The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: technological versus behavioural experiments

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, A. C.
Data de Publicação: 2006
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/509
Resumo: In the natural sciences there is a general consensus on the epistemic value conferred to by the participation of the ‘material world’ in the experimental process of Knowledge production. This is no different in experimental economics. However, an inquiry into the epistemic role of the ‘materials’ of economics is still incipient. The present paper is meant as a contribution to this inquiry. Two categories of experiments are identified according to the differentiated role of the ‘materials’ of economics. Technological experiments produce knowledge of how to design market institutions for specific purposes. The crucial ‘material’ of these experiments is the institution that organizes the interactions of the experimental participants. Behavioral experiments produce knowledge of individual behavior in varied decision contexts. The crucial ‘material’ of these experiments is the agency of the experimental participants. FCC spectrum auctions and ultimatum game experiments illustrate technological and behavioral experiments, respectively. General policy implications are also drawn for each kind of experiment.
id RCAP_b9aa56ff87465a54d0f1d4ccf604737d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/509
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: technological versus behavioural experimentsExperimental economicsIncentive compatible mechanismsInstitutionsAuction experimentsUltimatum game experimentsIn the natural sciences there is a general consensus on the epistemic value conferred to by the participation of the ‘material world’ in the experimental process of Knowledge production. This is no different in experimental economics. However, an inquiry into the epistemic role of the ‘materials’ of economics is still incipient. The present paper is meant as a contribution to this inquiry. Two categories of experiments are identified according to the differentiated role of the ‘materials’ of economics. Technological experiments produce knowledge of how to design market institutions for specific purposes. The crucial ‘material’ of these experiments is the institution that organizes the interactions of the experimental participants. Behavioral experiments produce knowledge of individual behavior in varied decision contexts. The crucial ‘material’ of these experiments is the agency of the experimental participants. FCC spectrum auctions and ultimatum game experiments illustrate technological and behavioral experiments, respectively. General policy implications are also drawn for each kind of experiment.Dinâmia2007-07-18T14:21:31Z2006-01-01T00:00:00Z2006info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/509engSantos, A. C.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-25T17:31:15ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: technological versus behavioural experiments
title The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: technological versus behavioural experiments
spellingShingle The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: technological versus behavioural experiments
Santos, A. C.
Experimental economics
Incentive compatible mechanisms
Institutions
Auction experiments
Ultimatum game experiments
title_short The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: technological versus behavioural experiments
title_full The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: technological versus behavioural experiments
title_fullStr The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: technological versus behavioural experiments
title_full_unstemmed The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: technological versus behavioural experiments
title_sort The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: technological versus behavioural experiments
author Santos, A. C.
author_facet Santos, A. C.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, A. C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Experimental economics
Incentive compatible mechanisms
Institutions
Auction experiments
Ultimatum game experiments
topic Experimental economics
Incentive compatible mechanisms
Institutions
Auction experiments
Ultimatum game experiments
description In the natural sciences there is a general consensus on the epistemic value conferred to by the participation of the ‘material world’ in the experimental process of Knowledge production. This is no different in experimental economics. However, an inquiry into the epistemic role of the ‘materials’ of economics is still incipient. The present paper is meant as a contribution to this inquiry. Two categories of experiments are identified according to the differentiated role of the ‘materials’ of economics. Technological experiments produce knowledge of how to design market institutions for specific purposes. The crucial ‘material’ of these experiments is the institution that organizes the interactions of the experimental participants. Behavioral experiments produce knowledge of individual behavior in varied decision contexts. The crucial ‘material’ of these experiments is the agency of the experimental participants. FCC spectrum auctions and ultimatum game experiments illustrate technological and behavioral experiments, respectively. General policy implications are also drawn for each kind of experiment.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-01-01T00:00:00Z
2006
2007-07-18T14:21:31Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/509
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/509
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dinâmia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dinâmia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777303974437715968