Pilot process research of reflecting conversations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1995 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9346 |
Resumo: | A psychotherapy process methodology, Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR), was used on a pilot sample of couples to better understand what transpires during Reflecting Team dialogues. Using data collected in an earlier ethnography, a team of researchers performed a constant comparative analysis of transcripts of the dialogues immediately before, during and after Reflecting Team clinical markers (Rice & Greenberg, 1984, 1992). Not surprisingly, the couples' experiences of Reflecting Team differed from therapists' in all three phases of the dialogues. For the period immediately preceding the Reflecting Team dialogues, couples focused on process while therapists focused on expectations. During the dialogues, couples focused on the impact while therapists focused on its purpose. Finally, immediately after the dialogues, couples focused on the value of Reflecting Teams while therapists focused on its impact. Recommendations for future studies are given. |
id |
RCAP_185ee6029cb955d7797c9a112fb3c965 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/9346 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pilot process research of reflecting conversationsTherapeutic processConversationFamily psychotherapyMarital psychotherapyA psychotherapy process methodology, Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR), was used on a pilot sample of couples to better understand what transpires during Reflecting Team dialogues. Using data collected in an earlier ethnography, a team of researchers performed a constant comparative analysis of transcripts of the dialogues immediately before, during and after Reflecting Team clinical markers (Rice & Greenberg, 1984, 1992). Not surprisingly, the couples' experiences of Reflecting Team differed from therapists' in all three phases of the dialogues. For the period immediately preceding the Reflecting Team dialogues, couples focused on process while therapists focused on expectations. During the dialogues, couples focused on the impact while therapists focused on its purpose. Finally, immediately after the dialogues, couples focused on the value of Reflecting Teams while therapists focused on its impact. Recommendations for future studies are given.Universidade do MinhoSmith, Thomas EdwardSells, Scott P.Pereira, M. GraçaTodahl, JeffreyPapagiannis, George19951995-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/9346eng"Journal of Family Psychotherapy". ISSN 0897-5353. 6:3 (1995) 71-89.0897-5353info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:31:46ZPortal AgregadorONG |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pilot process research of reflecting conversations |
title |
Pilot process research of reflecting conversations |
spellingShingle |
Pilot process research of reflecting conversations Smith, Thomas Edward Therapeutic process Conversation Family psychotherapy Marital psychotherapy |
title_short |
Pilot process research of reflecting conversations |
title_full |
Pilot process research of reflecting conversations |
title_fullStr |
Pilot process research of reflecting conversations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pilot process research of reflecting conversations |
title_sort |
Pilot process research of reflecting conversations |
author |
Smith, Thomas Edward |
author_facet |
Smith, Thomas Edward Sells, Scott P. Pereira, M. Graça Todahl, Jeffrey Papagiannis, George |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sells, Scott P. Pereira, M. Graça Todahl, Jeffrey Papagiannis, George |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Smith, Thomas Edward Sells, Scott P. Pereira, M. Graça Todahl, Jeffrey Papagiannis, George |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Therapeutic process Conversation Family psychotherapy Marital psychotherapy |
topic |
Therapeutic process Conversation Family psychotherapy Marital psychotherapy |
description |
A psychotherapy process methodology, Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR), was used on a pilot sample of couples to better understand what transpires during Reflecting Team dialogues. Using data collected in an earlier ethnography, a team of researchers performed a constant comparative analysis of transcripts of the dialogues immediately before, during and after Reflecting Team clinical markers (Rice & Greenberg, 1984, 1992). Not surprisingly, the couples' experiences of Reflecting Team differed from therapists' in all three phases of the dialogues. For the period immediately preceding the Reflecting Team dialogues, couples focused on process while therapists focused on expectations. During the dialogues, couples focused on the impact while therapists focused on its purpose. Finally, immediately after the dialogues, couples focused on the value of Reflecting Teams while therapists focused on its impact. Recommendations for future studies are given. |
publishDate |
1995 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1995 1995-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9346 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9346 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
"Journal of Family Psychotherapy". ISSN 0897-5353. 6:3 (1995) 71-89. 0897-5353 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1777303779338616832 |