A comparative study of linear regression methods in noisy environments

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reis, Marco S.
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Saraiva, Pedro M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/8187
https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.897
Resumo: With the development of measurement instrumentation methods and metrology, one is very often able to rigorously specify the uncertainty associated with each measured value (e.g. concentrations, spectra, process sensors). The use of this information, along with the corresponding raw measurements, should, in principle, lead to more sound ways of performing data analysis, since the quality of data can be explicitly taken into account. This should be true, in particular, when noise is heteroscedastic and of a large magnitude. In this paper we focus on alternative multivariate linear regression methods conceived to take into account data uncertainties. We critically investigate their prediction and parameter estimation capabilities and suggest some modifications of well-established approaches. All alternatives are tested under simulation scenarios that cover different noise and data structures. The results thus obtained provide guidelines on which methods to use and when. Interestingly enough, some of the methods that explicitly incorporate uncertainty information in their formulations tend to present not as good performances in the examples studied, whereas others that do not do so present an overall good performance. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
id RCAP_102ae37a37faf9284ab9c8329c98d6b8
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/8187
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A comparative study of linear regression methods in noisy environmentsWith the development of measurement instrumentation methods and metrology, one is very often able to rigorously specify the uncertainty associated with each measured value (e.g. concentrations, spectra, process sensors). The use of this information, along with the corresponding raw measurements, should, in principle, lead to more sound ways of performing data analysis, since the quality of data can be explicitly taken into account. This should be true, in particular, when noise is heteroscedastic and of a large magnitude. In this paper we focus on alternative multivariate linear regression methods conceived to take into account data uncertainties. We critically investigate their prediction and parameter estimation capabilities and suggest some modifications of well-established approaches. All alternatives are tested under simulation scenarios that cover different noise and data structures. The results thus obtained provide guidelines on which methods to use and when. Interestingly enough, some of the methods that explicitly incorporate uncertainty information in their formulations tend to present not as good performances in the examples studied, whereas others that do not do so present an overall good performance. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.2004info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/8187http://hdl.handle.net/10316/8187https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.897engJournal of Chemometrics. 18:12 (2004) 526-536Reis, Marco S.Saraiva, Pedro M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2020-05-29T09:42:37Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/8187Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:59:17.620679Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparative study of linear regression methods in noisy environments
title A comparative study of linear regression methods in noisy environments
spellingShingle A comparative study of linear regression methods in noisy environments
Reis, Marco S.
title_short A comparative study of linear regression methods in noisy environments
title_full A comparative study of linear regression methods in noisy environments
title_fullStr A comparative study of linear regression methods in noisy environments
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of linear regression methods in noisy environments
title_sort A comparative study of linear regression methods in noisy environments
author Reis, Marco S.
author_facet Reis, Marco S.
Saraiva, Pedro M.
author_role author
author2 Saraiva, Pedro M.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reis, Marco S.
Saraiva, Pedro M.
description With the development of measurement instrumentation methods and metrology, one is very often able to rigorously specify the uncertainty associated with each measured value (e.g. concentrations, spectra, process sensors). The use of this information, along with the corresponding raw measurements, should, in principle, lead to more sound ways of performing data analysis, since the quality of data can be explicitly taken into account. This should be true, in particular, when noise is heteroscedastic and of a large magnitude. In this paper we focus on alternative multivariate linear regression methods conceived to take into account data uncertainties. We critically investigate their prediction and parameter estimation capabilities and suggest some modifications of well-established approaches. All alternatives are tested under simulation scenarios that cover different noise and data structures. The results thus obtained provide guidelines on which methods to use and when. Interestingly enough, some of the methods that explicitly incorporate uncertainty information in their formulations tend to present not as good performances in the examples studied, whereas others that do not do so present an overall good performance. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/8187
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/8187
https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.897
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/8187
https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.897
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Chemometrics. 18:12 (2004) 526-536
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133884124758016