Environmental and acoustic assessment: The AOB concept

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, N.
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Soares, C., Jesus, S. M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/7357
Resumo: The requirement for rapid environmental assessment has motivated the development of prediction tools, which allow the observation and prediction in very short notice, of the ocean evolution in an interval up to 3-4 weeks, in given littoral areas. Complex systems exist nowadays, where multidimensional quantities like the oceanographic-biogeochemical-optical-acoustic fields, are tracked in time, melding measures and models of some or all the involved quantities. At some point in the prediction system, the acoustic forecast is computed by acoustic propagation models taking as input the environmental forecast. Inevitably, the error of the acoustic forecast as given by the model output, originates from at least two error sources. The first is the environmental forecast error. The second is due to the model inaccuracies, and to the dependence of propagation on parameters not dealt with by the prediction system, like geometric or geo-acoustic properties. The acoustic community has developed a large number of acoustic inversion systems - based on e.g. matched-field processors or travel-time tomography - from which one can learn that an accurate acoustic simulation requires feeding the acoustic model with an environment which differs from the actual environment by a certain gap. This requires that the environmental forecast as given by ocean prediction systems be gap-compensated, prior to its inclusion in the acoustic environmental input. This paper puts the environmental gap in evidence, considering environmental forecasts, and historical and inverted data, to define heterogeneous environmental inputs to the propagation model. The corresponding acoustic outputs are compared to actual data from the MREA '03 sea trial. It is observed that acoustic inversion can play a significant role in converting the environmental forecast into the acoustic forecast. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
id RCAP_2718bdab847bb7336fab8384e9bf6661
oai_identifier_str oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/7357
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Environmental and acoustic assessment: The AOB conceptThe requirement for rapid environmental assessment has motivated the development of prediction tools, which allow the observation and prediction in very short notice, of the ocean evolution in an interval up to 3-4 weeks, in given littoral areas. Complex systems exist nowadays, where multidimensional quantities like the oceanographic-biogeochemical-optical-acoustic fields, are tracked in time, melding measures and models of some or all the involved quantities. At some point in the prediction system, the acoustic forecast is computed by acoustic propagation models taking as input the environmental forecast. Inevitably, the error of the acoustic forecast as given by the model output, originates from at least two error sources. The first is the environmental forecast error. The second is due to the model inaccuracies, and to the dependence of propagation on parameters not dealt with by the prediction system, like geometric or geo-acoustic properties. The acoustic community has developed a large number of acoustic inversion systems - based on e.g. matched-field processors or travel-time tomography - from which one can learn that an accurate acoustic simulation requires feeding the acoustic model with an environment which differs from the actual environment by a certain gap. This requires that the environmental forecast as given by ocean prediction systems be gap-compensated, prior to its inclusion in the acoustic environmental input. This paper puts the environmental gap in evidence, considering environmental forecasts, and historical and inverted data, to define heterogeneous environmental inputs to the propagation model. The corresponding acoustic outputs are compared to actual data from the MREA '03 sea trial. It is observed that acoustic inversion can play a significant role in converting the environmental forecast into the acoustic forecast. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.ElsevierSapientiaMartins, N.Soares, C.Jesus, S. M.2015-12-15T15:51:27Z20082008-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/7357eng0924-7963AUT: SJE00662;https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.02.003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-24T10:18:29Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/7357Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:59:45.766891Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Environmental and acoustic assessment: The AOB concept
title Environmental and acoustic assessment: The AOB concept
spellingShingle Environmental and acoustic assessment: The AOB concept
Martins, N.
title_short Environmental and acoustic assessment: The AOB concept
title_full Environmental and acoustic assessment: The AOB concept
title_fullStr Environmental and acoustic assessment: The AOB concept
title_full_unstemmed Environmental and acoustic assessment: The AOB concept
title_sort Environmental and acoustic assessment: The AOB concept
author Martins, N.
author_facet Martins, N.
Soares, C.
Jesus, S. M.
author_role author
author2 Soares, C.
Jesus, S. M.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sapientia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, N.
Soares, C.
Jesus, S. M.
description The requirement for rapid environmental assessment has motivated the development of prediction tools, which allow the observation and prediction in very short notice, of the ocean evolution in an interval up to 3-4 weeks, in given littoral areas. Complex systems exist nowadays, where multidimensional quantities like the oceanographic-biogeochemical-optical-acoustic fields, are tracked in time, melding measures and models of some or all the involved quantities. At some point in the prediction system, the acoustic forecast is computed by acoustic propagation models taking as input the environmental forecast. Inevitably, the error of the acoustic forecast as given by the model output, originates from at least two error sources. The first is the environmental forecast error. The second is due to the model inaccuracies, and to the dependence of propagation on parameters not dealt with by the prediction system, like geometric or geo-acoustic properties. The acoustic community has developed a large number of acoustic inversion systems - based on e.g. matched-field processors or travel-time tomography - from which one can learn that an accurate acoustic simulation requires feeding the acoustic model with an environment which differs from the actual environment by a certain gap. This requires that the environmental forecast as given by ocean prediction systems be gap-compensated, prior to its inclusion in the acoustic environmental input. This paper puts the environmental gap in evidence, considering environmental forecasts, and historical and inverted data, to define heterogeneous environmental inputs to the propagation model. The corresponding acoustic outputs are compared to actual data from the MREA '03 sea trial. It is observed that acoustic inversion can play a significant role in converting the environmental forecast into the acoustic forecast. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z
2015-12-15T15:51:27Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/7357
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/7357
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0924-7963
AUT: SJE00662;
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.02.003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133221127979008