We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/2344 |
Resumo: | Mostly invigorated by infrahumanisation theory, our knowledge on processes of dehumanisation in intergroup relations has grown considerably in the last decade. Building on these earlier endeavours, the present chapter reviews some recent empirical extensions that highlight the importance of differentiating between ingroup humanisation and outgroup dehumanisation because they are often moderated by specific variables. The role of these separate processes is discussed as a function of the main structural elements that define intergroup behaviour; that is, the defining boundaries of the groups, the relation between the groups at hand, and the ideologies of its members. Finally, the role of the different senses of humanness is discussed, suggesting that the folk conception of humanness differs between cultures. |
id |
RCAP_3b52570124e36c2494f55aa596490ba7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/2344 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroupOutgroup dehumanisationIngroup humanisationIntergroup boundariesIntergroup relationsIdeologiesMostly invigorated by infrahumanisation theory, our knowledge on processes of dehumanisation in intergroup relations has grown considerably in the last decade. Building on these earlier endeavours, the present chapter reviews some recent empirical extensions that highlight the importance of differentiating between ingroup humanisation and outgroup dehumanisation because they are often moderated by specific variables. The role of these separate processes is discussed as a function of the main structural elements that define intergroup behaviour; that is, the defining boundaries of the groups, the relation between the groups at hand, and the ideologies of its members. Finally, the role of the different senses of humanness is discussed, suggesting that the folk conception of humanness differs between cultures.Taylor & Francis GroupRepositório do ISPAVaes, JeroenLeyens, Jacques-PhilippePaladino, Maria PaolaMiranda, Mariana Pires2013-09-11T14:49:00Z2012-01-01T00:00:00Z2012-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/2344engEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 23 (1), 64-761046-3283info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-05T16:38:16Zoai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/2344Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:20:20.089720Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup |
title |
We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup |
spellingShingle |
We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup Vaes, Jeroen Outgroup dehumanisation Ingroup humanisation Intergroup boundaries Intergroup relations Ideologies |
title_short |
We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup |
title_full |
We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup |
title_fullStr |
We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup |
title_full_unstemmed |
We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup |
title_sort |
We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup |
author |
Vaes, Jeroen |
author_facet |
Vaes, Jeroen Leyens, Jacques-Philippe Paladino, Maria Paola Miranda, Mariana Pires |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leyens, Jacques-Philippe Paladino, Maria Paola Miranda, Mariana Pires |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório do ISPA |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vaes, Jeroen Leyens, Jacques-Philippe Paladino, Maria Paola Miranda, Mariana Pires |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Outgroup dehumanisation Ingroup humanisation Intergroup boundaries Intergroup relations Ideologies |
topic |
Outgroup dehumanisation Ingroup humanisation Intergroup boundaries Intergroup relations Ideologies |
description |
Mostly invigorated by infrahumanisation theory, our knowledge on processes of dehumanisation in intergroup relations has grown considerably in the last decade. Building on these earlier endeavours, the present chapter reviews some recent empirical extensions that highlight the importance of differentiating between ingroup humanisation and outgroup dehumanisation because they are often moderated by specific variables. The role of these separate processes is discussed as a function of the main structural elements that define intergroup behaviour; that is, the defining boundaries of the groups, the relation between the groups at hand, and the ideologies of its members. Finally, the role of the different senses of humanness is discussed, suggesting that the folk conception of humanness differs between cultures. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z 2013-09-11T14:49:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/2344 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/2344 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
European Review of Social Psychology, 23 (1), 64-76 1046-3283 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130064560848896 |