-Méijome, José Manuel
Ferreira, Daniela Lopes
Batres, Laura
author_role author
author2 González-Méijome, José Manuel
Ferreira, Daniela Lopes
Batres, Laura
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carracedo, Gonzalo
González-Méijome, José Manuel
Ferreira, Daniela Lopes
Batres, Laura
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hybrid lens
Comfort
Visual outcomes
Keratoconus
Science & Technology
topic Hybrid lens
Comfort
Visual outcomes
Keratoconus
Science & Technology
description Objectives: To compare the clinical performance of the Clearkone hybrid contact lens for the treatment of keratoconus against the habitual contact lens of the patients. Methods: A total of 33 eyes from 18 patients were fitted with the Clearkone. High- and low-contrast visual acuity (HCVA and LCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and contrast sensitivity acuity (CSF) were recorded with habitual lenses (prestudy visit) and after 1 week, 15 days, and 1 month of wear of prescribed Clearkone. Subjective vision and comfort were rated using visual analogue scales (VAS). Results: Three patients discontinued the study, one because of diffuse corneal staining after 1 day of use and the other two because of extreme discomfort. The rest of the patients completed the 1-month study. High contrast visual acuity and LCVA (logMAR) improved significantly from 0.16 6 0.12 and 0.44 6 0.22, respectively, with the patient’s habitual contact lenses to 20.006 6 0.058 and 0.23 6 0.13 after 1 day wearing Clearkone, remaining significant during all follow-up visits (P,0.001; repeated measures analysis of variance [RM-ANOVA]). There were no statistically significant differences in the mean CCT. The improvement of CSF was statistically significant with hybrid contact lenses prescribed compared with the patient’s habitual contact lenses (P,0.001; RM-ANOVA test). Improvement in VAS score, with prescribed Clearkone, was statistically significant for comfort (P=0.043; RM-ANOVA test), but not for the subjective vision (P=0.759; RM-ANOVA test). Conclusions: Clearkone provides an improvement in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and subjective comfort in patients with keratoconus when compared with other contact lens options. However, clinicians must get specific training to fit the lens and be aware of potential adverse events
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/31264
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/31264
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1542-233X
10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182a70ff2
24296956
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777303832018026496