Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Eliseu, Miguel
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Marques, Vera, Antunes, Hugo, Lourenço, Mário, Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar, Temido, Paulo, Figueiredo, Arnaldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147
Resumo: Introduction: Non-muscle invasive (NMI) bladder cancers (BC) account for 75% of BC cases, and most are initially diagnosed and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB). After primary TURB, a repeat resection (rTURB) should be carried out in cases of incomplete resection; however, rTURB is recommended by EAU guidelines in pT1 tumors even when the completeness of the original resection is believed by the surgeon, with reported rates of residual tumor in up to 33%-55% and upstaging in up to 25%. Since the quality of initial resection impacts in the result of a rTURB, these rates are largely dependent on the primary treatment and accurate prediction of completeness, with a probable high variability between surgeons and Centres. Our objectives to determine whether rTURB after initial perceived complete resection would frequently identify residual tumor and if this procedure would improve outcomes in NMIBC patients. Methods: Patients submitted to TURB from 2015 to 2017 were analysed, identifying which underwent rTURB after initial resection without follow-up cystoscopy in between. Primary perception of completeness, stage and grade were correlated with the eventual presence, stage and grade of residual tumor. Results: We analyzed 546 TURB procedures; of these, 275 (50.4%) were for primary bladder cancer. pT1 lesions were found in 85 (30.9%) of primary TURBs; 12 of these were selected for rTURB due to incomplete resection. Of the remaining 73 macros- copically completely resected primary pT1 tumors, 26 (30.6%) underwent elective rTURB. Repeat TURB after complete resection of primary pT1 tumors yielded residual tumor in 11.5% of patients (n= 3). All patients with residual tumor had primary pT1 high grade lesions; no upstaging or upgrading was observed. Patients had similar recurrence rates at 1-year regardless of rTURB. Discussion/Conclusion: Standard practice in primary TURB pro- cedures varies across surgeons and centers and will reflect on residual tumor rates. Indications for rTURB might not be suitable for all patients, and single Centre results should be taken in consideration when selecting patients for rTURB.
id RCAP_510185d4dfd58ae59f8a2ed3e2afd36e
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/147
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary ResectionResultado de Segunda Ressecção Transuretral de Neoplasia Vesical Após Ressecção Primária Macroscopicamente CompletaNeoplasm Recurrence, Local ReoperationUrinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgeryNeoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgiaRecidiva Local de NeoplasiaReoperaçãoIntroduction: Non-muscle invasive (NMI) bladder cancers (BC) account for 75% of BC cases, and most are initially diagnosed and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB). After primary TURB, a repeat resection (rTURB) should be carried out in cases of incomplete resection; however, rTURB is recommended by EAU guidelines in pT1 tumors even when the completeness of the original resection is believed by the surgeon, with reported rates of residual tumor in up to 33%-55% and upstaging in up to 25%. Since the quality of initial resection impacts in the result of a rTURB, these rates are largely dependent on the primary treatment and accurate prediction of completeness, with a probable high variability between surgeons and Centres. Our objectives to determine whether rTURB after initial perceived complete resection would frequently identify residual tumor and if this procedure would improve outcomes in NMIBC patients. Methods: Patients submitted to TURB from 2015 to 2017 were analysed, identifying which underwent rTURB after initial resection without follow-up cystoscopy in between. Primary perception of completeness, stage and grade were correlated with the eventual presence, stage and grade of residual tumor. Results: We analyzed 546 TURB procedures; of these, 275 (50.4%) were for primary bladder cancer. pT1 lesions were found in 85 (30.9%) of primary TURBs; 12 of these were selected for rTURB due to incomplete resection. Of the remaining 73 macros- copically completely resected primary pT1 tumors, 26 (30.6%) underwent elective rTURB. Repeat TURB after complete resection of primary pT1 tumors yielded residual tumor in 11.5% of patients (n= 3). All patients with residual tumor had primary pT1 high grade lesions; no upstaging or upgrading was observed. Patients had similar recurrence rates at 1-year regardless of rTURB. Discussion/Conclusion: Standard practice in primary TURB pro- cedures varies across surgeons and centers and will reflect on residual tumor rates. Indications for rTURB might not be suitable for all patients, and single Centre results should be taken in consideration when selecting patients for rTURB.Introdução: O cancro da bexiga não músculo-invasivo corres- ponde a 75% dos casos de cancro da bexiga, sendo que a maioria são inicialmente diagnosticados e tratados com ressecção transuretral (RTU). Depois de uma RTU primária macroscopicamente incompleta, uma segunda ressecção (reRTU); no entanto, a reRTU é recomendada pelas linhas de orientação da EAU mesmo quando a ressecção inicial é macroscopicamente completa, com taxas de neoplasia residual entre 33%-55% e upstaging em até 25% dos casos. Dado que a qualidade da RTU primária tem impacto significativo no resultado anatomopatológico de uma reRTU, estas taxas são largamente dependentes do tratamento primário e da acuidade de determinação intraopera- tória de ressecção macroscopicamente completa, com uma provável variabilidade grande entre Centros e cirurgiões. Os objectivos foram averiguar se a reRTU após RTU primária macroscopicamente completa mostraria taxas de neoplasia residual significativas e se a realização deste procedimento melhoraria os resultados do tratamento do cancro da bexiga não músculo-invasivo. Métodos: Doentes submetidos a RTU entre 2015 e 2017 foram analisados, identificando quais realizaram reRTU planeada sem controlo cistoscópico entre as intervenções. Foi realizada correlação da percepção de RTU primária completa, estadio e grau com a presença, estadio e grau de neoplasia residual. Resultados: Foram analisadas 546 RTUs; destas, 275 (50,4%) foram por neoplasia primária. Oitenta cinco doentes (30,9%) ti- nham pT1; destes, 12 foram seleccionados para reRTU por ressecção incompleta. Dos restantes 73 casos de pT1 primário com ressecção completa, 26 (30,6%) foram submetidos a reRTU. A reRTU após ressecção completa de pT1 primário mostrou neoplasia residual em 11,5% dos doentes (n=3). Todos os doentes com tumor residual tinham neoplasia primária de alto grau; não se verificou upstaging ou upgrading. A taxa de recorrência ao 1o ano foi semelhante nos doentes submetidos ou não a reRTU. Discussão / Conclusão: Os padrões de técnica e profundidade de RTU variam entre Centros e cirurgiões, e vão invariavelmente reflectir-se na taxa de neoplasia residual. A reRTU pode não ser benéfica para todos os casos, e dados de cada centro devem ser considerados na selecção.Associação Portuguesa de Urologia2022-01-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 37 No. 1-2 (2020): January - June; 7-11Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 37 n. 1-2 (2020): Janeiro - Junho; 7-112387-04192341-4022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/147http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/147/61Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Association of Urologyhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEliseu, MiguelMarques, VeraAntunes, HugoLourenço, MárioTavares-da-Silva, EdgarTemido, PauloFigueiredo, Arnaldo2023-04-09T06:45:07Zoai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/147Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:55:55.163647Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection
Resultado de Segunda Ressecção Transuretral de Neoplasia Vesical Após Ressecção Primária Macroscopicamente Completa
title Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection
spellingShingle Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection
Eliseu, Miguel
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Reoperation
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia
Reoperação
title_short Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection
title_full Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection
title_fullStr Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection
title_full_unstemmed Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection
title_sort Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection
author Eliseu, Miguel
author_facet Eliseu, Miguel
Marques, Vera
Antunes, Hugo
Lourenço, Mário
Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar
Temido, Paulo
Figueiredo, Arnaldo
author_role author
author2 Marques, Vera
Antunes, Hugo
Lourenço, Mário
Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar
Temido, Paulo
Figueiredo, Arnaldo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Eliseu, Miguel
Marques, Vera
Antunes, Hugo
Lourenço, Mário
Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar
Temido, Paulo
Figueiredo, Arnaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Reoperation
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia
Reoperação
topic Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Reoperation
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia
Reoperação
description Introduction: Non-muscle invasive (NMI) bladder cancers (BC) account for 75% of BC cases, and most are initially diagnosed and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB). After primary TURB, a repeat resection (rTURB) should be carried out in cases of incomplete resection; however, rTURB is recommended by EAU guidelines in pT1 tumors even when the completeness of the original resection is believed by the surgeon, with reported rates of residual tumor in up to 33%-55% and upstaging in up to 25%. Since the quality of initial resection impacts in the result of a rTURB, these rates are largely dependent on the primary treatment and accurate prediction of completeness, with a probable high variability between surgeons and Centres. Our objectives to determine whether rTURB after initial perceived complete resection would frequently identify residual tumor and if this procedure would improve outcomes in NMIBC patients. Methods: Patients submitted to TURB from 2015 to 2017 were analysed, identifying which underwent rTURB after initial resection without follow-up cystoscopy in between. Primary perception of completeness, stage and grade were correlated with the eventual presence, stage and grade of residual tumor. Results: We analyzed 546 TURB procedures; of these, 275 (50.4%) were for primary bladder cancer. pT1 lesions were found in 85 (30.9%) of primary TURBs; 12 of these were selected for rTURB due to incomplete resection. Of the remaining 73 macros- copically completely resected primary pT1 tumors, 26 (30.6%) underwent elective rTURB. Repeat TURB after complete resection of primary pT1 tumors yielded residual tumor in 11.5% of patients (n= 3). All patients with residual tumor had primary pT1 high grade lesions; no upstaging or upgrading was observed. Patients had similar recurrence rates at 1-year regardless of rTURB. Discussion/Conclusion: Standard practice in primary TURB pro- cedures varies across surgeons and centers and will reflect on residual tumor rates. Indications for rTURB might not be suitable for all patients, and single Centre results should be taken in consideration when selecting patients for rTURB.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147
url https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/147
http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/147/61
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Association of Urology
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Association of Urology
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 37 No. 1-2 (2020): January - June; 7-11
Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 37 n. 1-2 (2020): Janeiro - Junho; 7-11
2387-0419
2341-4022
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130427755069440