Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amaro, Ana M.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Neto, Maria A., Cirne, José S., Reis, Paulo N. B.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/107146
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091428
Resumo: Samples having nominal compositions of AlSi12 and Al6082-T4 were prepared using a lost wax casting process, with nominal relative densities of 20%, 40%, and 60%, as well as arrangements of a uniform cell structure (US) or a dual-size cell (DS). For comparison, samples of aluminium foam-filled tubes having the same nominal composition were also prepared with the same technique, with nominal relative densities of 20% and similar arrangements (US and DS). Impact tests at different velocities were performed using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). It is possible to conclude that Al6082-T4 foams have better performance, in both configurations, than the AlSi12 ones. Considering a uniform cell structure and a density of 20%, the absorbed energy by the Al6082-T4 foams was around 25% higher than the value observed for the AlSi12 ones. In terms of arrangement, the US structure presents absorbed energy around 57% lower than the DS ones, while the AlSi12 foams with a relative density of 20% were compared. Finally, the absorbed energy growths from 2.8 × 105 to 5.2 × 105 J/m3, when the density increased from 20% to 60%. However, when these foams were involved with a tube, the performances increased substantially.
id RCAP_315fb65b029786f7ceb753ae38ca3ff8
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/107146
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Ratesaluminium foamshigh strain ratesSplit Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB)mechanical propertiesSamples having nominal compositions of AlSi12 and Al6082-T4 were prepared using a lost wax casting process, with nominal relative densities of 20%, 40%, and 60%, as well as arrangements of a uniform cell structure (US) or a dual-size cell (DS). For comparison, samples of aluminium foam-filled tubes having the same nominal composition were also prepared with the same technique, with nominal relative densities of 20% and similar arrangements (US and DS). Impact tests at different velocities were performed using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). It is possible to conclude that Al6082-T4 foams have better performance, in both configurations, than the AlSi12 ones. Considering a uniform cell structure and a density of 20%, the absorbed energy by the Al6082-T4 foams was around 25% higher than the value observed for the AlSi12 ones. In terms of arrangement, the US structure presents absorbed energy around 57% lower than the DS ones, while the AlSi12 foams with a relative density of 20% were compared. Finally, the absorbed energy growths from 2.8 × 105 to 5.2 × 105 J/m3, when the density increased from 20% to 60%. However, when these foams were involved with a tube, the performances increased substantially.MDPI2019-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/107146http://hdl.handle.net/10316/107146https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091428eng1996-1944Amaro, Ana M.Neto, Maria A.Cirne, José S.Reis, Paulo N. B.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-06-12T08:38:16Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/107146Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:23:30.575631Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
title Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
spellingShingle Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
Amaro, Ana M.
aluminium foams
high strain rates
Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB)
mechanical properties
title_short Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
title_full Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
title_fullStr Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
title_sort Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
author Amaro, Ana M.
author_facet Amaro, Ana M.
Neto, Maria A.
Cirne, José S.
Reis, Paulo N. B.
author_role author
author2 Neto, Maria A.
Cirne, José S.
Reis, Paulo N. B.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amaro, Ana M.
Neto, Maria A.
Cirne, José S.
Reis, Paulo N. B.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aluminium foams
high strain rates
Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB)
mechanical properties
topic aluminium foams
high strain rates
Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB)
mechanical properties
description Samples having nominal compositions of AlSi12 and Al6082-T4 were prepared using a lost wax casting process, with nominal relative densities of 20%, 40%, and 60%, as well as arrangements of a uniform cell structure (US) or a dual-size cell (DS). For comparison, samples of aluminium foam-filled tubes having the same nominal composition were also prepared with the same technique, with nominal relative densities of 20% and similar arrangements (US and DS). Impact tests at different velocities were performed using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). It is possible to conclude that Al6082-T4 foams have better performance, in both configurations, than the AlSi12 ones. Considering a uniform cell structure and a density of 20%, the absorbed energy by the Al6082-T4 foams was around 25% higher than the value observed for the AlSi12 ones. In terms of arrangement, the US structure presents absorbed energy around 57% lower than the DS ones, while the AlSi12 foams with a relative density of 20% were compared. Finally, the absorbed energy growths from 2.8 × 105 to 5.2 × 105 J/m3, when the density increased from 20% to 60%. However, when these foams were involved with a tube, the performances increased substantially.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/107146
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/107146
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091428
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/107146
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091428
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1996-1944
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134122165141504