Contribution of Different Patient Information Sources to Create the Best Possible Medication History

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Joelizy
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Cabral, Ana Cristina, Lavrador, Marta, Costa, Filipa A., Almeida, Filipe Félix, Macedo, António, Saraiva, Carlos, Castel-Branco, Margarida, Caramona, Margarida, Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando, Figueiredo, Isabel Vitória
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082
Resumo: Introduction: Obtaining the best possible medication history is the crucial step in medication reconciliation. Our aim was to evaluate the potential contributions of the main data sources available – patient/caregiver, hospital medical records, and shared electronic health records – to obtain an accurate ‘best possible medication history’.Material and Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted. Adult patients taking at least one medicine were included. Patient interview was performed upon admission and this information was reconciled with hospital medical records and shared electronic health records, assessed retrospectively. Concordance between sources was assessed. In the shared electronic health records, information was collected for four time-periods: the preceding three, six, nine and 12-months. The proportion of omitted data between time-periods was analysed.Results: A total of 148 patients were admitted, with a mean age of 54.6 ± 16.3 years. A total of 1639 medicines were retrieved. Only 29% were collected simultaneously in the three sources of information, 40% were only obtained in shared electronic health records and only 5% were obtained exclusively from patients. The total number of medicines gathered in shared electronic health records considering the different time frames were 778 (three-months), 1397 (six-months), 1748 (nine-months), and 1933 (12-months).Discussion: The use of shared electronic health records provides data that were omitted in the other data sources available and retrieving the information at six months is the most efficient procedure to establish the basis of the best possible medication history.Conclusion: Shared electronic health records should be the preferred source of information to supplement the patient or caregiver interview in order to increase the accuracy of best possible medication history of the patient, particularly if collected within the prior six months.
id RCAP_51df2fe54852545069b43591d45cb614
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/12082
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Contribution of Different Patient Information Sources to Create the Best Possible Medication HistoryContribuição de Diferentes Fontes de Informação para Obter a Melhor História Farmacoterapêutica PossívelElectronic Health RecordsMedical History TakingMedication ReconciliationAnamneseReconciliação de MedicamentosRegistos Eletrónicos em SaúdeIntroduction: Obtaining the best possible medication history is the crucial step in medication reconciliation. Our aim was to evaluate the potential contributions of the main data sources available – patient/caregiver, hospital medical records, and shared electronic health records – to obtain an accurate ‘best possible medication history’.Material and Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted. Adult patients taking at least one medicine were included. Patient interview was performed upon admission and this information was reconciled with hospital medical records and shared electronic health records, assessed retrospectively. Concordance between sources was assessed. In the shared electronic health records, information was collected for four time-periods: the preceding three, six, nine and 12-months. The proportion of omitted data between time-periods was analysed.Results: A total of 148 patients were admitted, with a mean age of 54.6 ± 16.3 years. A total of 1639 medicines were retrieved. Only 29% were collected simultaneously in the three sources of information, 40% were only obtained in shared electronic health records and only 5% were obtained exclusively from patients. The total number of medicines gathered in shared electronic health records considering the different time frames were 778 (three-months), 1397 (six-months), 1748 (nine-months), and 1933 (12-months).Discussion: The use of shared electronic health records provides data that were omitted in the other data sources available and retrieving the information at six months is the most efficient procedure to establish the basis of the best possible medication history.Conclusion: Shared electronic health records should be the preferred source of information to supplement the patient or caregiver interview in order to increase the accuracy of best possible medication history of the patient, particularly if collected within the prior six months.Introdução: A obtenção da melhor história farmacoterapêutica possível é uma etapa crucial da reconciliação da medicação. O objetivo foi avaliar as potenciais contribuições das principais fontes de informação disponíveis – doente/cuidador, Processo Único, Plataforma de Dados da Saúde e – para obter uma mais exacta melhor história farmacoterapêutica possível.Material e Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo transversal observacional. Incluíram-se doentes adultos a tomar pelo menos um medicamento. A entrevista com o doente foi realizada na admissão e os dados do Processo Único e da Plataforma de Dados da Saúde recolhidos retrospetivamente. A concordância entre as fontes de informação foi avaliada. Na plataforma de dados da saúde, os dados foram recolhidos em quatro janelas temporais: os últimos três, seis, nove e 12- meses. Os dados omitidos entre os diferentes tempos foram analisados.Resultados: Participaram 148 doentes, com uma idade média de 54,6 ± 16,3 anos. Foram recolhidos 1639 medicamentos. Destes, 29% foram obtidos simultaneamente nas três fontes de informação, 40% foram obtidos apenas na Plataforma de Dados da Saúde e 5% foram obtidos exclusivamente a partir do doente. O número total de fármacos recolhidos na Plataforma de Dados da Saúde nos diferentes tempos foi 778 (três meses), 1397 (seis meses), 1748 (nove meses) e 1933 (12 meses).Discussão: A consulta da Plataforma de Dados da Saúde permite obter dados omitidos nas outras fontes de informação e a recolha dos seis meses precedentes é o procedimento mais eficiente para constituir a base da melhor história farmacoterapêutica possível.Conclusão: A Plataforma de Dados da Saúde deve ser a fonte de informação preferencial para complementar a entrevista do doente/cuidador de forma a aumentar a exatidão da melhor história farmacoterapêutica possível, particularmente se a informação for recolhida em relação aos seis meses precedentes.Ordem dos Médicos2020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/12082Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 33 No. 6 (2020): June; 384-389Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 33 N.º 6 (2020): Junho; 384-3891646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082/5972https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082/11292https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082/11415https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082/11416Direitos de Autor (c) 2020 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, JoelizyCabral, Ana CristinaLavrador, MartaCosta, Filipa A.Almeida, Filipe FélixMacedo, AntónioSaraiva, CarlosCastel-Branco, MargaridaCaramona, MargaridaFernandez-Llimos, FernandoFigueiredo, Isabel Vitória2022-12-20T11:06:30Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/12082Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:08.326328Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Contribution of Different Patient Information Sources to Create the Best Possible Medication History
Contribuição de Diferentes Fontes de Informação para Obter a Melhor História Farmacoterapêutica Possível
title Contribution of Different Patient Information Sources to Create the Best Possible Medication History
spellingShingle Contribution of Different Patient Information Sources to Create the Best Possible Medication History
Oliveira, Joelizy
Electronic Health Records
Medical History Taking
Medication Reconciliation
Anamnese
Reconciliação de Medicamentos
Registos Eletrónicos em Saúde
title_short Contribution of Different Patient Information Sources to Create the Best Possible Medication History
title_full Contribution of Different Patient Information Sources to Create the Best Possible Medication History
title_fullStr Contribution of Different Patient Information Sources to Create the Best Possible Medication History
title_full_unstemmed Contribution of Different Patient Information Sources to Create the Best Possible Medication History
title_sort Contribution of Different Patient Information Sources to Create the Best Possible Medication History
author Oliveira, Joelizy
author_facet Oliveira, Joelizy
Cabral, Ana Cristina
Lavrador, Marta
Costa, Filipa A.
Almeida, Filipe Félix
Macedo, António
Saraiva, Carlos
Castel-Branco, Margarida
Caramona, Margarida
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Figueiredo, Isabel Vitória
author_role author
author2 Cabral, Ana Cristina
Lavrador, Marta
Costa, Filipa A.
Almeida, Filipe Félix
Macedo, António
Saraiva, Carlos
Castel-Branco, Margarida
Caramona, Margarida
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Figueiredo, Isabel Vitória
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Joelizy
Cabral, Ana Cristina
Lavrador, Marta
Costa, Filipa A.
Almeida, Filipe Félix
Macedo, António
Saraiva, Carlos
Castel-Branco, Margarida
Caramona, Margarida
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Figueiredo, Isabel Vitória
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Electronic Health Records
Medical History Taking
Medication Reconciliation
Anamnese
Reconciliação de Medicamentos
Registos Eletrónicos em Saúde
topic Electronic Health Records
Medical History Taking
Medication Reconciliation
Anamnese
Reconciliação de Medicamentos
Registos Eletrónicos em Saúde
description Introduction: Obtaining the best possible medication history is the crucial step in medication reconciliation. Our aim was to evaluate the potential contributions of the main data sources available – patient/caregiver, hospital medical records, and shared electronic health records – to obtain an accurate ‘best possible medication history’.Material and Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted. Adult patients taking at least one medicine were included. Patient interview was performed upon admission and this information was reconciled with hospital medical records and shared electronic health records, assessed retrospectively. Concordance between sources was assessed. In the shared electronic health records, information was collected for four time-periods: the preceding three, six, nine and 12-months. The proportion of omitted data between time-periods was analysed.Results: A total of 148 patients were admitted, with a mean age of 54.6 ± 16.3 years. A total of 1639 medicines were retrieved. Only 29% were collected simultaneously in the three sources of information, 40% were only obtained in shared electronic health records and only 5% were obtained exclusively from patients. The total number of medicines gathered in shared electronic health records considering the different time frames were 778 (three-months), 1397 (six-months), 1748 (nine-months), and 1933 (12-months).Discussion: The use of shared electronic health records provides data that were omitted in the other data sources available and retrieving the information at six months is the most efficient procedure to establish the basis of the best possible medication history.Conclusion: Shared electronic health records should be the preferred source of information to supplement the patient or caregiver interview in order to increase the accuracy of best possible medication history of the patient, particularly if collected within the prior six months.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/12082
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/12082
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082/5972
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082/11292
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082/11415
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12082/11416
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2020 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2020 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 33 No. 6 (2020): June; 384-389
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 33 N.º 6 (2020): Junho; 384-389
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130650264993792