Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa,Ana Rita
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Frutado,Inês, Gonçalves,João, Meireles,Mariana, Neves,João, Mateus,Andrea
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009
Resumo: Introduction: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is one of the most prevalent causes of observation in the emergency department in an ageing population. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has shown good results in critically ill with ARF. The evidence of NIPPV outcomes in old patients is scarce. The aim of our study is to analyse outcomes of NIPPV use in this population. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in a 12-bed intermediate care unit of an university hospital. We included and consecutively compared patients aged 75 years old or more (study group) and under 65 years old (control group) submitted to NIPPV due to ARF. The primary end point was mortality (in-hospital and 30 daysafter discharge). Secondary endpoints were NIPPV settings, complications, and failure rate. Results: A total of 109 patients were included. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the study group (22.2 % vs 8.1%, p< 0.01). However, mortality 30 days after discharge was not significantly different (4.1% vs 4.9%, p = 0.37). NIPPV duration of use (6.1 vs 2.2 days, p < 0.01) and hospital length of stay (14.3 vs 6.2 days, p = 0.01) were higher in the study group. NIPPV failure (22.2% vs 16.1 %, p = 0.09) and complication rate (intolerance 8% vs 6%, p = 0.31; ulcers 4% vs 3%, p = 0.28) were similar in both groups. Conclusion: ARF carries a grim prognosis in older adults. A high mortality rate was observed in older patients despite similar severity assessments and NIPPV failure and complication rates. Notably, out of the hospital mortality is comparable between both groups.
id RCAP_501afb4fb12f095e845983b64137d53d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0872-671X2020000300009
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?AgedAged, 80 and overNoninvasive VentilationRespiratory InsufficiencyTreatment FailureIntroduction: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is one of the most prevalent causes of observation in the emergency department in an ageing population. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has shown good results in critically ill with ARF. The evidence of NIPPV outcomes in old patients is scarce. The aim of our study is to analyse outcomes of NIPPV use in this population. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in a 12-bed intermediate care unit of an university hospital. We included and consecutively compared patients aged 75 years old or more (study group) and under 65 years old (control group) submitted to NIPPV due to ARF. The primary end point was mortality (in-hospital and 30 daysafter discharge). Secondary endpoints were NIPPV settings, complications, and failure rate. Results: A total of 109 patients were included. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the study group (22.2 % vs 8.1%, p< 0.01). However, mortality 30 days after discharge was not significantly different (4.1% vs 4.9%, p = 0.37). NIPPV duration of use (6.1 vs 2.2 days, p < 0.01) and hospital length of stay (14.3 vs 6.2 days, p = 0.01) were higher in the study group. NIPPV failure (22.2% vs 16.1 %, p = 0.09) and complication rate (intolerance 8% vs 6%, p = 0.31; ulcers 4% vs 3%, p = 0.28) were similar in both groups. Conclusion: ARF carries a grim prognosis in older adults. A high mortality rate was observed in older patients despite similar severity assessments and NIPPV failure and complication rates. Notably, out of the hospital mortality is comparable between both groups.Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna2020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009Medicina Interna v.27 n.2 2020reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009Costa,Ana RitaFrutado,InêsGonçalves,JoãoMeireles,MarianaNeves,JoãoMateus,Andreainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-27T12:24:01ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
title Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
spellingShingle Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
Costa,Ana Rita
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Noninvasive Ventilation
Respiratory Insufficiency
Treatment Failure
title_short Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
title_full Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
title_fullStr Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
title_full_unstemmed Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
title_sort Are Outcomes of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Similar in Very Old Adults?
author Costa,Ana Rita
author_facet Costa,Ana Rita
Frutado,Inês
Gonçalves,João
Meireles,Mariana
Neves,João
Mateus,Andrea
author_role author
author2 Frutado,Inês
Gonçalves,João
Meireles,Mariana
Neves,João
Mateus,Andrea
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa,Ana Rita
Frutado,Inês
Gonçalves,João
Meireles,Mariana
Neves,João
Mateus,Andrea
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Noninvasive Ventilation
Respiratory Insufficiency
Treatment Failure
topic Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Noninvasive Ventilation
Respiratory Insufficiency
Treatment Failure
description Introduction: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is one of the most prevalent causes of observation in the emergency department in an ageing population. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has shown good results in critically ill with ARF. The evidence of NIPPV outcomes in old patients is scarce. The aim of our study is to analyse outcomes of NIPPV use in this population. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in a 12-bed intermediate care unit of an university hospital. We included and consecutively compared patients aged 75 years old or more (study group) and under 65 years old (control group) submitted to NIPPV due to ARF. The primary end point was mortality (in-hospital and 30 daysafter discharge). Secondary endpoints were NIPPV settings, complications, and failure rate. Results: A total of 109 patients were included. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the study group (22.2 % vs 8.1%, p< 0.01). However, mortality 30 days after discharge was not significantly different (4.1% vs 4.9%, p = 0.37). NIPPV duration of use (6.1 vs 2.2 days, p < 0.01) and hospital length of stay (14.3 vs 6.2 days, p = 0.01) were higher in the study group. NIPPV failure (22.2% vs 16.1 %, p = 0.09) and complication rate (intolerance 8% vs 6%, p = 0.31; ulcers 4% vs 3%, p = 0.28) were similar in both groups. Conclusion: ARF carries a grim prognosis in older adults. A high mortality rate was observed in older patients despite similar severity assessments and NIPPV failure and complication rates. Notably, out of the hospital mortality is comparable between both groups.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2020000300009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Medicina Interna v.27 n.2 2020
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777304410361167872