Endovascular Treatment of Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysms: Single Center Experience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Machado, R.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Rego, D., Oliveira, P., Almeida, Rui.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2096
Resumo: Objective: Internal iliac artery aneurysms (IIAA) are rare, representing only 0.3% of aortoiliac aneurysms. Its treatment with open surgery is complex and associated with high morbidity and mortality, which led to increasing application of endovascular solutions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of IIAA in one institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of IIAA treated with endovascular techniques between 2003 and 2014. Endpoints were morbidity, mortality, freedom from pelvic ischemic symptoms (buttock claudication, ischemic colitis, and spinal cord injury), and need for reintervention. Results: There were 16 patients, 13 males and 3 females, with mean age of 75.1±7 years. A total of 20 IIAA (4 cases were bilateral), with mean diameter of 37.9 mm, were treated. EVAR was performed in 13 (81.3%) patients, with associated internal iliac artery's outflow occlusion in 2. Iliac branch device was used in one patient. Two patients underwent endovascular IIAA embolization alone. One patient underwent percutaneous, transgluteal, IIAA embolization. IIAA flow preservation in at least one internal iliac artery was possible in 9 (56.3%) patients. Early mortality was 7% (1 case). Early morbidity was 18.8%. Pelvic ischemic complications occurred in 1 (7%) patient with buttock claudication. Late reintervention was needed in 3 patients, none of them for IIAA related complications. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment of IIAA is technically feasible and durable. Although overall morbidity is relatively high, major complications are infrequent and perioperative mortality is low. internal iliac artery flow preservation is technically challenging and, in a significant number of cases, not possible at all.
id RCAP_23c3d9270fdff0b9cf54acf26b0666c8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/2096
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Endovascular Treatment of Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysms: Single Center ExperienceEndovascular ProceduresIliac AneurysmEmbolizationTherapeuticObjective: Internal iliac artery aneurysms (IIAA) are rare, representing only 0.3% of aortoiliac aneurysms. Its treatment with open surgery is complex and associated with high morbidity and mortality, which led to increasing application of endovascular solutions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of IIAA in one institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of IIAA treated with endovascular techniques between 2003 and 2014. Endpoints were morbidity, mortality, freedom from pelvic ischemic symptoms (buttock claudication, ischemic colitis, and spinal cord injury), and need for reintervention. Results: There were 16 patients, 13 males and 3 females, with mean age of 75.1±7 years. A total of 20 IIAA (4 cases were bilateral), with mean diameter of 37.9 mm, were treated. EVAR was performed in 13 (81.3%) patients, with associated internal iliac artery's outflow occlusion in 2. Iliac branch device was used in one patient. Two patients underwent endovascular IIAA embolization alone. One patient underwent percutaneous, transgluteal, IIAA embolization. IIAA flow preservation in at least one internal iliac artery was possible in 9 (56.3%) patients. Early mortality was 7% (1 case). Early morbidity was 18.8%. Pelvic ischemic complications occurred in 1 (7%) patient with buttock claudication. Late reintervention was needed in 3 patients, none of them for IIAA related complications. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment of IIAA is technically feasible and durable. Although overall morbidity is relatively high, major complications are infrequent and perioperative mortality is low. internal iliac artery flow preservation is technically challenging and, in a significant number of cases, not possible at all.Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular SurgeryRepositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar do PortoMachado, R.Rego, D.Oliveira, P.Almeida, Rui.2017-05-22T09:51:49Z2016-04-01T00:00:00Z2016-04-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2096engBraz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;31(2):127-31.0102-763810.5935/1678-9741.20160023info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-05T12:40:39ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Endovascular Treatment of Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysms: Single Center Experience
title Endovascular Treatment of Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysms: Single Center Experience
spellingShingle Endovascular Treatment of Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysms: Single Center Experience
Machado, R.
Endovascular Procedures
Iliac Aneurysm
Embolization
Therapeutic
title_short Endovascular Treatment of Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysms: Single Center Experience
title_full Endovascular Treatment of Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysms: Single Center Experience
title_fullStr Endovascular Treatment of Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysms: Single Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Endovascular Treatment of Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysms: Single Center Experience
title_sort Endovascular Treatment of Internal Iliac Artery Aneurysms: Single Center Experience
author Machado, R.
author_facet Machado, R.
Rego, D.
Oliveira, P.
Almeida, Rui.
author_role author
author2 Rego, D.
Oliveira, P.
Almeida, Rui.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar do Porto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Machado, R.
Rego, D.
Oliveira, P.
Almeida, Rui.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endovascular Procedures
Iliac Aneurysm
Embolization
Therapeutic
topic Endovascular Procedures
Iliac Aneurysm
Embolization
Therapeutic
description Objective: Internal iliac artery aneurysms (IIAA) are rare, representing only 0.3% of aortoiliac aneurysms. Its treatment with open surgery is complex and associated with high morbidity and mortality, which led to increasing application of endovascular solutions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of IIAA in one institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of IIAA treated with endovascular techniques between 2003 and 2014. Endpoints were morbidity, mortality, freedom from pelvic ischemic symptoms (buttock claudication, ischemic colitis, and spinal cord injury), and need for reintervention. Results: There were 16 patients, 13 males and 3 females, with mean age of 75.1±7 years. A total of 20 IIAA (4 cases were bilateral), with mean diameter of 37.9 mm, were treated. EVAR was performed in 13 (81.3%) patients, with associated internal iliac artery's outflow occlusion in 2. Iliac branch device was used in one patient. Two patients underwent endovascular IIAA embolization alone. One patient underwent percutaneous, transgluteal, IIAA embolization. IIAA flow preservation in at least one internal iliac artery was possible in 9 (56.3%) patients. Early mortality was 7% (1 case). Early morbidity was 18.8%. Pelvic ischemic complications occurred in 1 (7%) patient with buttock claudication. Late reintervention was needed in 3 patients, none of them for IIAA related complications. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment of IIAA is technically feasible and durable. Although overall morbidity is relatively high, major complications are infrequent and perioperative mortality is low. internal iliac artery flow preservation is technically challenging and, in a significant number of cases, not possible at all.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-01T00:00:00Z
2016-04-01T00:00:00Z
2017-05-22T09:51:49Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2096
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2096
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;31(2):127-31.
0102-7638
10.5935/1678-9741.20160023
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777301181930930176