Fever from Primary Tooth Eruption – What is the evidence?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Matos, Sara
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Silva, Patrícia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v27.i4.14236
Resumo: Introduction: There is no consensus on the causal relationship between primary dental eruption and both systemic and local signs and symptoms. Fever, an important sign, is often reported. Such lack of evidence hampers clinical reasoning and may contribute to delayed diagnosis of important conditions. Objective: To review existing evidence underlying the association between primary tooth eruption and fever. Methods: A review of the evidence on English, Portuguese and Spanish scientific publications over the last ten years was performed in the main international databases using the query “tooth eruption” and “fever” [MeSH], and in the index of Portuguese medical journals using the query “erupção dentária” and “febre” [DeCS]. SORT system of the American Family Physician was used for rating the strength of evidence. Results: A total of 53 articles were retrieved, from which two meta-analyses and two original studies were selected, comprising a total of 5317 children. Massignan et al. (2016) meta-analysis and Memarpour et al. (2015) clinical trial found a slight temperature increase on the day of primary tooth eruption, but no fever. In Nemezio et al. (2017) meta-analysis, this association was observed in the subgroup that used the rectal method for temperature assessment. Un Lam et al. (2016) observational study reported a fever prevalence of 49.9%. Discussion and conclusions: The present analysis had several limitations, including a significant heterogeneity amongst studies in the definition of fever, interpersonal variability during fever measurements, different fever assessment methods or absence of that information, and no exclusion of confounding factors. Given available evidence, it is not possible to establish a clear association between primary dental eruption and the occurrence of fever. A higher number of robust studies is required to confirm this hypothesis (SORT B).
id RCAP_ba6c7982227d60518020d4649f0cc1ec
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/14236
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Fever from Primary Tooth Eruption – What is the evidence?Febre durante a erupção dentária primária − Há evidência?Review ArticlesIntroduction: There is no consensus on the causal relationship between primary dental eruption and both systemic and local signs and symptoms. Fever, an important sign, is often reported. Such lack of evidence hampers clinical reasoning and may contribute to delayed diagnosis of important conditions. Objective: To review existing evidence underlying the association between primary tooth eruption and fever. Methods: A review of the evidence on English, Portuguese and Spanish scientific publications over the last ten years was performed in the main international databases using the query “tooth eruption” and “fever” [MeSH], and in the index of Portuguese medical journals using the query “erupção dentária” and “febre” [DeCS]. SORT system of the American Family Physician was used for rating the strength of evidence. Results: A total of 53 articles were retrieved, from which two meta-analyses and two original studies were selected, comprising a total of 5317 children. Massignan et al. (2016) meta-analysis and Memarpour et al. (2015) clinical trial found a slight temperature increase on the day of primary tooth eruption, but no fever. In Nemezio et al. (2017) meta-analysis, this association was observed in the subgroup that used the rectal method for temperature assessment. Un Lam et al. (2016) observational study reported a fever prevalence of 49.9%. Discussion and conclusions: The present analysis had several limitations, including a significant heterogeneity amongst studies in the definition of fever, interpersonal variability during fever measurements, different fever assessment methods or absence of that information, and no exclusion of confounding factors. Given available evidence, it is not possible to establish a clear association between primary dental eruption and the occurrence of fever. A higher number of robust studies is required to confirm this hypothesis (SORT B).Introdução: Não existe consenso na literatura sobre a existência de uma relação causal entre erupção dentária primária e ocorrência de sinais e sintomas sistémicos e locais. A febre, um importante sinal clínico, é frequentemente reportada por pais e profissionais de saúde. A falta de evidência dificulta o raciocínio clínico, podendo contribuir para atrasos no diagnóstico de patologias importantes associadas a este sintoma. Objetivo: Rever a evidência disponível acerca de uma associação entre erupção dentária primária em lactentes e o aparecimento de febre. Métodos: Foi efetuada uma pesquisa de artigos científicos em Inglês, Português e Espanhol publicados nos últimos dez anos nas principais bases de dados médicas internacionais utilizando os termos MeSH “tooth eruption” e “fever”, e no índice de revistas médicas Portuguesas utilizando os termos DeCS “erupção dentária” e “febre”. Foi utilizada a escala SORT da American Family Physician para avaliar os níveis de evidência. Resultados: Foram identificadas 53 publicações, das quais foram selecionados duas meta-análises e dois artigos originais, abrangendo um total de 5317 crianças. Na meta-análise de Massignan et al. (2016) e no ensaio clínico de Memarpour et al. (2015), verificou-se um ligeiro aumento da temperatura no dia da erução dentária primária, mas não foi descrita a ocorrência de febre. Na meta-análise de Nemezio et al. (2017), essa associação foi encontrada no subgrupo que utilizou o método retal para medição da temperatura. O estudo observacional de Un Lam et al. (2016) encontrou uma prevalência de febre de 49,9%. Discussão e conclusões: A presente análise tem várias limitações: uma grande heterogeneidade entre estudos na definição de febre, variabilidade interpessoal na realização das respetivas medições, utilização de diferentes métodos de medição de febre ou ausência de referência ao mesmo, e ausência de exclusão de fatores de confundimento. Perante a evidência disponível, não é possível confirmar a existência de uma associação entre erupção dentária primária e febre, sendo necessários mais estudos robustos para avaliar esta hipótese (SORT B).Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto2018-12-28T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v27.i4.14236eng2183-9417Matos, SaraSilva, Patríciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-21T14:55:30Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/14236Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:56:26.703163Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fever from Primary Tooth Eruption – What is the evidence?
Febre durante a erupção dentária primária − Há evidência?
title Fever from Primary Tooth Eruption – What is the evidence?
spellingShingle Fever from Primary Tooth Eruption – What is the evidence?
Matos, Sara
Review Articles
title_short Fever from Primary Tooth Eruption – What is the evidence?
title_full Fever from Primary Tooth Eruption – What is the evidence?
title_fullStr Fever from Primary Tooth Eruption – What is the evidence?
title_full_unstemmed Fever from Primary Tooth Eruption – What is the evidence?
title_sort Fever from Primary Tooth Eruption – What is the evidence?
author Matos, Sara
author_facet Matos, Sara
Silva, Patrícia
author_role author
author2 Silva, Patrícia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Matos, Sara
Silva, Patrícia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Review Articles
topic Review Articles
description Introduction: There is no consensus on the causal relationship between primary dental eruption and both systemic and local signs and symptoms. Fever, an important sign, is often reported. Such lack of evidence hampers clinical reasoning and may contribute to delayed diagnosis of important conditions. Objective: To review existing evidence underlying the association between primary tooth eruption and fever. Methods: A review of the evidence on English, Portuguese and Spanish scientific publications over the last ten years was performed in the main international databases using the query “tooth eruption” and “fever” [MeSH], and in the index of Portuguese medical journals using the query “erupção dentária” and “febre” [DeCS]. SORT system of the American Family Physician was used for rating the strength of evidence. Results: A total of 53 articles were retrieved, from which two meta-analyses and two original studies were selected, comprising a total of 5317 children. Massignan et al. (2016) meta-analysis and Memarpour et al. (2015) clinical trial found a slight temperature increase on the day of primary tooth eruption, but no fever. In Nemezio et al. (2017) meta-analysis, this association was observed in the subgroup that used the rectal method for temperature assessment. Un Lam et al. (2016) observational study reported a fever prevalence of 49.9%. Discussion and conclusions: The present analysis had several limitations, including a significant heterogeneity amongst studies in the definition of fever, interpersonal variability during fever measurements, different fever assessment methods or absence of that information, and no exclusion of confounding factors. Given available evidence, it is not possible to establish a clear association between primary dental eruption and the occurrence of fever. A higher number of robust studies is required to confirm this hypothesis (SORT B).
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-28T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v27.i4.14236
url https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v27.i4.14236
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2183-9417
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130432633044992