Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, A.
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Hill, M. M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-10423
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/13396
Resumo: Perceptions of organisational culture made by three categories of staff playing managerial roles in each of two Portuguese Universities (one public and the other private) were compared using a questionnaire adapted from the Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument and translated into Portuguese. The four scales of the questionnaire, designed to measure the Cultures of Clan, Adhocracy, Hierarchy and Market orientation were found to have adequate internal reliabilities, though a factor analysis raised doubts about the construct (factor) validity of two of the scales (Clan and Adhocracy). Application of a MANOVA to scores on the four scales of organisational culture showed, as hypothesised, that the private university was perceived to have significantly stronger cultures of Market orientation and Hierarchy than the public university. No overall difference was found between the universities for the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy. However, general managerial staff in both Universities perceived the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy to be stronger than was the case for technical managerial staff.
id RCAP_386d0ba23ad72a00fbf08f3610d55748
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/13396
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case studyOrganisational cultureAssessmentPortuguese higher educationCompeting valuesManagerial rolePerceptions of organisational culture made by three categories of staff playing managerial roles in each of two Portuguese Universities (one public and the other private) were compared using a questionnaire adapted from the Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument and translated into Portuguese. The four scales of the questionnaire, designed to measure the Cultures of Clan, Adhocracy, Hierarchy and Market orientation were found to have adequate internal reliabilities, though a factor analysis raised doubts about the construct (factor) validity of two of the scales (Clan and Adhocracy). Application of a MANOVA to scores on the four scales of organisational culture showed, as hypothesised, that the private university was perceived to have significantly stronger cultures of Market orientation and Hierarchy than the public university. No overall difference was found between the universities for the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy. However, general managerial staff in both Universities perceived the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy to be stronger than was the case for technical managerial staff.Kluwer Academic Publishers2017-05-16T15:00:45Z2008-01-01T00:00:00Z20082017-05-16T14:57:54Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-10423http://hdl.handle.net/10071/13396eng0018-156010.1007/s10734-007-9080-6Ferreira, A.Hill, M. M.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:31:07Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/13396Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:13:59.244336Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study
title Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study
spellingShingle Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study
Ferreira, A.
Organisational culture
Assessment
Portuguese higher education
Competing values
Managerial role
title_short Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study
title_full Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study
title_fullStr Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study
title_sort Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study
author Ferreira, A.
author_facet Ferreira, A.
Hill, M. M.
author_role author
author2 Hill, M. M.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, A.
Hill, M. M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Organisational culture
Assessment
Portuguese higher education
Competing values
Managerial role
topic Organisational culture
Assessment
Portuguese higher education
Competing values
Managerial role
description Perceptions of organisational culture made by three categories of staff playing managerial roles in each of two Portuguese Universities (one public and the other private) were compared using a questionnaire adapted from the Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument and translated into Portuguese. The four scales of the questionnaire, designed to measure the Cultures of Clan, Adhocracy, Hierarchy and Market orientation were found to have adequate internal reliabilities, though a factor analysis raised doubts about the construct (factor) validity of two of the scales (Clan and Adhocracy). Application of a MANOVA to scores on the four scales of organisational culture showed, as hypothesised, that the private university was perceived to have significantly stronger cultures of Market orientation and Hierarchy than the public university. No overall difference was found between the universities for the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy. However, general managerial staff in both Universities perceived the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy to be stronger than was the case for technical managerial staff.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-01-01T00:00:00Z
2008
2017-05-16T15:00:45Z
2017-05-16T14:57:54Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-10423
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/13396
url https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-10423
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/13396
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0018-1560
10.1007/s10734-007-9080-6
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Kluwer Academic Publishers
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Kluwer Academic Publishers
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134696660008960