Measurement rounding errors in an assessment model of project led Engineering Education

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moreira, Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Sousa, Rui M., Leão, Celina Pinto, Alves, Anabela Carvalho, Lima, Rui M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/18307
Resumo: This paper analyzes the rounding errors that occur in the assessment of an interdisciplinary Project-Led Education (PLE) process implemented in the Integrated Master degree on Industrial Management and Engineering (IME) at University of Minho. PLE is an innovative educational methodology which makes use of active learning, promoting higher levels of motivation and students’ autonomy. The assessment model is based on multiple evaluation components with different weights. Each component can be evaluated by several teachers involved in different Project Supporting Courses (PSC). This model can be affected by different types of errors, namely: (1) rounding errors, and (2) non-uniform criteria of rounding the grades. A rigorous analysis of the assessment model was made and the rounding errors involved on each project component were characterized and measured. This resulted in a global maximum error of 0.308 on the individual student project grade, in a 0 to 100 scale. This analysis intended to improve not only the reliability of the assessment results, but also teachers’ awareness of this problem. Recommendations are also made in order to improve the assessment model and reduce the rounding errors as much as possible.
id RCAP_6de70cc5beeabfa75038112d02c5d283
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/18307
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Measurement rounding errors in an assessment model of project led Engineering EducationActive learningAssessmentProject-led educationRounding errorsScience & TechnologyThis paper analyzes the rounding errors that occur in the assessment of an interdisciplinary Project-Led Education (PLE) process implemented in the Integrated Master degree on Industrial Management and Engineering (IME) at University of Minho. PLE is an innovative educational methodology which makes use of active learning, promoting higher levels of motivation and students’ autonomy. The assessment model is based on multiple evaluation components with different weights. Each component can be evaluated by several teachers involved in different Project Supporting Courses (PSC). This model can be affected by different types of errors, namely: (1) rounding errors, and (2) non-uniform criteria of rounding the grades. A rigorous analysis of the assessment model was made and the rounding errors involved on each project component were characterized and measured. This resulted in a global maximum error of 0.308 on the individual student project grade, in a 0 to 100 scale. This analysis intended to improve not only the reliability of the assessment results, but also teachers’ awareness of this problem. Recommendations are also made in order to improve the assessment model and reduce the rounding errors as much as possible.International Association of Online EngineeringUniversidade do MinhoMoreira, FranciscoSousa, Rui M.Leão, Celina PintoAlves, Anabela CarvalhoLima, Rui M.20092009-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/18307eng1868-16461861-212110.3991/ijoe.v5s2.1092info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:21:04ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Measurement rounding errors in an assessment model of project led Engineering Education
title Measurement rounding errors in an assessment model of project led Engineering Education
spellingShingle Measurement rounding errors in an assessment model of project led Engineering Education
Moreira, Francisco
Active learning
Assessment
Project-led education
Rounding errors
Science & Technology
title_short Measurement rounding errors in an assessment model of project led Engineering Education
title_full Measurement rounding errors in an assessment model of project led Engineering Education
title_fullStr Measurement rounding errors in an assessment model of project led Engineering Education
title_full_unstemmed Measurement rounding errors in an assessment model of project led Engineering Education
title_sort Measurement rounding errors in an assessment model of project led Engineering Education
author Moreira, Francisco
author_facet Moreira, Francisco
Sousa, Rui M.
Leão, Celina Pinto
Alves, Anabela Carvalho
Lima, Rui M.
author_role author
author2 Sousa, Rui M.
Leão, Celina Pinto
Alves, Anabela Carvalho
Lima, Rui M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moreira, Francisco
Sousa, Rui M.
Leão, Celina Pinto
Alves, Anabela Carvalho
Lima, Rui M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Active learning
Assessment
Project-led education
Rounding errors
Science & Technology
topic Active learning
Assessment
Project-led education
Rounding errors
Science & Technology
description This paper analyzes the rounding errors that occur in the assessment of an interdisciplinary Project-Led Education (PLE) process implemented in the Integrated Master degree on Industrial Management and Engineering (IME) at University of Minho. PLE is an innovative educational methodology which makes use of active learning, promoting higher levels of motivation and students’ autonomy. The assessment model is based on multiple evaluation components with different weights. Each component can be evaluated by several teachers involved in different Project Supporting Courses (PSC). This model can be affected by different types of errors, namely: (1) rounding errors, and (2) non-uniform criteria of rounding the grades. A rigorous analysis of the assessment model was made and the rounding errors involved on each project component were characterized and measured. This resulted in a global maximum error of 0.308 on the individual student project grade, in a 0 to 100 scale. This analysis intended to improve not only the reliability of the assessment results, but also teachers’ awareness of this problem. Recommendations are also made in order to improve the assessment model and reduce the rounding errors as much as possible.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/18307
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/18307
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1868-1646
1861-2121
10.3991/ijoe.v5s2.1092
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Association of Online Engineering
publisher.none.fl_str_mv International Association of Online Engineering
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777303736560910336