Accuracy of the new Icare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garcia-Resua, C.
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: González-Méijome, José Manuel, Gilino, J., Yebra-Pimentel Vilar, Eva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/5795
Resumo: PURPOSE: The ICare (Tiolat Oy, Helsinki, Finland) is a new portable tonometer that measures intraocular pressure (IOP) with a new rebound method, in which a very light probe is used to make momentary contact with the cornea in slow motion. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of the ICare IOP measurements by comparing them against other portable tonometers: Perkins applanation tonometer and Tono-Pen XL digital tonometer (Medtronic Solan, Jacksonville, FL). METHODS: Sixty-five young subjects were assessed with each of the tonometers. ICare tonometry was performed first, followed by Perkins applanation tonometry and Tono-Pen XL in a random order. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the Perkins tonometer and the remaining tonometers used in this study. Tonometers were also compared by plotting the difference between the methods against the mean. The hypothesis of zero bias was examined by a paired t test and the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated. RESULTS: ICare and Tono-Pen XL significantly overestimate IOP when compared with Perkins applanation tonometry. The mean of the difference between Perkins and ICare and Perkins and Tono-Pen XL was (mean +/- standard deviation) -3.35 +/- 2.28 mm Hg and -2.78 +/- 2.53 mm Hg, respectively. The 95% LoA between Perkins tonometry and ICare tonometry were between -7.81 and +1.12 and between Perkins tonometry and Tono-Pen XL tonometry between -7.74 and +2.18. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with Perkins tonometry, the ICare tonometer allows clinicians to estimate IOP with a portable, rapid, and noninvasive method with similar reliability to that offered by Tono-Pen XL. Clinicians should be aware of the systematic overestimation of IOP with the ICare. Further research is needed to evaluate the performance of rebound tonometry in populations with higher IOP and assess the reliability of this technique in the early detection and follow up of glaucomatous patients.
id RCAP_5117b47fa31879964716fee1c890aec9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/5795
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Accuracy of the new Icare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyesIntraocular pressurePerkins tonometryRebound tonometryIcareTono-Pen XLPortable tonometersAccuracyScience & TechnologyPURPOSE: The ICare (Tiolat Oy, Helsinki, Finland) is a new portable tonometer that measures intraocular pressure (IOP) with a new rebound method, in which a very light probe is used to make momentary contact with the cornea in slow motion. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of the ICare IOP measurements by comparing them against other portable tonometers: Perkins applanation tonometer and Tono-Pen XL digital tonometer (Medtronic Solan, Jacksonville, FL). METHODS: Sixty-five young subjects were assessed with each of the tonometers. ICare tonometry was performed first, followed by Perkins applanation tonometry and Tono-Pen XL in a random order. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the Perkins tonometer and the remaining tonometers used in this study. Tonometers were also compared by plotting the difference between the methods against the mean. The hypothesis of zero bias was examined by a paired t test and the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated. RESULTS: ICare and Tono-Pen XL significantly overestimate IOP when compared with Perkins applanation tonometry. The mean of the difference between Perkins and ICare and Perkins and Tono-Pen XL was (mean +/- standard deviation) -3.35 +/- 2.28 mm Hg and -2.78 +/- 2.53 mm Hg, respectively. The 95% LoA between Perkins tonometry and ICare tonometry were between -7.81 and +1.12 and between Perkins tonometry and Tono-Pen XL tonometry between -7.74 and +2.18. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with Perkins tonometry, the ICare tonometer allows clinicians to estimate IOP with a portable, rapid, and noninvasive method with similar reliability to that offered by Tono-Pen XL. Clinicians should be aware of the systematic overestimation of IOP with the ICare. Further research is needed to evaluate the performance of rebound tonometry in populations with higher IOP and assess the reliability of this technique in the early detection and follow up of glaucomatous patients.Lippincott, Williams & WilkinsUniversidade do MinhoGarcia-Resua, C.González-Méijome, José ManuelGilino, J.Yebra-Pimentel Vilar, Eva2006-022006-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/5795eng"Optometry and vision science". ISSN 0146-0404. 83:2 (Febr. 2006) 102-107.0146-040410.1097/01.opx.0000200673.96758.7b16501412info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:16:22Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/5795Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:08:53.640041Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Accuracy of the new Icare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes
title Accuracy of the new Icare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes
spellingShingle Accuracy of the new Icare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes
Garcia-Resua, C.
Intraocular pressure
Perkins tonometry
Rebound tonometry
Icare
Tono-Pen XL
Portable tonometers
Accuracy
Science & Technology
title_short Accuracy of the new Icare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes
title_full Accuracy of the new Icare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes
title_fullStr Accuracy of the new Icare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of the new Icare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes
title_sort Accuracy of the new Icare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes
author Garcia-Resua, C.
author_facet Garcia-Resua, C.
González-Méijome, José Manuel
Gilino, J.
Yebra-Pimentel Vilar, Eva
author_role author
author2 González-Méijome, José Manuel
Gilino, J.
Yebra-Pimentel Vilar, Eva
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garcia-Resua, C.
González-Méijome, José Manuel
Gilino, J.
Yebra-Pimentel Vilar, Eva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intraocular pressure
Perkins tonometry
Rebound tonometry
Icare
Tono-Pen XL
Portable tonometers
Accuracy
Science & Technology
topic Intraocular pressure
Perkins tonometry
Rebound tonometry
Icare
Tono-Pen XL
Portable tonometers
Accuracy
Science & Technology
description PURPOSE: The ICare (Tiolat Oy, Helsinki, Finland) is a new portable tonometer that measures intraocular pressure (IOP) with a new rebound method, in which a very light probe is used to make momentary contact with the cornea in slow motion. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of the ICare IOP measurements by comparing them against other portable tonometers: Perkins applanation tonometer and Tono-Pen XL digital tonometer (Medtronic Solan, Jacksonville, FL). METHODS: Sixty-five young subjects were assessed with each of the tonometers. ICare tonometry was performed first, followed by Perkins applanation tonometry and Tono-Pen XL in a random order. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the Perkins tonometer and the remaining tonometers used in this study. Tonometers were also compared by plotting the difference between the methods against the mean. The hypothesis of zero bias was examined by a paired t test and the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated. RESULTS: ICare and Tono-Pen XL significantly overestimate IOP when compared with Perkins applanation tonometry. The mean of the difference between Perkins and ICare and Perkins and Tono-Pen XL was (mean +/- standard deviation) -3.35 +/- 2.28 mm Hg and -2.78 +/- 2.53 mm Hg, respectively. The 95% LoA between Perkins tonometry and ICare tonometry were between -7.81 and +1.12 and between Perkins tonometry and Tono-Pen XL tonometry between -7.74 and +2.18. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with Perkins tonometry, the ICare tonometer allows clinicians to estimate IOP with a portable, rapid, and noninvasive method with similar reliability to that offered by Tono-Pen XL. Clinicians should be aware of the systematic overestimation of IOP with the ICare. Further research is needed to evaluate the performance of rebound tonometry in populations with higher IOP and assess the reliability of this technique in the early detection and follow up of glaucomatous patients.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-02
2006-02-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/5795
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/5795
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv "Optometry and vision science". ISSN 0146-0404. 83:2 (Febr. 2006) 102-107.
0146-0404
10.1097/01.opx.0000200673.96758.7b
16501412
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132512890388480