Multimorbidity and consultation time: a systematic review

• Autor(a) principal: Tadeu, Ana Carolina Reis
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Outros Autores: e Silva Caetano, Inês Rosendo Carvalho, FIGUEIREDO, INÊS, Santiago, Luiz Miguel
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/36977; https://doi.org/Tadeu, A.C.R., e Silva Caetano, I.R.C., de Figueiredo, I.J. et al. Multimorbidity and consultation time: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2020:21(1);152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01219-5; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01219-5
• topic: Multimorbidity; Medical appointment; Quality of healthcare; Consultation length; Research Subject Categories::MEDICINE::Social medicine::Public health medicine research areas::Family medicine

Background Multimorbidity (MM) is one of the major challenges health systems currently face. Management of time length of a medical consultation with a patient with MM is a matter of concern for doctors. Methods A systematic review was performed to describe the impact of MM on the average time of a medical consultation considering the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The systematic online searches of the Embase and PubMed databases were undertaken, from January 2000 to August 2018. The studies were independently screened by two reviewers to decide which ones met the inclusion criteria. (Kappa = 0.84 and Kappa = 0.82). Differing opinions were solved by a third person. This systematic review included people with MM criteria as participants (two or more chronic conditions in the same individual). The type of outcome included was explicitly defined – the length of medical appointments with patients with MM. Any strategies aiming to analyse the impact of MM on the average consultation time were considered. The length of time of medical appointment for patients without MM was the comparator criteria. Experimental and observational studies were included. Results Of 85 articles identified, only 1 observational study was included, showing a clear trend for patients with MM to have longer consultations than patients without MM criteria (p < 0.001). Conclusions More studies are required to better assess allocation length-time for patients with MM and to measure other characteristics like doctors’ workload.