Perinatal Outcome in Relation to Chorionicity in Twin Pregnancy

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Machado, Marta
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Lima Teixeira, Elsa, Ferreira, Lígia Maria, Rodrigues, Filipa, Henriques, Raquel, Afonso, Eulália
Format: Article
Language: por
eng
Source: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Download full: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133
Summary: Introduction: The incidence of multiple gestations is increasing worldwide and many studies have shown higher perinatal morbidity and mortality rates in monochorionic twins compared to dichorionic. The aim of this study was to assess the twin population born at a tertiary center and to evaluate the impact of chorionicity on perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of all twins born in a tertiary center from January 2004 to December 2013.Results: In this period, 1051 twins were born, related to 540 gestations (26.7% monochorionic; 73.3% dichorionic). There was no statistical significant difference between the groups concerning obstetric complications. The monochorionic group had a higher incidence of intrauterine growth restriction (20.5 vs 11.3%, p < 0.001), lower mean maternal age (29.9 vs 31.9 years, p < 0.001), lower mean gestational age (33.4 vs 34.3 weeks, p < 0.05) and lower mean birth weight (1943 vs 2147 g, p < 0.001). Monochorionic twins had a higher incidence of hyaline membrane disease (7 vs 4%, p < 0.05), sepsis (10.3 vs 5.8%, p < 0.05) and anemia (9.5 vs 5.4%, p < 0.05). There were no statistical significant differences concerning necrotizing enterocolitis, intraperiventricular hemorrhage or retinopathy of prematurity. Perinatal mortality was higher in the monochorionic group (5.2 vs 2.9%, p < 0.05).Discussion: Monochorionic twins represent considerable challenges to both obstetricians and neonatologists and should be monitored and delivered at tertiary centers.Conclusion: Currently gemelarity has a major impact on total births. It would be interesting to develop protocols to standardize clinical approach to twins.
id RCAP_3dc2d0b5eae7df5a45ce223f394d68a5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7133
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Perinatal Outcome in Relation to Chorionicity in Twin PregnancyImpacto da Corionicidade nas Complicações Perinatais da Gestação GemelarChorionPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePregnancyTwinComplicações na GravidezCórionGravidez de GémeosResultado da GravidezIntroduction: The incidence of multiple gestations is increasing worldwide and many studies have shown higher perinatal morbidity and mortality rates in monochorionic twins compared to dichorionic. The aim of this study was to assess the twin population born at a tertiary center and to evaluate the impact of chorionicity on perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of all twins born in a tertiary center from January 2004 to December 2013.Results: In this period, 1051 twins were born, related to 540 gestations (26.7% monochorionic; 73.3% dichorionic). There was no statistical significant difference between the groups concerning obstetric complications. The monochorionic group had a higher incidence of intrauterine growth restriction (20.5 vs 11.3%, p < 0.001), lower mean maternal age (29.9 vs 31.9 years, p < 0.001), lower mean gestational age (33.4 vs 34.3 weeks, p < 0.05) and lower mean birth weight (1943 vs 2147 g, p < 0.001). Monochorionic twins had a higher incidence of hyaline membrane disease (7 vs 4%, p < 0.05), sepsis (10.3 vs 5.8%, p < 0.05) and anemia (9.5 vs 5.4%, p < 0.05). There were no statistical significant differences concerning necrotizing enterocolitis, intraperiventricular hemorrhage or retinopathy of prematurity. Perinatal mortality was higher in the monochorionic group (5.2 vs 2.9%, p < 0.05).Discussion: Monochorionic twins represent considerable challenges to both obstetricians and neonatologists and should be monitored and delivered at tertiary centers.Conclusion: Currently gemelarity has a major impact on total births. It would be interesting to develop protocols to standardize clinical approach to twins.Introdução: A incidência da gestação múltipla tem vindo a aumentar em todo o mundo e vários estudos têm demonstrado taxas de morbilidade e mortalidade mais elevadas nos gémeos monocoriónicos comparativamente com os bicoriónicos. Os objetivos deste trabalho foram: caracterizar a população de gémeos fruto de gravidez bifetal nascidos num hospital nível três e avaliar o impacto da corionicidade na morbimortalidade perinatal.Material e Métodos: Estudo retrospetivo de todos os gémeos fruto de gravidez bifetal nascidos num hospital nível três entre janeiro de 2004 e dezembro de 2013.Resultados: Neste período nasceram 1051 gémeos, fruto de 540 gestações (26,7% monocoriónicos; 73,3% bicoriónicos). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os dois grupos no respeitante às complicações obstétricas. No grupo monocoriónico verificou-se uma incidência mais elevada de restrição do crescimento intra-uterino (20,5 vs 11,3%, p < 0,001), idade materna mais baixa (29,9 vs 31,9 anos, p < 0,001), idade gestacional mais baixa (33,4 vs 34,3 semanas, p < 0,05) e peso de nascimento mais baixo (1943 vs 2147 g, p < 0,001). Os gémeos monocoriónicos tiveram uma incidência mais elevada de doença de membrana hialina (7 vs 4%, p < 0,05), sépsis (10,3 vs 5,8%, p < 0,05) e anemia (9,5 vs 5,4%, p < 0,05). Não se encontrou diferença estatisticamente significativa relativamente à ocorrência de enterocolite necrotizante, hemorragia intraperiventricular ou retinopatia da prematuridade. A mortalidade perinatal foi mais elevada no grupo monocoriónico (5,2 vs 2,9%, p < 0,05).Discussão: Os gémeos monocoriónicos representam um desafio para obstetras e neonatologistas, devendo a vigilância pré-natal e o parto ser realizados em centros de referência.Conclusão: A gemelaridade tem atualmente um importante impacto nos nascimentos, pelo que seria interessante desenvolver protocolos que uniformizassem a prática clínica na abordagem a estes recém-nascidos.Ordem dos Médicos2017-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/x-ms-bmpimage/jpegimage/x-ms-bmpapplication/mswordimage/jpegimage/x-ms-bmphttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7133Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2017): January; 12-16Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 1 (2017): Janeiro; 12-161646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/4888https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/5123https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8038https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8039https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8183https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8184https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8372https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8377Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMachado, MartaLima Teixeira, ElsaFerreira, Lígia MariaRodrigues, FilipaHenriques, RaquelAfonso, Eulália2022-12-20T11:05:06Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7133Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:25.007728Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Perinatal Outcome in Relation to Chorionicity in Twin Pregnancy
Impacto da Corionicidade nas Complicações Perinatais da Gestação Gemelar
title Perinatal Outcome in Relation to Chorionicity in Twin Pregnancy
spellingShingle Perinatal Outcome in Relation to Chorionicity in Twin Pregnancy
Machado, Marta
Chorion
Pregnancy Complications
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy
Twin
Complicações na Gravidez
Córion
Gravidez de Gémeos
Resultado da Gravidez
title_short Perinatal Outcome in Relation to Chorionicity in Twin Pregnancy
title_full Perinatal Outcome in Relation to Chorionicity in Twin Pregnancy
title_fullStr Perinatal Outcome in Relation to Chorionicity in Twin Pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Perinatal Outcome in Relation to Chorionicity in Twin Pregnancy
title_sort Perinatal Outcome in Relation to Chorionicity in Twin Pregnancy
author Machado, Marta
author_facet Machado, Marta
Lima Teixeira, Elsa
Ferreira, Lígia Maria
Rodrigues, Filipa
Henriques, Raquel
Afonso, Eulália
author_role author
author2 Lima Teixeira, Elsa
Ferreira, Lígia Maria
Rodrigues, Filipa
Henriques, Raquel
Afonso, Eulália
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Machado, Marta
Lima Teixeira, Elsa
Ferreira, Lígia Maria
Rodrigues, Filipa
Henriques, Raquel
Afonso, Eulália
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chorion
Pregnancy Complications
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy
Twin
Complicações na Gravidez
Córion
Gravidez de Gémeos
Resultado da Gravidez
topic Chorion
Pregnancy Complications
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy
Twin
Complicações na Gravidez
Córion
Gravidez de Gémeos
Resultado da Gravidez
description Introduction: The incidence of multiple gestations is increasing worldwide and many studies have shown higher perinatal morbidity and mortality rates in monochorionic twins compared to dichorionic. The aim of this study was to assess the twin population born at a tertiary center and to evaluate the impact of chorionicity on perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of all twins born in a tertiary center from January 2004 to December 2013.Results: In this period, 1051 twins were born, related to 540 gestations (26.7% monochorionic; 73.3% dichorionic). There was no statistical significant difference between the groups concerning obstetric complications. The monochorionic group had a higher incidence of intrauterine growth restriction (20.5 vs 11.3%, p < 0.001), lower mean maternal age (29.9 vs 31.9 years, p < 0.001), lower mean gestational age (33.4 vs 34.3 weeks, p < 0.05) and lower mean birth weight (1943 vs 2147 g, p < 0.001). Monochorionic twins had a higher incidence of hyaline membrane disease (7 vs 4%, p < 0.05), sepsis (10.3 vs 5.8%, p < 0.05) and anemia (9.5 vs 5.4%, p < 0.05). There were no statistical significant differences concerning necrotizing enterocolitis, intraperiventricular hemorrhage or retinopathy of prematurity. Perinatal mortality was higher in the monochorionic group (5.2 vs 2.9%, p < 0.05).Discussion: Monochorionic twins represent considerable challenges to both obstetricians and neonatologists and should be monitored and delivered at tertiary centers.Conclusion: Currently gemelarity has a major impact on total births. It would be interesting to develop protocols to standardize clinical approach to twins.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7133
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7133
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/4888
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/5123
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8038
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8039
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8183
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8184
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8372
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7133/8377
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
image/x-ms-bmp
image/jpeg
image/x-ms-bmp
application/msword
image/jpeg
image/x-ms-bmp
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2017): January; 12-16
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 1 (2017): Janeiro; 12-16
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130644963393536