Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Linhares, D
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Neves, N, Ribeiro da Silva, M, Almeida Fonseca, J
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/17484
Resumo: Traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are common causes of spine surgery. Pedicle screw fixation is usually chosen, using monosegmentar, short or long segment instrumentations, with or without bone graft. This review aims to evaluate the effect of transpedicular fixation in traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A systematic search on controlled, randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing different methods of surgical treatment of this fractures was performed, followed by a process of article selection, data extraction and bias assessment by 3 independent authors. Eight articles were included in a total of 5 comparisons, between different transpedicular fixation techniques. No significant differences on function or quality of life, neurologic status or limitation of motion were found. Only instrumentation with fracture level screw incorporation showed significant decrease of pain when compared with instrumentation alone. Several techniques resulted in significant improvements of different radiological parameters. Significantly, surgeries with smaller duration were associated with lesser blood loss. Bone graft use caused a significant raise in post-operative complications, namely donor site pain. So, this paper showed that significative improvements in radiological parameters do not associate with correspondent clinical benefits, and only instrumentation with level screw incorporation is associated with a clear benefit on pain. Moreover, the need for bone graft is questioned, since it leads to no clinic-radiological improvement with a raise of complications. However, a small number of controlled studies is available on this topic.
id RCAP_a475b3726cd449e4737ddd3d61832678
oai_identifier_str oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/17484
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Fixação com Parafusos Pediculares de Fraturas Traumáticas da Coluna Vertebral Torácica e Lombar. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.Fixação de FracturaFracturas da Coluna VertebralParafusos ÓsseosRevisão SistemáticaVértebras Lombares/ lesõesVértebras Torácicas/lesõesBone ScrewsFracture FixationLumbar Vertebrae/injuriesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpinal Fractures/ surgeryThoracic Vertebrae/injuriesTraumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are common causes of spine surgery. Pedicle screw fixation is usually chosen, using monosegmentar, short or long segment instrumentations, with or without bone graft. This review aims to evaluate the effect of transpedicular fixation in traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A systematic search on controlled, randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing different methods of surgical treatment of this fractures was performed, followed by a process of article selection, data extraction and bias assessment by 3 independent authors. Eight articles were included in a total of 5 comparisons, between different transpedicular fixation techniques. No significant differences on function or quality of life, neurologic status or limitation of motion were found. Only instrumentation with fracture level screw incorporation showed significant decrease of pain when compared with instrumentation alone. Several techniques resulted in significant improvements of different radiological parameters. Significantly, surgeries with smaller duration were associated with lesser blood loss. Bone graft use caused a significant raise in post-operative complications, namely donor site pain. So, this paper showed that significative improvements in radiological parameters do not associate with correspondent clinical benefits, and only instrumentation with level screw incorporation is associated with a clear benefit on pain. Moreover, the need for bone graft is questioned, since it leads to no clinic-radiological improvement with a raise of complications. However, a small number of controlled studies is available on this topic.Repositório ComumLinhares, DNeves, NRibeiro da Silva, MAlmeida Fonseca, J2017-01-12T22:34:34Z2016-052016-05-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/17484porActa Med Port. 2016 May;29(5):297-300.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-12-20T14:25:08ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073
Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Fixação com Parafusos Pediculares de Fraturas Traumáticas da Coluna Vertebral Torácica e Lombar. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.
title Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073
spellingShingle Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073
Linhares, D
Fixação de Fractura
Fracturas da Coluna Vertebral
Parafusos Ósseos
Revisão Sistemática
Vértebras Lombares/ lesões
Vértebras Torácicas/lesões
Bone Screws
Fracture Fixation
Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Spinal Fractures/ surgery
Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries
title_short Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073
title_full Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073
title_fullStr Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073
title_sort Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073
author Linhares, D
author_facet Linhares, D
Neves, N
Ribeiro da Silva, M
Almeida Fonseca, J
author_role author
author2 Neves, N
Ribeiro da Silva, M
Almeida Fonseca, J
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Comum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Linhares, D
Neves, N
Ribeiro da Silva, M
Almeida Fonseca, J
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fixação de Fractura
Fracturas da Coluna Vertebral
Parafusos Ósseos
Revisão Sistemática
Vértebras Lombares/ lesões
Vértebras Torácicas/lesões
Bone Screws
Fracture Fixation
Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Spinal Fractures/ surgery
Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries
topic Fixação de Fractura
Fracturas da Coluna Vertebral
Parafusos Ósseos
Revisão Sistemática
Vértebras Lombares/ lesões
Vértebras Torácicas/lesões
Bone Screws
Fracture Fixation
Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Spinal Fractures/ surgery
Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries
description Traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are common causes of spine surgery. Pedicle screw fixation is usually chosen, using monosegmentar, short or long segment instrumentations, with or without bone graft. This review aims to evaluate the effect of transpedicular fixation in traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A systematic search on controlled, randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing different methods of surgical treatment of this fractures was performed, followed by a process of article selection, data extraction and bias assessment by 3 independent authors. Eight articles were included in a total of 5 comparisons, between different transpedicular fixation techniques. No significant differences on function or quality of life, neurologic status or limitation of motion were found. Only instrumentation with fracture level screw incorporation showed significant decrease of pain when compared with instrumentation alone. Several techniques resulted in significant improvements of different radiological parameters. Significantly, surgeries with smaller duration were associated with lesser blood loss. Bone graft use caused a significant raise in post-operative complications, namely donor site pain. So, this paper showed that significative improvements in radiological parameters do not associate with correspondent clinical benefits, and only instrumentation with level screw incorporation is associated with a clear benefit on pain. Moreover, the need for bone graft is questioned, since it leads to no clinic-radiological improvement with a raise of complications. However, a small number of controlled studies is available on this topic.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05
2016-05-01T00:00:00Z
2017-01-12T22:34:34Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/17484
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/17484
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Med Port. 2016 May;29(5):297-300.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777301671993409536