Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Recommendations in Portugal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Célia
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Gonçalo, Margarida, GPEU – Grupo Português de Estudos de Urticária, On behalf of
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294
Resumo: Chronic spontaneous urticaria is a complex disorder, of unclear etiology, easily diagnosed although often difficult to treat. It has a significant impact on the patients’ quality of life and results in high direct and indirect costs. The diagnosis of chronic spontaneous urticaria is mainly clinical and a limited number of tests is recommended for differential diagnosis and/or for the investigation/exclusion of possible causes. In addition to the complete blood count and C-reactive protein, and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, additional tests must be selected according to clinical criteria. The aim of therapy is the complete clinical control of chronic spontaneous urticaria. Evolution should be documented by weekly symptom scoring – Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) –, as well as the assessment of quality of life. The therapeutic approach is based on second-generation H1 antihistamines (anti-H1) administered continuously in the approved doses (first line), and, in the absence of a clinical response, up to four times the daily-approved dose (second line). First generation H1 antihistamines are not recommended. Approximately 30% of patients are not controlled with second line therapy, and it is recommended to add a third line therapy. Of the two options, omalizumab and cyclosporine, only omalizumab is approved for chronic spontaneous urticaria and has a better safety profile, thus being preferably recommended. In Portugal there are no national-based recommendations applicable to clinical practice. The elaboration of these recommendations is justified by the need to standardize both the diagnosis and the treatment approach of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria in Portugal, and for the referral of patients to specialized centers, in the most severe cases.
id RCAP_297144625975a42f106c4e4337d85134
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8294
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Recommendations in PortugalAbordagem Diagnóstica e Terapêutica da Urticária Crónica Espontânea: Recomendações em PortugalChronic DiseaseHistamine H1 AntagonistsOmalizumabPractice GuidelinesUrticaria/diagnosisUrticaria/therapy.Anti-histamínicos H1CiclosporinaDoença CrónicaOmalizumabUrticária/diagnósticoUrticária/tratamento.Chronic spontaneous urticaria is a complex disorder, of unclear etiology, easily diagnosed although often difficult to treat. It has a significant impact on the patients’ quality of life and results in high direct and indirect costs. The diagnosis of chronic spontaneous urticaria is mainly clinical and a limited number of tests is recommended for differential diagnosis and/or for the investigation/exclusion of possible causes. In addition to the complete blood count and C-reactive protein, and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, additional tests must be selected according to clinical criteria. The aim of therapy is the complete clinical control of chronic spontaneous urticaria. Evolution should be documented by weekly symptom scoring – Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) –, as well as the assessment of quality of life. The therapeutic approach is based on second-generation H1 antihistamines (anti-H1) administered continuously in the approved doses (first line), and, in the absence of a clinical response, up to four times the daily-approved dose (second line). First generation H1 antihistamines are not recommended. Approximately 30% of patients are not controlled with second line therapy, and it is recommended to add a third line therapy. Of the two options, omalizumab and cyclosporine, only omalizumab is approved for chronic spontaneous urticaria and has a better safety profile, thus being preferably recommended. In Portugal there are no national-based recommendations applicable to clinical practice. The elaboration of these recommendations is justified by the need to standardize both the diagnosis and the treatment approach of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria in Portugal, and for the referral of patients to specialized centers, in the most severe cases.A urticária crónica espontânea é uma doença complexa, de etiologia mal-esclarecida, de diagnóstico fácil mas de abordagem terapêutica por vezes difícil. Tem um impacto significativo na qualidade de vida do doente e resulta em elevados custos diretos e indiretos. O diagnóstico da urticária crónica espontânea é essencialmente clínico, sendo recomendado um número limitado de exames complementares para diagnóstico diferencial e/ou para a investigação/exclusão de possível causa para a urticária crónica espontânea. Além do hemograma e da proteína C reativa, e/ou velocidade de sedimentação, os exames adicionais devem ser selecionados de acordo com critérios clínicos. O objetivo da terapêutica é o controlo clínico total da urticária crónica espontânea. A evolução deve ser documentada através do registo semanal do score de sintomas – Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) –, assim como da avaliação de qualidade de vida. A abordagem terapêutica é baseada nos anti- histamínicos H1 (anti-H1) de segunda geração administrados de forma contínua nas doses aprovadas (primeira linha) e, na ausência de resposta clínica, até quatro vezes a dose diária aprovada (segunda linha). Os anti-H1 de primeira geração não são recomendados. Cerca de 30% dos doentes não ficam controlados com a terapêutica de segunda linha, pelo que é recomendado adicionar uma terapêutica de terceira linha. Das duas opções, omalizumab e ciclosporina, o omalizumab é a única opção com autorização de introdução no mercado para a urticária crónica espontânea, e possui melhor perfil de segurança, sendo assim recomendado preferencialmente. Em Portugal não existem recomendações nacionais aplicáveis à prática clínica. A elaboração destas recomendações é justificada pela necessidade de uniformização tanto da abordagem diagnóstica como da abordagem terapêutica dos doentes com urticária crónica espontânea em Portugal, e para a referenciação a centros especializados, nos casos mais graves.Ordem dos Médicos2016-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8294Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 No. 11 (2016): November; 763-781Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 N.º 11 (2016): Novembro; 763-7811646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294/4830https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294/4831https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294/8804https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294/8874Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, CéliaGonçalo, MargaridaGPEU – Grupo Português de Estudos de Urticária, On behalf of2022-12-20T11:05:29ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Recommendations in Portugal
Abordagem Diagnóstica e Terapêutica da Urticária Crónica Espontânea: Recomendações em Portugal
title Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Recommendations in Portugal
spellingShingle Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Recommendations in Portugal
Costa, Célia
Chronic Disease
Histamine H1 Antagonists
Omalizumab
Practice Guidelines
Urticaria/diagnosis
Urticaria/therapy.
Anti-histamínicos H1
Ciclosporina
Doença Crónica
Omalizumab
Urticária/diagnóstico
Urticária/tratamento.
title_short Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Recommendations in Portugal
title_full Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Recommendations in Portugal
title_fullStr Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Recommendations in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Recommendations in Portugal
title_sort Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Recommendations in Portugal
author Costa, Célia
author_facet Costa, Célia
Gonçalo, Margarida
GPEU – Grupo Português de Estudos de Urticária, On behalf of
author_role author
author2 Gonçalo, Margarida
GPEU – Grupo Português de Estudos de Urticária, On behalf of
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Célia
Gonçalo, Margarida
GPEU – Grupo Português de Estudos de Urticária, On behalf of
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chronic Disease
Histamine H1 Antagonists
Omalizumab
Practice Guidelines
Urticaria/diagnosis
Urticaria/therapy.
Anti-histamínicos H1
Ciclosporina
Doença Crónica
Omalizumab
Urticária/diagnóstico
Urticária/tratamento.
topic Chronic Disease
Histamine H1 Antagonists
Omalizumab
Practice Guidelines
Urticaria/diagnosis
Urticaria/therapy.
Anti-histamínicos H1
Ciclosporina
Doença Crónica
Omalizumab
Urticária/diagnóstico
Urticária/tratamento.
description Chronic spontaneous urticaria is a complex disorder, of unclear etiology, easily diagnosed although often difficult to treat. It has a significant impact on the patients’ quality of life and results in high direct and indirect costs. The diagnosis of chronic spontaneous urticaria is mainly clinical and a limited number of tests is recommended for differential diagnosis and/or for the investigation/exclusion of possible causes. In addition to the complete blood count and C-reactive protein, and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, additional tests must be selected according to clinical criteria. The aim of therapy is the complete clinical control of chronic spontaneous urticaria. Evolution should be documented by weekly symptom scoring – Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) –, as well as the assessment of quality of life. The therapeutic approach is based on second-generation H1 antihistamines (anti-H1) administered continuously in the approved doses (first line), and, in the absence of a clinical response, up to four times the daily-approved dose (second line). First generation H1 antihistamines are not recommended. Approximately 30% of patients are not controlled with second line therapy, and it is recommended to add a third line therapy. Of the two options, omalizumab and cyclosporine, only omalizumab is approved for chronic spontaneous urticaria and has a better safety profile, thus being preferably recommended. In Portugal there are no national-based recommendations applicable to clinical practice. The elaboration of these recommendations is justified by the need to standardize both the diagnosis and the treatment approach of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria in Portugal, and for the referral of patients to specialized centers, in the most severe cases.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8294
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8294
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294/4830
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294/4831
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294/8804
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8294/8874
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 No. 11 (2016): November; 763-781
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 N.º 11 (2016): Novembro; 763-781
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777301649879990272