Major Concerns and Systematic literature Review on Enterprise Resource Planning

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Emanuel João da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/43128
Resumo: Organizations seek to optimize their business processes and one of the best ways to achieve this goal is to implement an Enterprise Resource Planning system. ERP systems have evolved in recent decades with the aim of helping organizations improve the way they work and increase their performance. These systems have differentiated and flexible characteristics and can provide opportunities for growth and sustainability for large companies, but also for small and medium-sized companies. This dissertation addresses the major concerns on ERP systems through a systematic review of a decade of research (2011- 2021). Publications from the last decade addressed different themes and topics in different phases of ERP life cycle and used different study methodologies. Researchers have played a leading role in the study and understanding of ERP systems adopted in the most different contexts. The systematic review carried out was based on the structure and organization of PRISMA 2020, a document developed to facilitate the creation of systematic reviews and served as a methodological guide. Based on a systematic review, it was defined a taxonomy to characterize and categorize study methodologies, life cycle phases, and major concerns. The definition of a work methodology was important to guarantee a cohesive, solid, and sustainable work. The publications analysed in this research were obtained following the guidelines of the previously defined methodology and came from scientific repositories available at B-on, respectively, ACM, EBSCO, IEEE, SAGE, Scopus, Taylor & Francis, WoS. The first search phase obtained 2610 publications. After applying the eligibility criteria, a final result with 126 eligible publications was get, which were the basis of this study. There was a clear preference for case studies among the categories of research methods. Regarding the various phases of the ERP life cycle, implementation, operation, and decision were the most studied phases in the eligible publications. Implementation, integration approaches, user participation, decision making, and risks management were the top five concerns on ERP systems out of a list of twenty-two. These and other results were presented and discussed. Finally, main industry and academia contributions and some limitations were presented, and possible future works were proposed.
id RCAP_3f213710e051470eb6786e618cc04097
oai_identifier_str oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/43128
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Major Concerns and Systematic literature Review on Enterprise Resource PlanningEnterprise resource planningERPLiterature analysisERP trendsERP concernsERP evolutionSystematic literature reviewPRISMAOrganizations seek to optimize their business processes and one of the best ways to achieve this goal is to implement an Enterprise Resource Planning system. ERP systems have evolved in recent decades with the aim of helping organizations improve the way they work and increase their performance. These systems have differentiated and flexible characteristics and can provide opportunities for growth and sustainability for large companies, but also for small and medium-sized companies. This dissertation addresses the major concerns on ERP systems through a systematic review of a decade of research (2011- 2021). Publications from the last decade addressed different themes and topics in different phases of ERP life cycle and used different study methodologies. Researchers have played a leading role in the study and understanding of ERP systems adopted in the most different contexts. The systematic review carried out was based on the structure and organization of PRISMA 2020, a document developed to facilitate the creation of systematic reviews and served as a methodological guide. Based on a systematic review, it was defined a taxonomy to characterize and categorize study methodologies, life cycle phases, and major concerns. The definition of a work methodology was important to guarantee a cohesive, solid, and sustainable work. The publications analysed in this research were obtained following the guidelines of the previously defined methodology and came from scientific repositories available at B-on, respectively, ACM, EBSCO, IEEE, SAGE, Scopus, Taylor & Francis, WoS. The first search phase obtained 2610 publications. After applying the eligibility criteria, a final result with 126 eligible publications was get, which were the basis of this study. There was a clear preference for case studies among the categories of research methods. Regarding the various phases of the ERP life cycle, implementation, operation, and decision were the most studied phases in the eligible publications. Implementation, integration approaches, user participation, decision making, and risks management were the top five concerns on ERP systems out of a list of twenty-two. These and other results were presented and discussed. Finally, main industry and academia contributions and some limitations were presented, and possible future works were proposed.Belfo, Fernando Paulo dos Santos RodriguesRepositório ComumMartins, Emanuel João da Silva2023-01-11T12:03:59Z20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/43128TID:203158105enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-01-19T02:17:12Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/43128Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:30:09.141681Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Major Concerns and Systematic literature Review on Enterprise Resource Planning
title Major Concerns and Systematic literature Review on Enterprise Resource Planning
spellingShingle Major Concerns and Systematic literature Review on Enterprise Resource Planning
Martins, Emanuel João da Silva
Enterprise resource planning
ERP
Literature analysis
ERP trends
ERP concerns
ERP evolution
Systematic literature review
PRISMA
title_short Major Concerns and Systematic literature Review on Enterprise Resource Planning
title_full Major Concerns and Systematic literature Review on Enterprise Resource Planning
title_fullStr Major Concerns and Systematic literature Review on Enterprise Resource Planning
title_full_unstemmed Major Concerns and Systematic literature Review on Enterprise Resource Planning
title_sort Major Concerns and Systematic literature Review on Enterprise Resource Planning
author Martins, Emanuel João da Silva
author_facet Martins, Emanuel João da Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Belfo, Fernando Paulo dos Santos Rodrigues
Repositório Comum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Emanuel João da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Enterprise resource planning
ERP
Literature analysis
ERP trends
ERP concerns
ERP evolution
Systematic literature review
PRISMA
topic Enterprise resource planning
ERP
Literature analysis
ERP trends
ERP concerns
ERP evolution
Systematic literature review
PRISMA
description Organizations seek to optimize their business processes and one of the best ways to achieve this goal is to implement an Enterprise Resource Planning system. ERP systems have evolved in recent decades with the aim of helping organizations improve the way they work and increase their performance. These systems have differentiated and flexible characteristics and can provide opportunities for growth and sustainability for large companies, but also for small and medium-sized companies. This dissertation addresses the major concerns on ERP systems through a systematic review of a decade of research (2011- 2021). Publications from the last decade addressed different themes and topics in different phases of ERP life cycle and used different study methodologies. Researchers have played a leading role in the study and understanding of ERP systems adopted in the most different contexts. The systematic review carried out was based on the structure and organization of PRISMA 2020, a document developed to facilitate the creation of systematic reviews and served as a methodological guide. Based on a systematic review, it was defined a taxonomy to characterize and categorize study methodologies, life cycle phases, and major concerns. The definition of a work methodology was important to guarantee a cohesive, solid, and sustainable work. The publications analysed in this research were obtained following the guidelines of the previously defined methodology and came from scientific repositories available at B-on, respectively, ACM, EBSCO, IEEE, SAGE, Scopus, Taylor & Francis, WoS. The first search phase obtained 2610 publications. After applying the eligibility criteria, a final result with 126 eligible publications was get, which were the basis of this study. There was a clear preference for case studies among the categories of research methods. Regarding the various phases of the ERP life cycle, implementation, operation, and decision were the most studied phases in the eligible publications. Implementation, integration approaches, user participation, decision making, and risks management were the top five concerns on ERP systems out of a list of twenty-two. These and other results were presented and discussed. Finally, main industry and academia contributions and some limitations were presented, and possible future works were proposed.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
2023-01-11T12:03:59Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/43128
TID:203158105
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/43128
identifier_str_mv TID:203158105
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130758336479232