Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa, M. J.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: González-Loureiro, M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/14155
Resumo: In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade. The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “who-knows-what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice
id RCAP_751c73e24fe472e8a8337bcaa7363f67
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/14155
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisationsFormalisationTacitnessKnowledge sharingKnowledge creationAction researchInnovation processCase studyIn the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade. The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “who-knows-what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practiceIndependent Journal of Management and Production2017-07-27T08:26:40Z2015-01-01T00:00:00Z20152019-05-17T12:55:05Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/14155eng2236-269X10.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251Sousa, M. J.González-Loureiro, M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:34:06Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/14155Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:15:24.930747Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
title Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
spellingShingle Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
Sousa, M. J.
Formalisation
Tacitness
Knowledge sharing
Knowledge creation
Action research
Innovation process
Case study
title_short Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
title_full Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
title_fullStr Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
title_full_unstemmed Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
title_sort Formalisation versus tacitness: keys for creating and sharing knowledge in innovative large organisations
author Sousa, M. J.
author_facet Sousa, M. J.
González-Loureiro, M.
author_role author
author2 González-Loureiro, M.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa, M. J.
González-Loureiro, M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Formalisation
Tacitness
Knowledge sharing
Knowledge creation
Action research
Innovation process
Case study
topic Formalisation
Tacitness
Knowledge sharing
Knowledge creation
Action research
Innovation process
Case study
description In the situated learning theory, we disclose the existence of some tensions that may arise from two opposite forces within a context of communities of practice: the need for formalisation (large enterprises) and tacitness (creativity and innovation). Our study focuses on how these tensions are dealt with in a case study of a Portuguese innovative large enterprise that has developed a knowledge strategy over the last decade. The keys for overcoming this risky confrontation are related to a combination of “knowledge vision” and the coordinator and culture roles. A question to be addressed by firms in similar situation is “who-knows-what”, in order to identify the key knowledge that must be transformed from tacit into explicit. This would avoid wasting too many resources on making explicit the wrong tacit knowledge. Further research is required in other firms and contexts, on a still underestimated problem within communities of practice
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
2015
2017-07-27T08:26:40Z
2019-05-17T12:55:05Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/14155
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/14155
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2236-269X
10.14807/ijmp.v6i1.251
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Independent Journal of Management and Production
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Independent Journal of Management and Production
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134711776280576