Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Cátia
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Lago, Paula, Fernandes, Samuel, Correia, Luís, Portela, Francisco, Vieira, Ana Isabel, Patita, Marta, Arroja, Bruno, Ministro, Paula, Alves, Catarina, Dias, Cláudia Camila, Magro, Fernando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2724
Resumo: Background and aims: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) and anti-infliximab antibodies (ATIs) is essential for treatment optimisation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The aim of this study was to estimate and compare the agreement and accuracy between a new rapid test and three established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to quantify ATIs levels, and to evaluate the impact of exogenous IFX on the performance of these assays. Methods: We analysed 200 serum samples from 57 IBD outpatients in IFX induction or maintenance therapy at six IBD centres in Portugal. ATI levels were quantified using the rapid test Quantum Blue® (QB) Anti-Infliximab (Bühlmann) and three established ELISAs: In-House, Theradiag (Lisa Tracker Anti-Infliximab), and Immundiagnostik (IDKmonitor Infliximab). ATIs were quantified in patients' serum samples and spiked samples with exogenous IFX, based on analytical and clinical cutoffs. Qualitative agreement and accuracy were estimated by Cohen's kappa (k) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: ATIs quantification with clinical cutoffs showed a slight agreement between QB rapid test and In-House [k = 0.163 (0.051-0.276)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.085 (0.000-0.177)]. Regarding IFX/ATIs status, the QB rapid test showed a substantial agreement with Theradiag [k = 0.808 (0.729-0.888)] and a fair agreement with In-House [k = 0.343 (0.254-0.431)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.217 (0.138-0.297)]. The QB rapid test could not detect ATI-positive levels in samples with exogenous IFX at 5-300 µg/ml. Interference on ATIs detection was observed at exogenous IFX ⩾30 µg/ml for In-house and Immundiagnostik assays. Conclusion: QB rapid test is only suitable to detect ATI-positive levels in the absence of IFX.
id RCAP_a2625b8df96aefe263b53c40d118b1e3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/2724
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassaysantibodiesdrug monitoringenzyme-linked immunosorbent assayimmunoassayinflammatory bowel diseasesinfliximabpoint-of-care systemsBackground and aims: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) and anti-infliximab antibodies (ATIs) is essential for treatment optimisation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The aim of this study was to estimate and compare the agreement and accuracy between a new rapid test and three established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to quantify ATIs levels, and to evaluate the impact of exogenous IFX on the performance of these assays. Methods: We analysed 200 serum samples from 57 IBD outpatients in IFX induction or maintenance therapy at six IBD centres in Portugal. ATI levels were quantified using the rapid test Quantum Blue® (QB) Anti-Infliximab (Bühlmann) and three established ELISAs: In-House, Theradiag (Lisa Tracker Anti-Infliximab), and Immundiagnostik (IDKmonitor Infliximab). ATIs were quantified in patients' serum samples and spiked samples with exogenous IFX, based on analytical and clinical cutoffs. Qualitative agreement and accuracy were estimated by Cohen's kappa (k) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: ATIs quantification with clinical cutoffs showed a slight agreement between QB rapid test and In-House [k = 0.163 (0.051-0.276)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.085 (0.000-0.177)]. Regarding IFX/ATIs status, the QB rapid test showed a substantial agreement with Theradiag [k = 0.808 (0.729-0.888)] and a fair agreement with In-House [k = 0.343 (0.254-0.431)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.217 (0.138-0.297)]. The QB rapid test could not detect ATI-positive levels in samples with exogenous IFX at 5-300 µg/ml. Interference on ATIs detection was observed at exogenous IFX ⩾30 µg/ml for In-house and Immundiagnostik assays. Conclusion: QB rapid test is only suitable to detect ATI-positive levels in the absence of IFX.The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded in part by the Portuguese IBD Study Group (GEDII), and in part by PDE/BDE/114583/2016, from Portuguese national funds by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT).SAGE PublicationsRepositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo AntónioRocha, CátiaLago, PaulaFernandes, SamuelCorreia, LuísPortela, FranciscoVieira, Ana IsabelPatita, MartaArroja, BrunoMinistro, PaulaAlves, CatarinaDias, Cláudia CamilaMagro, Fernando2022-07-14T14:07:47Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2724engRocha C, Lago P, Fernandes S, et al. Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020;13:1756284820965790. doi:10.1177/17562848209657901756-283X10.1177/1756284820965790info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-20T11:02:00Zoai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/2724Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:38:54.885367Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays
title Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays
spellingShingle Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays
Rocha, Cátia
antibodies
drug monitoring
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
immunoassay
inflammatory bowel diseases
infliximab
point-of-care systems
title_short Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays
title_full Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays
title_fullStr Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays
title_full_unstemmed Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays
title_sort Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays
author Rocha, Cátia
author_facet Rocha, Cátia
Lago, Paula
Fernandes, Samuel
Correia, Luís
Portela, Francisco
Vieira, Ana Isabel
Patita, Marta
Arroja, Bruno
Ministro, Paula
Alves, Catarina
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Magro, Fernando
author_role author
author2 Lago, Paula
Fernandes, Samuel
Correia, Luís
Portela, Francisco
Vieira, Ana Isabel
Patita, Marta
Arroja, Bruno
Ministro, Paula
Alves, Catarina
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Magro, Fernando
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha, Cátia
Lago, Paula
Fernandes, Samuel
Correia, Luís
Portela, Francisco
Vieira, Ana Isabel
Patita, Marta
Arroja, Bruno
Ministro, Paula
Alves, Catarina
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Magro, Fernando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv antibodies
drug monitoring
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
immunoassay
inflammatory bowel diseases
infliximab
point-of-care systems
topic antibodies
drug monitoring
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
immunoassay
inflammatory bowel diseases
infliximab
point-of-care systems
description Background and aims: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) and anti-infliximab antibodies (ATIs) is essential for treatment optimisation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The aim of this study was to estimate and compare the agreement and accuracy between a new rapid test and three established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to quantify ATIs levels, and to evaluate the impact of exogenous IFX on the performance of these assays. Methods: We analysed 200 serum samples from 57 IBD outpatients in IFX induction or maintenance therapy at six IBD centres in Portugal. ATI levels were quantified using the rapid test Quantum Blue® (QB) Anti-Infliximab (Bühlmann) and three established ELISAs: In-House, Theradiag (Lisa Tracker Anti-Infliximab), and Immundiagnostik (IDKmonitor Infliximab). ATIs were quantified in patients' serum samples and spiked samples with exogenous IFX, based on analytical and clinical cutoffs. Qualitative agreement and accuracy were estimated by Cohen's kappa (k) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: ATIs quantification with clinical cutoffs showed a slight agreement between QB rapid test and In-House [k = 0.163 (0.051-0.276)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.085 (0.000-0.177)]. Regarding IFX/ATIs status, the QB rapid test showed a substantial agreement with Theradiag [k = 0.808 (0.729-0.888)] and a fair agreement with In-House [k = 0.343 (0.254-0.431)] and Immundiagnostik [k = 0.217 (0.138-0.297)]. The QB rapid test could not detect ATI-positive levels in samples with exogenous IFX at 5-300 µg/ml. Interference on ATIs detection was observed at exogenous IFX ⩾30 µg/ml for In-house and Immundiagnostik assays. Conclusion: QB rapid test is only suitable to detect ATI-positive levels in the absence of IFX.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022-07-14T14:07:47Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2724
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2724
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Rocha C, Lago P, Fernandes S, et al. Rapid test detection of anti-infliximab antibodies: performance comparison with three different immunoassays. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020;13:1756284820965790. doi:10.1177/1756284820965790
1756-283X
10.1177/1756284820965790
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133649189208064