Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2023 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Download full: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443 |
Summary: | Introduction: Screening is effective in reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of, and income-related inequalities in, screening attendance, in Portugal for population-based screening programs.Methods: Data from the Portuguese Health Interview Survey 2019 was used. Variables included in the analysis were self-reported: mammography, pap smear test, fecal occult blood test. Prevalence and concentration indices were computed at national/regional level. We analyzed: up-to-date screening (within recommended age/interval), under-screening (never or overdue screening), and over-screening (due to frequency higher than recommended or screening outside target group).Results: Up-to-date screening rates were 81.1%, 72%, and 40%, for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer, respectively. Never-screening was 3.4%, 15.7%, and 39.9%, for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Over-screening related with frequency was highest for cervical cancer; in breast cancer, over-screening was observed outside recommended age, affecting one third of younger women and one fourth of older women. In these cancers, over-screening was concentrated among women with higher income. Never-screening was concentrated among individuals with lower income for cervical cancer and higher income for colorectal cancer. Beyond the recommended age, 50% of individuals never underwent screening for colorectal cancer and 41% of women never underwent screening for cervical cancer.Conclusion: Overall, screening attendance was high, and inequalities were low in the case of breast cancer screening. The priority for colorectal cancer should be to increase screening attendance. |
id |
RCAP_7a86984452eaa5d0bb4822f4a99caaf4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/19443 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in PortugalRetrato da Prevalência e Desigualdades na Participação em Rastreios Oncológicos de Base Populacional em PortugalEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningNeoplasms/diagnosisNeoplasms/prevention and controlPortugalSocioeconomic FactorsDetecção Precoce de CancroFactores SocioeconómicosNeoplasias/diagnósticoNeoplasias/prevenção e contoloPortugalRastreioIntroduction: Screening is effective in reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of, and income-related inequalities in, screening attendance, in Portugal for population-based screening programs.Methods: Data from the Portuguese Health Interview Survey 2019 was used. Variables included in the analysis were self-reported: mammography, pap smear test, fecal occult blood test. Prevalence and concentration indices were computed at national/regional level. We analyzed: up-to-date screening (within recommended age/interval), under-screening (never or overdue screening), and over-screening (due to frequency higher than recommended or screening outside target group).Results: Up-to-date screening rates were 81.1%, 72%, and 40%, for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer, respectively. Never-screening was 3.4%, 15.7%, and 39.9%, for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Over-screening related with frequency was highest for cervical cancer; in breast cancer, over-screening was observed outside recommended age, affecting one third of younger women and one fourth of older women. In these cancers, over-screening was concentrated among women with higher income. Never-screening was concentrated among individuals with lower income for cervical cancer and higher income for colorectal cancer. Beyond the recommended age, 50% of individuals never underwent screening for colorectal cancer and 41% of women never underwent screening for cervical cancer.Conclusion: Overall, screening attendance was high, and inequalities were low in the case of breast cancer screening. The priority for colorectal cancer should be to increase screening attendance.Introdução: Os rastreios reduzem a morbilidade e mortalidade associadas ao cancro. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar os níveis de participação em rastreios oncológicos de base populacional em Portugal, e respetivas desigualdades.Métodos: Os dados provêm do Inquérito Nacional de Saúde 2019. As variáveis utilizadas são: mamografia, citologia e a pesquisa de sangue oculto nas fezes. Calculámos prevalências e índices de concentração ao nível nacional e regional. Analisámos a participação ‘devida’ (idade/intervalo recomendados), ‘insuficiente’ (nunca ou em atraso), ‘excessiva’ (frequência superior à recomendada ou em idade não recomendada).Resultados: A participação ‘devida’ atingiu 81,1%, 72% e 40%, enquanto a participação ‘insuficiente-nunca’ atingiu 3,4%, 15,7% e 39,9% para cancro da mama, cancro do colo do útero e cancro colorretal, respetivamente. A prevalência de participação ‘excessiva’ foi mais alta no cancro do colo do útero; relativamente ao cancro da mama, um terço das mulheres mais novas e um quarto das mulheres mais velhas fez mamografia. Este ‘excesso’ está concentrado nas mulheres com rendimento mais elevado. A participação ‘insuficiente-nunca’ está concentrada nos indivíduos com rendimentos mais baixos no cancro do colo do útero e nos rendimentos mais altos no colorretal. Acima da idade recomendada, 50% dos indivíduos nunca rastrearam para cancro colorretal e 41% das mulheres nunca o fizeram para cancro do colo do útero.Conclusão: No rastreio do cancro da mama, no geral, a participação foi elevada e as desigualdades foram reduzidas. No cancro colorretal, a prioridade deve ser aumentar a participação no rastreio.Ordem dos Médicos2023-06-19info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 9 (2023): September; 577-587Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 N.º 9 (2023): Setembro; 577-5871646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15157https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15154https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15155https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15156Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQuintal, CarlotaAntunes, Micaela2023-09-03T03:00:34Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/19443Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:01:32.122125Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal Retrato da Prevalência e Desigualdades na Participação em Rastreios Oncológicos de Base Populacional em Portugal |
title |
Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal |
spellingShingle |
Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal Quintal, Carlota Early Detection of Cancer Mass Screening Neoplasms/diagnosis Neoplasms/prevention and control Portugal Socioeconomic Factors Detecção Precoce de Cancro Factores Socioeconómicos Neoplasias/diagnóstico Neoplasias/prevenção e contolo Portugal Rastreio |
title_short |
Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal |
title_full |
Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal |
title_fullStr |
Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal |
title_sort |
Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal |
author |
Quintal, Carlota |
author_facet |
Quintal, Carlota Antunes, Micaela |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Antunes, Micaela |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Quintal, Carlota Antunes, Micaela |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Early Detection of Cancer Mass Screening Neoplasms/diagnosis Neoplasms/prevention and control Portugal Socioeconomic Factors Detecção Precoce de Cancro Factores Socioeconómicos Neoplasias/diagnóstico Neoplasias/prevenção e contolo Portugal Rastreio |
topic |
Early Detection of Cancer Mass Screening Neoplasms/diagnosis Neoplasms/prevention and control Portugal Socioeconomic Factors Detecção Precoce de Cancro Factores Socioeconómicos Neoplasias/diagnóstico Neoplasias/prevenção e contolo Portugal Rastreio |
description |
Introduction: Screening is effective in reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of, and income-related inequalities in, screening attendance, in Portugal for population-based screening programs.Methods: Data from the Portuguese Health Interview Survey 2019 was used. Variables included in the analysis were self-reported: mammography, pap smear test, fecal occult blood test. Prevalence and concentration indices were computed at national/regional level. We analyzed: up-to-date screening (within recommended age/interval), under-screening (never or overdue screening), and over-screening (due to frequency higher than recommended or screening outside target group).Results: Up-to-date screening rates were 81.1%, 72%, and 40%, for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer, respectively. Never-screening was 3.4%, 15.7%, and 39.9%, for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Over-screening related with frequency was highest for cervical cancer; in breast cancer, over-screening was observed outside recommended age, affecting one third of younger women and one fourth of older women. In these cancers, over-screening was concentrated among women with higher income. Never-screening was concentrated among individuals with lower income for cervical cancer and higher income for colorectal cancer. Beyond the recommended age, 50% of individuals never underwent screening for colorectal cancer and 41% of women never underwent screening for cervical cancer.Conclusion: Overall, screening attendance was high, and inequalities were low in the case of breast cancer screening. The priority for colorectal cancer should be to increase screening attendance. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-19 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15157 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15154 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15155 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19443/15156 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Acta Médica Portuguesa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Acta Médica Portuguesa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 9 (2023): September; 577-587 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 N.º 9 (2023): Setembro; 577-587 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131683093479424 |