Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Romão, Vasco C.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Santos, Maria José, Polido-Pereira, Joaquim, Duarte, Cátia, Nero, Patrícia, Miguel, Cláudia, Costa, José António, Bernardes, Miguel, Pimentel-Santos, Fernando M., Barcelos, Filipe, Costa, Maria Lúcia, Melo Gomes, José António, Pereira Da Silva, José Alberto, Branco, Jaime, Canas da Silva, José, Pereira Da Silva, José António, Fonseca, João Eurico, Canhão, Helena, Shi, Guixiu
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/279890
Resumo: Objectives. To compare the effectiveness of TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, according to different response criteria. Methods. We included RA patients registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register treated with TNFi or tocilizumab for at least 6 months, between January 2008 and July 2013. We assessed remission/low disease activity (LDA) at 6 months according to DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI, as well as Boolean ACR/EULAR remission and EULAR response rate, adjusting for measured confounders. Results. Tocilizumab-treated patients (n = 95) presented higher baseline disease activity and were less frequently naïve to biologics compared to TNFi users (n = 429). Multivariate logistic regression analysis including the propensity score for receiving tocilizumab showed that patients treated with tocilizumab were more likely to achieve remission or LDA according to DAS28 (OR = 11.0/6.2, 95% CI 5.6-21.6/3.2-12.0), CDAI (OR = 2.8/2.6, 95% CI 1.2-6.5/1.3-5.5), or SDAI (OR = 3.6/2.5, 95% CI 1.5-8.7/1.1-5.5), as well as a good EULAR response (OR = 6.4, 95% CI 3.4-12.0). However, both groups did not differ in Boolean remission (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 0.8-4.8) or good/moderate EULAR response (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 0.8-4.5). Conclusions. Compared with TNFi, tocilizumab was associated with greater likelihood of achieving DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI remission/LDA and EULAR good response. Boolean remission and EULAR good/moderate response did not differ significantly between groups.
id RCAP_18606bf85c79b6ed6eb74da17504fbb7
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/21947
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patientsData from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register, Reuma.ptINTERLEUKIN-6 RECEPTOR INHIBITIONDRUG SURVIVALDOUBLE-BLINDADALIMUMABREMISSIONEFFICACYTRIALETANERCEPTINFLIXIMABSAFETYImmunology and Microbiology(all)Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)Objectives. To compare the effectiveness of TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, according to different response criteria. Methods. We included RA patients registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register treated with TNFi or tocilizumab for at least 6 months, between January 2008 and July 2013. We assessed remission/low disease activity (LDA) at 6 months according to DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI, as well as Boolean ACR/EULAR remission and EULAR response rate, adjusting for measured confounders. Results. Tocilizumab-treated patients (n = 95) presented higher baseline disease activity and were less frequently naïve to biologics compared to TNFi users (n = 429). Multivariate logistic regression analysis including the propensity score for receiving tocilizumab showed that patients treated with tocilizumab were more likely to achieve remission or LDA according to DAS28 (OR = 11.0/6.2, 95% CI 5.6-21.6/3.2-12.0), CDAI (OR = 2.8/2.6, 95% CI 1.2-6.5/1.3-5.5), or SDAI (OR = 3.6/2.5, 95% CI 1.5-8.7/1.1-5.5), as well as a good EULAR response (OR = 6.4, 95% CI 3.4-12.0). However, both groups did not differ in Boolean remission (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 0.8-4.8) or good/moderate EULAR response (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 0.8-4.5). Conclusions. Compared with TNFi, tocilizumab was associated with greater likelihood of achieving DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI remission/LDA and EULAR good response. Boolean remission and EULAR good/moderate response did not differ significantly between groups.NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas (CEDOC)RUNRomão, Vasco C.Santos, Maria JoséPolido-Pereira, JoaquimDuarte, CátiaNero, PatríciaMiguel, CláudiaCosta, José AntónioBernardes, MiguelPimentel-Santos, Fernando M.Barcelos, FilipeCosta, Maria LúciaMelo Gomes, José AntónioPereira Da Silva, José AlbertoBranco, JaimeCanas da Silva, JoséPereira Da Silva, José AntónioFonseca, João EuricoCanhão, HelenaShi, Guixiu2017-07-13T22:01:48Z20152015-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article13application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1155/2015/279890eng2314-6133PURE: 2928022http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929346565&partnerID=8YFLogxKhttps://doi.org/10.1155/2015/279890info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:09:07Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/21947Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:27:03.439396Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients
Data from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register, Reuma.pt
title Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients
spellingShingle Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients
Romão, Vasco C.
INTERLEUKIN-6 RECEPTOR INHIBITION
DRUG SURVIVAL
DOUBLE-BLIND
ADALIMUMAB
REMISSION
EFFICACY
TRIAL
ETANERCEPT
INFLIXIMAB
SAFETY
Immunology and Microbiology(all)
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
title_short Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_full Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients
title_sort Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients
author Romão, Vasco C.
author_facet Romão, Vasco C.
Santos, Maria José
Polido-Pereira, Joaquim
Duarte, Cátia
Nero, Patrícia
Miguel, Cláudia
Costa, José António
Bernardes, Miguel
Pimentel-Santos, Fernando M.
Barcelos, Filipe
Costa, Maria Lúcia
Melo Gomes, José António
Pereira Da Silva, José Alberto
Branco, Jaime
Canas da Silva, José
Pereira Da Silva, José António
Fonseca, João Eurico
Canhão, Helena
Shi, Guixiu
author_role author
author2 Santos, Maria José
Polido-Pereira, Joaquim
Duarte, Cátia
Nero, Patrícia
Miguel, Cláudia
Costa, José António
Bernardes, Miguel
Pimentel-Santos, Fernando M.
Barcelos, Filipe
Costa, Maria Lúcia
Melo Gomes, José António
Pereira Da Silva, José Alberto
Branco, Jaime
Canas da Silva, José
Pereira Da Silva, José António
Fonseca, João Eurico
Canhão, Helena
Shi, Guixiu
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)
Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas (CEDOC)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Romão, Vasco C.
Santos, Maria José
Polido-Pereira, Joaquim
Duarte, Cátia
Nero, Patrícia
Miguel, Cláudia
Costa, José António
Bernardes, Miguel
Pimentel-Santos, Fernando M.
Barcelos, Filipe
Costa, Maria Lúcia
Melo Gomes, José António
Pereira Da Silva, José Alberto
Branco, Jaime
Canas da Silva, José
Pereira Da Silva, José António
Fonseca, João Eurico
Canhão, Helena
Shi, Guixiu
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv INTERLEUKIN-6 RECEPTOR INHIBITION
DRUG SURVIVAL
DOUBLE-BLIND
ADALIMUMAB
REMISSION
EFFICACY
TRIAL
ETANERCEPT
INFLIXIMAB
SAFETY
Immunology and Microbiology(all)
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
topic INTERLEUKIN-6 RECEPTOR INHIBITION
DRUG SURVIVAL
DOUBLE-BLIND
ADALIMUMAB
REMISSION
EFFICACY
TRIAL
ETANERCEPT
INFLIXIMAB
SAFETY
Immunology and Microbiology(all)
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
description Objectives. To compare the effectiveness of TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, according to different response criteria. Methods. We included RA patients registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register treated with TNFi or tocilizumab for at least 6 months, between January 2008 and July 2013. We assessed remission/low disease activity (LDA) at 6 months according to DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI, as well as Boolean ACR/EULAR remission and EULAR response rate, adjusting for measured confounders. Results. Tocilizumab-treated patients (n = 95) presented higher baseline disease activity and were less frequently naïve to biologics compared to TNFi users (n = 429). Multivariate logistic regression analysis including the propensity score for receiving tocilizumab showed that patients treated with tocilizumab were more likely to achieve remission or LDA according to DAS28 (OR = 11.0/6.2, 95% CI 5.6-21.6/3.2-12.0), CDAI (OR = 2.8/2.6, 95% CI 1.2-6.5/1.3-5.5), or SDAI (OR = 3.6/2.5, 95% CI 1.5-8.7/1.1-5.5), as well as a good EULAR response (OR = 6.4, 95% CI 3.4-12.0). However, both groups did not differ in Boolean remission (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 0.8-4.8) or good/moderate EULAR response (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 0.8-4.5). Conclusions. Compared with TNFi, tocilizumab was associated with greater likelihood of achieving DAS28, CDAI, and SDAI remission/LDA and EULAR good response. Boolean remission and EULAR good/moderate response did not differ significantly between groups.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
2017-07-13T22:01:48Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/279890
url https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/279890
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2314-6133
PURE: 2928022
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929346565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/279890
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 13
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137899847876608