Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinho, Rolando
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Saraiva, Miguel Mascarenhas, Mão-de-Ferro, Susana, Ferreira, Sara, Almeida, Nuno, Figueiredo, Pedro, Rodrigues, Adélia, Cardoso, Hélder, Marques, Margarida, Cotter, José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47056
Resumo: Background: Device-assisted enteroscopies (DAEs) are recent endoscopic techniques that enable direct endoscopic smallbowel evaluation. Objective: The objective of this article is to evaluate the implementation of DAEs in Portugal and assess the main indications, diagnoses, diagnostic yield, therapeutic yield and complication rate. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective series using a national Web-based survey on behalf of the Portuguese Small-Bowel Study Group. Participants were asked to fill out two online databases regarding procedural data, indications, diagnoses, endoscopic therapy and complications using prospectively collected institutional data records. Results: A total of eight centers were enrolled in the survey, corresponding to 1411 DAEs. The most frequent indications were obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), inflammatory bowel disease and small-bowel tumors. The pooled diagnostic yield was 63%. A relation between the diagnostic yield and the indications was clear, with a diagnostic yield for OGIB of 69% (p ¼ 0.02) with a 52% therapeutic yield. Complications occurred in 1.2%, with a major complication rate of 0.57%. Perforations occurred in four patients (0.28%). Conclusion: DAEs are safe and effective procedures, with complication rates of 1.2%, the most serious of which is perforation. Most procedures are performed in the setting of OGIB. Diagnostic and therapeutic yields are dependent on the indication, hence appropriate patient selection is crucial.
id RCAP_5bc3b7e2f5994fe64d25216723a258a6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/47056
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in PortugalEnteroscopyDouble-balloon enteroscopySingle-balloon enteroscopySpiral enteroscopySmall-bowelSurveyDiagnosisTherapyComplicationsScience & TechnologyBackground: Device-assisted enteroscopies (DAEs) are recent endoscopic techniques that enable direct endoscopic smallbowel evaluation. Objective: The objective of this article is to evaluate the implementation of DAEs in Portugal and assess the main indications, diagnoses, diagnostic yield, therapeutic yield and complication rate. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective series using a national Web-based survey on behalf of the Portuguese Small-Bowel Study Group. Participants were asked to fill out two online databases regarding procedural data, indications, diagnoses, endoscopic therapy and complications using prospectively collected institutional data records. Results: A total of eight centers were enrolled in the survey, corresponding to 1411 DAEs. The most frequent indications were obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), inflammatory bowel disease and small-bowel tumors. The pooled diagnostic yield was 63%. A relation between the diagnostic yield and the indications was clear, with a diagnostic yield for OGIB of 69% (p ¼ 0.02) with a 52% therapeutic yield. Complications occurred in 1.2%, with a major complication rate of 0.57%. Perforations occurred in four patients (0.28%). Conclusion: DAEs are safe and effective procedures, with complication rates of 1.2%, the most serious of which is perforation. Most procedures are performed in the setting of OGIB. Diagnostic and therapeutic yields are dependent on the indication, hence appropriate patient selection is crucial.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionSAGE[et al.]Universidade do MinhoPinho, RolandoSaraiva, Miguel MascarenhasMão-de-Ferro, SusanaFerreira, SaraAlmeida, NunoFigueiredo, PedroRodrigues, AdéliaCardoso, HélderMarques, MargaridaCotter, José20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/47056eng2050-64062050-641410.1177/2050640615604775http://journals.sagepub.com/home/ueginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:43:21Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/47056Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:40:48.984826Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal
title Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal
spellingShingle Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal
Pinho, Rolando
Enteroscopy
Double-balloon enteroscopy
Single-balloon enteroscopy
Spiral enteroscopy
Small-bowel
Survey
Diagnosis
Therapy
Complications
Science & Technology
title_short Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal
title_full Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal
title_fullStr Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal
title_sort Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal
author Pinho, Rolando
author_facet Pinho, Rolando
Saraiva, Miguel Mascarenhas
Mão-de-Ferro, Susana
Ferreira, Sara
Almeida, Nuno
Figueiredo, Pedro
Rodrigues, Adélia
Cardoso, Hélder
Marques, Margarida
Cotter, José
author_role author
author2 Saraiva, Miguel Mascarenhas
Mão-de-Ferro, Susana
Ferreira, Sara
Almeida, Nuno
Figueiredo, Pedro
Rodrigues, Adélia
Cardoso, Hélder
Marques, Margarida
Cotter, José
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv [et al.]
Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinho, Rolando
Saraiva, Miguel Mascarenhas
Mão-de-Ferro, Susana
Ferreira, Sara
Almeida, Nuno
Figueiredo, Pedro
Rodrigues, Adélia
Cardoso, Hélder
Marques, Margarida
Cotter, José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Enteroscopy
Double-balloon enteroscopy
Single-balloon enteroscopy
Spiral enteroscopy
Small-bowel
Survey
Diagnosis
Therapy
Complications
Science & Technology
topic Enteroscopy
Double-balloon enteroscopy
Single-balloon enteroscopy
Spiral enteroscopy
Small-bowel
Survey
Diagnosis
Therapy
Complications
Science & Technology
description Background: Device-assisted enteroscopies (DAEs) are recent endoscopic techniques that enable direct endoscopic smallbowel evaluation. Objective: The objective of this article is to evaluate the implementation of DAEs in Portugal and assess the main indications, diagnoses, diagnostic yield, therapeutic yield and complication rate. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective series using a national Web-based survey on behalf of the Portuguese Small-Bowel Study Group. Participants were asked to fill out two online databases regarding procedural data, indications, diagnoses, endoscopic therapy and complications using prospectively collected institutional data records. Results: A total of eight centers were enrolled in the survey, corresponding to 1411 DAEs. The most frequent indications were obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), inflammatory bowel disease and small-bowel tumors. The pooled diagnostic yield was 63%. A relation between the diagnostic yield and the indications was clear, with a diagnostic yield for OGIB of 69% (p ¼ 0.02) with a 52% therapeutic yield. Complications occurred in 1.2%, with a major complication rate of 0.57%. Perforations occurred in four patients (0.28%). Conclusion: DAEs are safe and effective procedures, with complication rates of 1.2%, the most serious of which is perforation. Most procedures are performed in the setting of OGIB. Diagnostic and therapeutic yields are dependent on the indication, hence appropriate patient selection is crucial.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47056
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47056
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2050-6406
2050-6414
10.1177/2050640615604775
http://journals.sagepub.com/home/ueg
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132954353467392