“What do you think people feel?” Emotional climate during a pandemic: Adaptation and validation of a scale

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa,Cristina de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Viseu,João, Vinagre,Helena, Páez,Dario, Valentim,Olga
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492021000200095
Resumo: Abstract Our study examined the psychometric properties and factor structure of an instrument to assess emotional climate during the COVID-19 pandemic using a sample of 601 Portuguese individuals. Two sub-samples were created, one to perform an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), composed of 300 participants, and the other to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), composed of 301 individuals. Two factors were found: positive and negative emotional climate. In the EFA, both factors established a negative and significant correlation. However, the CFA presented a better fit with two independent factors. Reliability analysis indicated acceptable values for both dimensions. There was also evidence of discriminant, convergent, and criterion validity. More negative emotions were perceived regarding the social climate. Results were discussed in the frame of different positive and negative psychosocial variables related to positive and negative emotional climates, as well as positive emotional climate as a resource for collective resilience.
id RCAP_709015c42f719ccbd0e3b27f9ef130f7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0874-20492021000200095
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling “What do you think people feel?” Emotional climate during a pandemic: Adaptation and validation of a scaleConfirmatory factor analysisEmotional climateExploratory factor analysisValidityReliabilityAbstract Our study examined the psychometric properties and factor structure of an instrument to assess emotional climate during the COVID-19 pandemic using a sample of 601 Portuguese individuals. Two sub-samples were created, one to perform an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), composed of 300 participants, and the other to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), composed of 301 individuals. Two factors were found: positive and negative emotional climate. In the EFA, both factors established a negative and significant correlation. However, the CFA presented a better fit with two independent factors. Reliability analysis indicated acceptable values for both dimensions. There was also evidence of discriminant, convergent, and criterion validity. More negative emotions were perceived regarding the social climate. Results were discussed in the frame of different positive and negative psychosocial variables related to positive and negative emotional climates, as well as positive emotional climate as a resource for collective resilience.Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia (APP)Edições Colibri2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492021000200095Psicologia v.35 n.2 2021reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492021000200095Sousa,Cristina deViseu,JoãoVinagre,HelenaPáez,DarioValentim,Olgainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-27T12:26:34ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “What do you think people feel?” Emotional climate during a pandemic: Adaptation and validation of a scale
title “What do you think people feel?” Emotional climate during a pandemic: Adaptation and validation of a scale
spellingShingle “What do you think people feel?” Emotional climate during a pandemic: Adaptation and validation of a scale
Sousa,Cristina de
Confirmatory factor analysis
Emotional climate
Exploratory factor analysis
Validity
Reliability
title_short “What do you think people feel?” Emotional climate during a pandemic: Adaptation and validation of a scale
title_full “What do you think people feel?” Emotional climate during a pandemic: Adaptation and validation of a scale
title_fullStr “What do you think people feel?” Emotional climate during a pandemic: Adaptation and validation of a scale
title_full_unstemmed “What do you think people feel?” Emotional climate during a pandemic: Adaptation and validation of a scale
title_sort “What do you think people feel?” Emotional climate during a pandemic: Adaptation and validation of a scale
author Sousa,Cristina de
author_facet Sousa,Cristina de
Viseu,João
Vinagre,Helena
Páez,Dario
Valentim,Olga
author_role author
author2 Viseu,João
Vinagre,Helena
Páez,Dario
Valentim,Olga
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa,Cristina de
Viseu,João
Vinagre,Helena
Páez,Dario
Valentim,Olga
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Confirmatory factor analysis
Emotional climate
Exploratory factor analysis
Validity
Reliability
topic Confirmatory factor analysis
Emotional climate
Exploratory factor analysis
Validity
Reliability
description Abstract Our study examined the psychometric properties and factor structure of an instrument to assess emotional climate during the COVID-19 pandemic using a sample of 601 Portuguese individuals. Two sub-samples were created, one to perform an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), composed of 300 participants, and the other to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), composed of 301 individuals. Two factors were found: positive and negative emotional climate. In the EFA, both factors established a negative and significant correlation. However, the CFA presented a better fit with two independent factors. Reliability analysis indicated acceptable values for both dimensions. There was also evidence of discriminant, convergent, and criterion validity. More negative emotions were perceived regarding the social climate. Results were discussed in the frame of different positive and negative psychosocial variables related to positive and negative emotional climates, as well as positive emotional climate as a resource for collective resilience.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492021000200095
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492021000200095
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0874-20492021000200095
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia (APP)
Edições Colibri
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia (APP)
Edições Colibri
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia v.35 n.2 2021
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777304427717197824