Cryptocurrency exchange landscape in the EU How regulation impacts success of cryptocurrency exchanges

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Szepesi, Laura
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/108486
Resumo: Ever since the emergence of digital assets, bitcoin (BTC) and other crype to currencies created huge debates and discussions globally. Demand has transformed trading opportunitis in the digital era, and anew ecosystem has been created around cryptocurrencies. Not only the coins, but the underlying technology has found many applications worldwide as well, especially in the financial markets.However, since the market infrastructure is growing expeditiously,regulations have a hard time keeping up with the speed of innovation. Merging this complex and fast evolving area into the established traditional legal framework has already proved to be a difficult and lengthy process. Due to the absence of a global harmony in the regulatory frameworks, digital service providers can take advantage of the regulatory arbitrage. In order to maximize profitability, the decision on how to cope with the regulatory framework can be crucial for any service provider.The attitude towards regulation in this environment is just as fragmented as the legislations itself. Founder and CEO of bit Flyer, Yuzo Kano made an announcement at the opening of the European office of bitFlyer:”When I set up bit Flyer in 2014, I did so with global ambitions and the belief that approved regulatory status is fundamental to the long-term future of Bitcoin and the virtual currency industry. I am proud that we are now the most compliant virtual currency exchange in the world; this coveted regulatory status gives our customers, our company and the virtual currency industry as a whole a verypositive future outlook[1].”A completely different approach was expressed by the CEO of Binance,Chang peng Zhao:“If you do fiat to crypto [. . . ] you have to have a bank account that can accept money,” he says. “That has its own advantages and problems. You have to deal with regulatory issues and usually you’retied to one country.”The more you deal with fiat, the more[authorities] can control you,” says Zhao. “The bank will freeze your bank account. They can make the wire transfer slow”[44].The strategical decisions of digital currency exchanges can be de-rived from their view on regulation. This paper will examine some of the top exchanges with a regional footprint in the European Union(EU). Furthermore, the impact of regulation on crypto exchanges will be analysed, based on the exchanges’ strategy and different success factors. The diversity of jurisdictions covered by this paper provides also an overview how various governments have approached regulat-ing digital exchanges. Even though the cryptocurrency market out-side of Europe should not be underestimated, this paper focuses on the comparative analysis on digital exchanges operating within the EU. Including other exchanges would alter the conclusion since the quoted crypto-fiat pairs, users, and many other factors diverge from the European landscape.The expectation is to conclude that regulatory compliant digital exchanges are more successful on a long-term perspective.
id RCAP_2319491d254daf7ce32632e3fb53f403
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/108486
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Cryptocurrency exchange landscape in the EU How regulation impacts success of cryptocurrency exchangesCryptocurrencyBlock chainBitcoinDigital exchangesPeer-to-PeerFinanceCrypto regulationDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoEver since the emergence of digital assets, bitcoin (BTC) and other crype to currencies created huge debates and discussions globally. Demand has transformed trading opportunitis in the digital era, and anew ecosystem has been created around cryptocurrencies. Not only the coins, but the underlying technology has found many applications worldwide as well, especially in the financial markets.However, since the market infrastructure is growing expeditiously,regulations have a hard time keeping up with the speed of innovation. Merging this complex and fast evolving area into the established traditional legal framework has already proved to be a difficult and lengthy process. Due to the absence of a global harmony in the regulatory frameworks, digital service providers can take advantage of the regulatory arbitrage. In order to maximize profitability, the decision on how to cope with the regulatory framework can be crucial for any service provider.The attitude towards regulation in this environment is just as fragmented as the legislations itself. Founder and CEO of bit Flyer, Yuzo Kano made an announcement at the opening of the European office of bitFlyer:”When I set up bit Flyer in 2014, I did so with global ambitions and the belief that approved regulatory status is fundamental to the long-term future of Bitcoin and the virtual currency industry. I am proud that we are now the most compliant virtual currency exchange in the world; this coveted regulatory status gives our customers, our company and the virtual currency industry as a whole a verypositive future outlook[1].”A completely different approach was expressed by the CEO of Binance,Chang peng Zhao:“If you do fiat to crypto [. . . ] you have to have a bank account that can accept money,” he says. “That has its own advantages and problems. You have to deal with regulatory issues and usually you’retied to one country.”The more you deal with fiat, the more[authorities] can control you,” says Zhao. “The bank will freeze your bank account. They can make the wire transfer slow”[44].The strategical decisions of digital currency exchanges can be de-rived from their view on regulation. This paper will examine some of the top exchanges with a regional footprint in the European Union(EU). Furthermore, the impact of regulation on crypto exchanges will be analysed, based on the exchanges’ strategy and different success factors. The diversity of jurisdictions covered by this paper provides also an overview how various governments have approached regulat-ing digital exchanges. Even though the cryptocurrency market out-side of Europe should not be underestimated, this paper focuses on the comparative analysis on digital exchanges operating within the EU. Including other exchanges would alter the conclusion since the quoted crypto-fiat pairs, users, and many other factors diverge from the European landscape.The expectation is to conclude that regulatory compliant digital exchanges are more successful on a long-term perspective.Eça, AfonsoRUNSzepesi, Laura2020-12-11T15:58:18Z2020-06-0320202020-06-03T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/108486TID:202524345enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:53:00Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/108486Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:41:11.376253Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cryptocurrency exchange landscape in the EU How regulation impacts success of cryptocurrency exchanges
title Cryptocurrency exchange landscape in the EU How regulation impacts success of cryptocurrency exchanges
spellingShingle Cryptocurrency exchange landscape in the EU How regulation impacts success of cryptocurrency exchanges
Szepesi, Laura
Cryptocurrency
Block chain
Bitcoin
Digital exchanges
Peer-to-Peer
Finance
Crypto regulation
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short Cryptocurrency exchange landscape in the EU How regulation impacts success of cryptocurrency exchanges
title_full Cryptocurrency exchange landscape in the EU How regulation impacts success of cryptocurrency exchanges
title_fullStr Cryptocurrency exchange landscape in the EU How regulation impacts success of cryptocurrency exchanges
title_full_unstemmed Cryptocurrency exchange landscape in the EU How regulation impacts success of cryptocurrency exchanges
title_sort Cryptocurrency exchange landscape in the EU How regulation impacts success of cryptocurrency exchanges
author Szepesi, Laura
author_facet Szepesi, Laura
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Eça, Afonso
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Szepesi, Laura
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cryptocurrency
Block chain
Bitcoin
Digital exchanges
Peer-to-Peer
Finance
Crypto regulation
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Cryptocurrency
Block chain
Bitcoin
Digital exchanges
Peer-to-Peer
Finance
Crypto regulation
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description Ever since the emergence of digital assets, bitcoin (BTC) and other crype to currencies created huge debates and discussions globally. Demand has transformed trading opportunitis in the digital era, and anew ecosystem has been created around cryptocurrencies. Not only the coins, but the underlying technology has found many applications worldwide as well, especially in the financial markets.However, since the market infrastructure is growing expeditiously,regulations have a hard time keeping up with the speed of innovation. Merging this complex and fast evolving area into the established traditional legal framework has already proved to be a difficult and lengthy process. Due to the absence of a global harmony in the regulatory frameworks, digital service providers can take advantage of the regulatory arbitrage. In order to maximize profitability, the decision on how to cope with the regulatory framework can be crucial for any service provider.The attitude towards regulation in this environment is just as fragmented as the legislations itself. Founder and CEO of bit Flyer, Yuzo Kano made an announcement at the opening of the European office of bitFlyer:”When I set up bit Flyer in 2014, I did so with global ambitions and the belief that approved regulatory status is fundamental to the long-term future of Bitcoin and the virtual currency industry. I am proud that we are now the most compliant virtual currency exchange in the world; this coveted regulatory status gives our customers, our company and the virtual currency industry as a whole a verypositive future outlook[1].”A completely different approach was expressed by the CEO of Binance,Chang peng Zhao:“If you do fiat to crypto [. . . ] you have to have a bank account that can accept money,” he says. “That has its own advantages and problems. You have to deal with regulatory issues and usually you’retied to one country.”The more you deal with fiat, the more[authorities] can control you,” says Zhao. “The bank will freeze your bank account. They can make the wire transfer slow”[44].The strategical decisions of digital currency exchanges can be de-rived from their view on regulation. This paper will examine some of the top exchanges with a regional footprint in the European Union(EU). Furthermore, the impact of regulation on crypto exchanges will be analysed, based on the exchanges’ strategy and different success factors. The diversity of jurisdictions covered by this paper provides also an overview how various governments have approached regulat-ing digital exchanges. Even though the cryptocurrency market out-side of Europe should not be underestimated, this paper focuses on the comparative analysis on digital exchanges operating within the EU. Including other exchanges would alter the conclusion since the quoted crypto-fiat pairs, users, and many other factors diverge from the European landscape.The expectation is to conclude that regulatory compliant digital exchanges are more successful on a long-term perspective.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-11T15:58:18Z
2020-06-03
2020
2020-06-03T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/108486
TID:202524345
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/108486
identifier_str_mv TID:202524345
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138024836038656