Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quintal, Carlota
Publication Date: 2023
Other Authors: Antunes, Micaela
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Download full: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443
Summary: Introduction: Screening is effective in reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of, and income-related inequalities in, screening attendance, in Portugal for population-based screening programs.Methods: Data from the Portuguese Health Interview Survey 2019 was used. Variables included in the analysis were self-reported: mammography, pap smear test, fecal occult blood test. Prevalence and concentration indices were computed at national/regional level. We analyzed: up-to-date screening (within recommended age/interval), under-screening (never or overdue screening), and over-screening (due to frequency higher than recommended or screening outside target group).Results: Up-to-date screening rates were 81.1%, 72%, and 40%, for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer, respectively. Never-screening was 3.4%, 15.7%, and 39.9%, for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Over-screening related with frequency was highest for cervical cancer; in breast cancer, over-screening was observed outside recommended age, affecting one third of younger women and one fourth of older women. In these cancers, over-screening was concentrated among women with higher income. Never-screening was concentrated among individuals with lower income for cervical cancer and higher income for colorectal cancer. Beyond the recommended age, 50% of individuals never underwent screening for colorectal cancer and 41% of women never underwent screening for cervical cancer.Conclusion: Overall, screening attendance was high, and inequalities were low in the case of breast cancer screening. The priority for colorectal cancer should be to increase screening attendance.
id RCAP_7a86984452eaa5d0bb4822f4a99caaf4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/19443
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in PortugalRetrato da Prevalência e Desigualdades na Participação em Rastreios Oncológicos de Base Populacional em PortugalEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningNeoplasms/diagnosisNeoplasms/prevention and controlPortugalSocioeconomic FactorsDetecção Precoce de CancroFactores SocioeconómicosNeoplasias/diagnósticoNeoplasias/prevenção e contoloPortugalRastreioIntroduction: Screening is effective in reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of, and income-related inequalities in, screening attendance, in Portugal for population-based screening programs.Methods: Data from the Portuguese Health Interview Survey 2019 was used. Variables included in the analysis were self-reported: mammography, pap smear test, fecal occult blood test. Prevalence and concentration indices were computed at national/regional level. We analyzed: up-to-date screening (within recommended age/interval), under-screening (never or overdue screening), and over-screening (due to frequency higher than recommended or screening outside target group).Results: Up-to-date screening rates were 81.1%, 72%, and 40%, for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer, respectively. Never-screening was 3.4%, 15.7%, and 39.9%, for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Over-screening related with frequency was highest for cervical cancer; in breast cancer, over-screening was observed outside recommended age, affecting one third of younger women and one fourth of older women. In these cancers, over-screening was concentrated among women with higher income. Never-screening was concentrated among individuals with lower income for cervical cancer and higher income for colorectal cancer. Beyond the recommended age, 50% of individuals never underwent screening for colorectal cancer and 41% of women never underwent screening for cervical cancer.Conclusion: Overall, screening attendance was high, and inequalities were low in the case of breast cancer screening. The priority for colorectal cancer should be to increase screening attendance.Introdução: Os rastreios reduzem a morbilidade e mortalidade associadas ao cancro. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar os níveis de participação em rastreios oncológicos de base populacional em Portugal, e respetivas desigualdades.Métodos: Os dados provêm do Inquérito Nacional de Saúde 2019. As variáveis utilizadas são: mamografia, citologia e a pesquisa de sangue oculto nas fezes. Calculámos prevalências e índices de concentração ao nível nacional e regional. Analisámos a participação ‘devida’ (idade/intervalo recomendados), ‘insuficiente’ (nunca ou em atraso), ‘excessiva’ (frequência superior à recomendada ou em idade não recomendada).Resultados: A participação ‘devida’ atingiu 81,1%, 72% e 40%, enquanto a participação ‘insuficiente-nunca’ atingiu 3,4%, 15,7% e 39,9% para cancro da mama, cancro do colo do útero e cancro colorretal, respetivamente. A prevalência de participação ‘excessiva’ foi mais alta no cancro do colo do útero; relativamente ao cancro da mama, um terço das mulheres mais novas e um quarto das mulheres mais velhas fez mamografia. Este ‘excesso’ está concentrado nas mulheres com rendimento mais elevado. A participação ‘insuficiente-nunca’ está concentrada nos indivíduos com rendimentos mais baixos no cancro do colo do útero e nos rendimentos mais altos no colorretal. Acima da idade recomendada, 50% dos indivíduos nunca rastrearam para cancro colorretal e 41% das mulheres nunca o fizeram para cancro do colo do útero.Conclusão: No rastreio do cancro da mama, no geral, a participação foi elevada e as desigualdades foram reduzidas. No cancro colorretal, a prioridade deve ser aumentar a participação no rastreio.Ordem dos Médicos2023-06-19info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 9 (2023): September; 577-587Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 N.º 9 (2023): Setembro; 577-5871646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15157https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15154https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15155https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15156Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQuintal, CarlotaAntunes, Micaela2023-09-03T03:00:34Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/19443Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:01:32.122125Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal
Retrato da Prevalência e Desigualdades na Participação em Rastreios Oncológicos de Base Populacional em Portugal
title Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal
spellingShingle Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal
Quintal, Carlota
Early Detection of Cancer
Mass Screening
Neoplasms/diagnosis
Neoplasms/prevention and control
Portugal
Socioeconomic Factors
Detecção Precoce de Cancro
Factores Socioeconómicos
Neoplasias/diagnóstico
Neoplasias/prevenção e contolo
Portugal
Rastreio
title_short Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal
title_full Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal
title_fullStr Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal
title_sort Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal
author Quintal, Carlota
author_facet Quintal, Carlota
Antunes, Micaela
author_role author
author2 Antunes, Micaela
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Quintal, Carlota
Antunes, Micaela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Early Detection of Cancer
Mass Screening
Neoplasms/diagnosis
Neoplasms/prevention and control
Portugal
Socioeconomic Factors
Detecção Precoce de Cancro
Factores Socioeconómicos
Neoplasias/diagnóstico
Neoplasias/prevenção e contolo
Portugal
Rastreio
topic Early Detection of Cancer
Mass Screening
Neoplasms/diagnosis
Neoplasms/prevention and control
Portugal
Socioeconomic Factors
Detecção Precoce de Cancro
Factores Socioeconómicos
Neoplasias/diagnóstico
Neoplasias/prevenção e contolo
Portugal
Rastreio
description Introduction: Screening is effective in reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of, and income-related inequalities in, screening attendance, in Portugal for population-based screening programs.Methods: Data from the Portuguese Health Interview Survey 2019 was used. Variables included in the analysis were self-reported: mammography, pap smear test, fecal occult blood test. Prevalence and concentration indices were computed at national/regional level. We analyzed: up-to-date screening (within recommended age/interval), under-screening (never or overdue screening), and over-screening (due to frequency higher than recommended or screening outside target group).Results: Up-to-date screening rates were 81.1%, 72%, and 40%, for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer, respectively. Never-screening was 3.4%, 15.7%, and 39.9%, for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Over-screening related with frequency was highest for cervical cancer; in breast cancer, over-screening was observed outside recommended age, affecting one third of younger women and one fourth of older women. In these cancers, over-screening was concentrated among women with higher income. Never-screening was concentrated among individuals with lower income for cervical cancer and higher income for colorectal cancer. Beyond the recommended age, 50% of individuals never underwent screening for colorectal cancer and 41% of women never underwent screening for cervical cancer.Conclusion: Overall, screening attendance was high, and inequalities were low in the case of breast cancer screening. The priority for colorectal cancer should be to increase screening attendance.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-19
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15157
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15154
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15155
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15156
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 9 (2023): September; 577-587
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 N.º 9 (2023): Setembro; 577-587
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131683093479424