How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto-Correia, Teresa
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Machado, C., Barroso, Filipe, Picchi, P., Turpin, N., Bousset, J.P., Chabab, N., Michelin, Y.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/10248
https://doi.org/Pinto-Correia, T., Machado, C., Barroso, F., Picchi, P., Turpin, N., Bousset, JP., Chabab, N. and Michelin, Y. (2013). How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences. Environmental Science and Policy. (32), pg. 37-47. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.016
Resumo: Facing the changes in the agricultural sector as well as new growing demands from society in relation to the European countryside, new questions emerge as to the management of the agricultural landscapes. The multiple combination of production with the support of multiple functions is a challenge for present day management. Tools are needed that make it possible to assess how a certain landscape can support in particular cultural and amenity functions, those that directly depend on the public preferences. The objective of this paper is to describe the proposed Landscape Amenity Model (LAM), a landscape amenities evaluation tool developed within the framework of the Integrated Project SEAMLESS. The LAM is based on the calculation of the Index of Function Suitability (IFS) for a given landscape, based on the distance between that landscape and the preferred landscape, as expressed by different users. The paper goes further in applying IFS namely by examining two different approaches for deriving land cover pattern preferences by users, either gathered from questionnaire surveys or expert panels in two case-studies, one in Portugal and another in France, respectively.
id RCAP_8f36d15d3626c350f4537422377c4cd6
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/10248
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferencesLandscape functionsPreferencesUsersIndicatorsSurveyFacing the changes in the agricultural sector as well as new growing demands from society in relation to the European countryside, new questions emerge as to the management of the agricultural landscapes. The multiple combination of production with the support of multiple functions is a challenge for present day management. Tools are needed that make it possible to assess how a certain landscape can support in particular cultural and amenity functions, those that directly depend on the public preferences. The objective of this paper is to describe the proposed Landscape Amenity Model (LAM), a landscape amenities evaluation tool developed within the framework of the Integrated Project SEAMLESS. The LAM is based on the calculation of the Index of Function Suitability (IFS) for a given landscape, based on the distance between that landscape and the preferred landscape, as expressed by different users. The paper goes further in applying IFS namely by examining two different approaches for deriving land cover pattern preferences by users, either gathered from questionnaire surveys or expert panels in two case-studies, one in Portugal and another in France, respectively.Elsevier Ltd.2014-01-29T12:47:49Z2014-01-292013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/10248https://doi.org/Pinto-Correia, T., Machado, C., Barroso, F., Picchi, P., Turpin, N., Bousset, JP., Chabab, N. and Michelin, Y. (2013). How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences. Environmental Science and Policy. (32), pg. 37-47. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.016http://hdl.handle.net/10174/10248porhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901113000178PAO – Publicações – Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científicamtpc@uevora.ptndflb@uevora.ptndndndndndPinto-Correia, TeresaMachado, C.Barroso, FilipePicchi, P.Turpin, N.Bousset, J.P.Chabab, N.Michelin, Y.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-08-08T04:02:16ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences
title How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences
spellingShingle How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences
Pinto-Correia, Teresa
Landscape functions
Preferences
Users
Indicators
Survey
title_short How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences
title_full How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences
title_fullStr How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences
title_full_unstemmed How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences
title_sort How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences
author Pinto-Correia, Teresa
author_facet Pinto-Correia, Teresa
Machado, C.
Barroso, Filipe
Picchi, P.
Turpin, N.
Bousset, J.P.
Chabab, N.
Michelin, Y.
author_role author
author2 Machado, C.
Barroso, Filipe
Picchi, P.
Turpin, N.
Bousset, J.P.
Chabab, N.
Michelin, Y.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto-Correia, Teresa
Machado, C.
Barroso, Filipe
Picchi, P.
Turpin, N.
Bousset, J.P.
Chabab, N.
Michelin, Y.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Landscape functions
Preferences
Users
Indicators
Survey
topic Landscape functions
Preferences
Users
Indicators
Survey
description Facing the changes in the agricultural sector as well as new growing demands from society in relation to the European countryside, new questions emerge as to the management of the agricultural landscapes. The multiple combination of production with the support of multiple functions is a challenge for present day management. Tools are needed that make it possible to assess how a certain landscape can support in particular cultural and amenity functions, those that directly depend on the public preferences. The objective of this paper is to describe the proposed Landscape Amenity Model (LAM), a landscape amenities evaluation tool developed within the framework of the Integrated Project SEAMLESS. The LAM is based on the calculation of the Index of Function Suitability (IFS) for a given landscape, based on the distance between that landscape and the preferred landscape, as expressed by different users. The paper goes further in applying IFS namely by examining two different approaches for deriving land cover pattern preferences by users, either gathered from questionnaire surveys or expert panels in two case-studies, one in Portugal and another in France, respectively.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
2014-01-29T12:47:49Z
2014-01-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/10248
https://doi.org/Pinto-Correia, T., Machado, C., Barroso, F., Picchi, P., Turpin, N., Bousset, JP., Chabab, N. and Michelin, Y. (2013). How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences. Environmental Science and Policy. (32), pg. 37-47. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.016
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/10248
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/10248
https://doi.org/Pinto-Correia, T., Machado, C., Barroso, F., Picchi, P., Turpin, N., Bousset, JP., Chabab, N. and Michelin, Y. (2013). How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences. Environmental Science and Policy. (32), pg. 37-47. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901113000178
PAO – Publicações – Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica
mtpc@uevora.pt
nd
flb@uevora.pt
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Ltd.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Ltd.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777304591999696896