Retinoscopy/autorefraction : which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jorge, Jorge
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Almeida, José B., Parafita, Manuel A., Queirós, A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/5799
Resumo: Purpose: The aim of this study was to estimate the agreement between an autorefractor (Nidek ARK 700A) and retinoscopy with subjective refraction. Methods: Measurements of autorefraction obtained with the ARK700A and retinoscopy were performed on 192 right eyes from 192 healthy young adults and compared with subjective refraction. These measurements were performed without cycloplegia. The age range was 18-34 years, with a mean value of 21.6 years and a standard deviation (SD) of 2.66 years. Results: A comparison of the autorefractor and subjective refraction results shows that; (1) for the mean spherical equivalent (M) the autorefractor yields more negative values (–0.44 ± 0.54 D, p = 0.000); (2) for the Jackson cross-cylinder at axis 0º (J0), the autorefractor yields more positive values than the subjective ones (–0.05 ± 0.13 D, p = 0.000); (3) and for the Jackson cross-cylinder at axis 45º (J45), the autorefractor results are more negative (–0.02 ± 0.09 D, p = 0.019). The differences found for each component M, J0 e J45 are statistically significant. By comparing retinoscopy with the subjective exam, there are no statistically significant differences found for the M component, (–0.02 ± 0.33 D, p = 0.304). For the J0 and J45 components, the differences are statistically significant (–0.07 ± 0.10 D, p = 0.000;–0.01 ± 0.08 D, p = 0.008). Conclusions: the present results confirm that when performed by an experienced clinician, retinoscopy is more accurate than automatic refraction giving a better starting point to non-cycloplegic refraction.
id RCAP_9b6cb7a1c4b9473e4d37e67839e121b8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/5799
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Retinoscopy/autorefraction : which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?RefractionRefractive errorAccuracyAutomated refractorRetinoscopySubjective refractionOrthogonal functionsAstigmatismScience & TechnologyPurpose: The aim of this study was to estimate the agreement between an autorefractor (Nidek ARK 700A) and retinoscopy with subjective refraction. Methods: Measurements of autorefraction obtained with the ARK700A and retinoscopy were performed on 192 right eyes from 192 healthy young adults and compared with subjective refraction. These measurements were performed without cycloplegia. The age range was 18-34 years, with a mean value of 21.6 years and a standard deviation (SD) of 2.66 years. Results: A comparison of the autorefractor and subjective refraction results shows that; (1) for the mean spherical equivalent (M) the autorefractor yields more negative values (–0.44 ± 0.54 D, p = 0.000); (2) for the Jackson cross-cylinder at axis 0º (J0), the autorefractor yields more positive values than the subjective ones (–0.05 ± 0.13 D, p = 0.000); (3) and for the Jackson cross-cylinder at axis 45º (J45), the autorefractor results are more negative (–0.02 ± 0.09 D, p = 0.019). The differences found for each component M, J0 e J45 are statistically significant. By comparing retinoscopy with the subjective exam, there are no statistically significant differences found for the M component, (–0.02 ± 0.33 D, p = 0.304). For the J0 and J45 components, the differences are statistically significant (–0.07 ± 0.10 D, p = 0.000;–0.01 ± 0.08 D, p = 0.008). Conclusions: the present results confirm that when performed by an experienced clinician, retinoscopy is more accurate than automatic refraction giving a better starting point to non-cycloplegic refraction.Lippincott, Williams & WilkinsUniversidade do MinhoJorge, JorgeAlmeida, José B.Parafita, Manuel A.Queirós, A.2005-012005-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/5799eng"Optometry and vision science". ISSN 1040-5488. 82:1 (Jan. 2005) 64-68.1040-548815630406info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:24:44Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/5799Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:18:49.436291Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Retinoscopy/autorefraction : which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
title Retinoscopy/autorefraction : which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
spellingShingle Retinoscopy/autorefraction : which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
Jorge, Jorge
Refraction
Refractive error
Accuracy
Automated refractor
Retinoscopy
Subjective refraction
Orthogonal functions
Astigmatism
Science & Technology
title_short Retinoscopy/autorefraction : which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
title_full Retinoscopy/autorefraction : which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
title_fullStr Retinoscopy/autorefraction : which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
title_full_unstemmed Retinoscopy/autorefraction : which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
title_sort Retinoscopy/autorefraction : which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
author Jorge, Jorge
author_facet Jorge, Jorge
Almeida, José B.
Parafita, Manuel A.
Queirós, A.
author_role author
author2 Almeida, José B.
Parafita, Manuel A.
Queirós, A.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jorge, Jorge
Almeida, José B.
Parafita, Manuel A.
Queirós, A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Refraction
Refractive error
Accuracy
Automated refractor
Retinoscopy
Subjective refraction
Orthogonal functions
Astigmatism
Science & Technology
topic Refraction
Refractive error
Accuracy
Automated refractor
Retinoscopy
Subjective refraction
Orthogonal functions
Astigmatism
Science & Technology
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to estimate the agreement between an autorefractor (Nidek ARK 700A) and retinoscopy with subjective refraction. Methods: Measurements of autorefraction obtained with the ARK700A and retinoscopy were performed on 192 right eyes from 192 healthy young adults and compared with subjective refraction. These measurements were performed without cycloplegia. The age range was 18-34 years, with a mean value of 21.6 years and a standard deviation (SD) of 2.66 years. Results: A comparison of the autorefractor and subjective refraction results shows that; (1) for the mean spherical equivalent (M) the autorefractor yields more negative values (–0.44 ± 0.54 D, p = 0.000); (2) for the Jackson cross-cylinder at axis 0º (J0), the autorefractor yields more positive values than the subjective ones (–0.05 ± 0.13 D, p = 0.000); (3) and for the Jackson cross-cylinder at axis 45º (J45), the autorefractor results are more negative (–0.02 ± 0.09 D, p = 0.019). The differences found for each component M, J0 e J45 are statistically significant. By comparing retinoscopy with the subjective exam, there are no statistically significant differences found for the M component, (–0.02 ± 0.33 D, p = 0.304). For the J0 and J45 components, the differences are statistically significant (–0.07 ± 0.10 D, p = 0.000;–0.01 ± 0.08 D, p = 0.008). Conclusions: the present results confirm that when performed by an experienced clinician, retinoscopy is more accurate than automatic refraction giving a better starting point to non-cycloplegic refraction.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-01
2005-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/5799
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/5799
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv "Optometry and vision science". ISSN 1040-5488. 82:1 (Jan. 2005) 64-68.
1040-5488
15630406
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132644863115264