Pilot process research of reflecting conversations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Smith, Thomas Edward
Data de Publicação: 1995
Outros Autores: Sells, Scott P., Pereira, M. Graça, Todahl, Jeffrey, Papagiannis, George
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9346
Resumo: A psychotherapy process methodology, Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR), was used on a pilot sample of couples to better understand what transpires during Reflecting Team dialogues. Using data collected in an earlier ethnography, a team of researchers performed a constant comparative analysis of transcripts of the dialogues immediately before, during and after Reflecting Team clinical markers (Rice & Greenberg, 1984, 1992). Not surprisingly, the couples' experiences of Reflecting Team differed from therapists' in all three phases of the dialogues. For the period immediately preceding the Reflecting Team dialogues, couples focused on process while therapists focused on expectations. During the dialogues, couples focused on the impact while therapists focused on its purpose. Finally, immediately after the dialogues, couples focused on the value of Reflecting Teams while therapists focused on its impact. Recommendations for future studies are given.
id RCAP_185ee6029cb955d7797c9a112fb3c965
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/9346
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Pilot process research of reflecting conversationsTherapeutic processConversationFamily psychotherapyMarital psychotherapyA psychotherapy process methodology, Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR), was used on a pilot sample of couples to better understand what transpires during Reflecting Team dialogues. Using data collected in an earlier ethnography, a team of researchers performed a constant comparative analysis of transcripts of the dialogues immediately before, during and after Reflecting Team clinical markers (Rice & Greenberg, 1984, 1992). Not surprisingly, the couples' experiences of Reflecting Team differed from therapists' in all three phases of the dialogues. For the period immediately preceding the Reflecting Team dialogues, couples focused on process while therapists focused on expectations. During the dialogues, couples focused on the impact while therapists focused on its purpose. Finally, immediately after the dialogues, couples focused on the value of Reflecting Teams while therapists focused on its impact. Recommendations for future studies are given.Universidade do MinhoSmith, Thomas EdwardSells, Scott P.Pereira, M. GraçaTodahl, JeffreyPapagiannis, George19951995-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/9346eng"Journal of Family Psychotherapy". ISSN 0897-5353. 6:3 (1995) 71-89.0897-5353info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:31:46ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pilot process research of reflecting conversations
title Pilot process research of reflecting conversations
spellingShingle Pilot process research of reflecting conversations
Smith, Thomas Edward
Therapeutic process
Conversation
Family psychotherapy
Marital psychotherapy
title_short Pilot process research of reflecting conversations
title_full Pilot process research of reflecting conversations
title_fullStr Pilot process research of reflecting conversations
title_full_unstemmed Pilot process research of reflecting conversations
title_sort Pilot process research of reflecting conversations
author Smith, Thomas Edward
author_facet Smith, Thomas Edward
Sells, Scott P.
Pereira, M. Graça
Todahl, Jeffrey
Papagiannis, George
author_role author
author2 Sells, Scott P.
Pereira, M. Graça
Todahl, Jeffrey
Papagiannis, George
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Smith, Thomas Edward
Sells, Scott P.
Pereira, M. Graça
Todahl, Jeffrey
Papagiannis, George
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Therapeutic process
Conversation
Family psychotherapy
Marital psychotherapy
topic Therapeutic process
Conversation
Family psychotherapy
Marital psychotherapy
description A psychotherapy process methodology, Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR), was used on a pilot sample of couples to better understand what transpires during Reflecting Team dialogues. Using data collected in an earlier ethnography, a team of researchers performed a constant comparative analysis of transcripts of the dialogues immediately before, during and after Reflecting Team clinical markers (Rice & Greenberg, 1984, 1992). Not surprisingly, the couples' experiences of Reflecting Team differed from therapists' in all three phases of the dialogues. For the period immediately preceding the Reflecting Team dialogues, couples focused on process while therapists focused on expectations. During the dialogues, couples focused on the impact while therapists focused on its purpose. Finally, immediately after the dialogues, couples focused on the value of Reflecting Teams while therapists focused on its impact. Recommendations for future studies are given.
publishDate 1995
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1995
1995-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9346
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/9346
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv "Journal of Family Psychotherapy". ISSN 0897-5353. 6:3 (1995) 71-89.
0897-5353
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777303779338616832