Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Linhares, D
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Fonseca, JA, Ribeiro-da-Silva, M, Conceição, F, Sousa, A, Sousa-Pinto, B, Neves, N
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/152454
Resumo: Background: Microdiscectomy is the most commonly performed spine surgery and the first transitioning for outpatient settings. However, this transition was never studied, in what comes to cost-utility assessment. Accordingly, this economic study aims to access the cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy when compared with the inpatient procedure. Methods: This is a cost utility study, adopting the hospital perspective. Direct medical costs were retrieved from the assessment of 20 patients undergoing outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy and 20 undergoing inpatient lumbar microdiscectomy Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from Oswestry Disability Index values (ODI). ODI was prospectively assessed in outpatients in pre and 3- and 6-month post-operative evaluations. Inpatient ODI data were estimated from a meta-analysis. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated. Results: Outpatient procedure was cost-saving in all models tested. At 3-month assessment ICER ranged from €135,753 to €345,755/QALY, higher than the predefined threshold of €60,000/QALY gained. At 6-month costs were lower and utilities were higher in outpatient, overpowering the inpatient procedure. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that in 65% to 73% of simulations outpatient was the better option. The savings with outpatient were about 55% of inpatient values, with similar utility scores. No 30-day readmissions were recorded in either group. Conclusion: This is the first economic study on cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy, showing a significant reduction in costs, with a similar clinical outcome, proving it cost-effective.
id RCAP_464ea69a12b0d7ba9f1b63c13e734242
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/152454
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomyCost–Benefit AnalysisDiskectomyEconomicsIntervertebral Disc DisplacementOutpatientsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresBackground: Microdiscectomy is the most commonly performed spine surgery and the first transitioning for outpatient settings. However, this transition was never studied, in what comes to cost-utility assessment. Accordingly, this economic study aims to access the cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy when compared with the inpatient procedure. Methods: This is a cost utility study, adopting the hospital perspective. Direct medical costs were retrieved from the assessment of 20 patients undergoing outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy and 20 undergoing inpatient lumbar microdiscectomy Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from Oswestry Disability Index values (ODI). ODI was prospectively assessed in outpatients in pre and 3- and 6-month post-operative evaluations. Inpatient ODI data were estimated from a meta-analysis. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated. Results: Outpatient procedure was cost-saving in all models tested. At 3-month assessment ICER ranged from €135,753 to €345,755/QALY, higher than the predefined threshold of €60,000/QALY gained. At 6-month costs were lower and utilities were higher in outpatient, overpowering the inpatient procedure. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that in 65% to 73% of simulations outpatient was the better option. The savings with outpatient were about 55% of inpatient values, with similar utility scores. No 30-day readmissions were recorded in either group. Conclusion: This is the first economic study on cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy, showing a significant reduction in costs, with a similar clinical outcome, proving it cost-effective.BMC20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/152454eng1478-754710.1186/s12962-021-00272-wLinhares, DFonseca, JARibeiro-da-Silva, MConceição, FSousa, ASousa-Pinto, BNeves, Ninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-09-01T01:18:11ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy
title Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy
spellingShingle Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy
Linhares, D
Cost–Benefit Analysis
Diskectomy
Economics
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Outpatients
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
title_short Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy
title_full Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy
title_fullStr Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy
title_full_unstemmed Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy
title_sort Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy
author Linhares, D
author_facet Linhares, D
Fonseca, JA
Ribeiro-da-Silva, M
Conceição, F
Sousa, A
Sousa-Pinto, B
Neves, N
author_role author
author2 Fonseca, JA
Ribeiro-da-Silva, M
Conceição, F
Sousa, A
Sousa-Pinto, B
Neves, N
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Linhares, D
Fonseca, JA
Ribeiro-da-Silva, M
Conceição, F
Sousa, A
Sousa-Pinto, B
Neves, N
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cost–Benefit Analysis
Diskectomy
Economics
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Outpatients
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
topic Cost–Benefit Analysis
Diskectomy
Economics
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Outpatients
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
description Background: Microdiscectomy is the most commonly performed spine surgery and the first transitioning for outpatient settings. However, this transition was never studied, in what comes to cost-utility assessment. Accordingly, this economic study aims to access the cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy when compared with the inpatient procedure. Methods: This is a cost utility study, adopting the hospital perspective. Direct medical costs were retrieved from the assessment of 20 patients undergoing outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy and 20 undergoing inpatient lumbar microdiscectomy Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from Oswestry Disability Index values (ODI). ODI was prospectively assessed in outpatients in pre and 3- and 6-month post-operative evaluations. Inpatient ODI data were estimated from a meta-analysis. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated. Results: Outpatient procedure was cost-saving in all models tested. At 3-month assessment ICER ranged from €135,753 to €345,755/QALY, higher than the predefined threshold of €60,000/QALY gained. At 6-month costs were lower and utilities were higher in outpatient, overpowering the inpatient procedure. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that in 65% to 73% of simulations outpatient was the better option. The savings with outpatient were about 55% of inpatient values, with similar utility scores. No 30-day readmissions were recorded in either group. Conclusion: This is the first economic study on cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy, showing a significant reduction in costs, with a similar clinical outcome, proving it cost-effective.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/152454
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/152454
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1478-7547
10.1186/s12962-021-00272-w
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777304686020263936