Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion by a Totally Videothoracoscopic Approach - New Paradigm?

• Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, C
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Silva, M, Cerejo, R, Portugal, G, Cunha, PS, Rodrigues, R, Oliveira, MM, Fragata, J
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4039
• topic: HSM CCT; HSM CAR; Adult; Aged; Female; Male; Humans; Middle Aged; Atrial Appendage* / surgery; Atrial Fibrillation* / surgery; Catheter Ablation* / adverse effects; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. Pharmacological and percutaneous catheter therapies are unsatisfactory, with potential serious adverse effects. Cox-Maze III/IV surgery, with higher rates of success, has not been widely adopted because of the associated complexity of the procedure. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the first patients submitted to surgical ablation of AF with occlusion of the left atrial appendage with a totally videothoracoscopic (VATS) approach in our institution. We describe the surgical technique and our results, including duration of surgery, hospital stay, complications and maintenance of sinus rhythm after surgery, at 6, 12 and 18 months of follow-up. Results: We studied 15 patients (ages ranging from 39 to 75 years old; 54,5% female gender). Mean time since the diagnosis of AF was 5,75 years. All had been submitted to prior catheter ablation (mean of 2 attempts). Mean diameter and volume of the left atrium was 42 mm (M-mode) and 70 ml (43 ml/m2), respectively. Mean duration of surgery was 2 hours and 22 minutes. In one patient we had to convert the surgery to median sternotomy. Mean hospital stay was 4,8 days. Mean time of follow-up was 12 months. During follow-up, 91%, 90% and 80% of the patients were in sinus rhythm at 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively. Conclusion: This surgical approach represents a real benefit for those patients with multiple attempts of catheter ablation without success. However, a larger sample of patients with a longer period of follow-up is necessary for further conclusions.